To be clear: I contacted DERMAM <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/DERMAM> but I am not expecting reply, account is inactive since 6 months. <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/DERMAM>
2015-03-03 16:09 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com>: > I would remove such objects where I am surveying. In that case I contacted > author of tag with information that amenity=toilets is defined as public > toilet. > > 2015-03-03 16:00 GMT+01:00 John F. Eldredge <j...@jfeldredge.com>: > >> However, since someone apparently HAS been mapping private toilets, we >> need to either decide to remove them, or decide how they should be tagged >> to distinguish them from toilets available to the general public. >> >> -- >> John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com >> "Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot >> drive out hate; only love can do that." Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. >> >> On March 3, 2015 12:34:22 AM Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> "Excluding private toilet seems a sane step for a general purpose map." >>> >>> Completely private toilets (especially home toilets) may not be mapped >>> with amenity=toilet, what solves rendering problems. >>> >>> Public toilets with restricted access should be mapped with appropriate >>> access tag. >>> >>> >>> 2015-03-03 2:58 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com>: >>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:44 PM, John Willis <jo...@mac.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> > On Mar 3, 2015, at 7:45 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > 2) new key ... private=* ? >>>>> +1 >>>>> If OSM wants to be used in emergency uses or be flexible for odd data >>>>> sets, mapping private toilets (or propane ovens, house-top solar panels, >>>>> or >>>>> places where x is useful >>>>> >>>> >>>> 1) Tagging your neighbor's toilet/oven/Ferrari could easily be seen as >>>> coveting those items. I don't recommend it. YMMV. >>>> >>>> 2) A "private=" tag only works for certain tag types. >>>> However a namespace could work. "disused:" is one such namespace. For >>>> reference a sample use of "disused:" is: >>>> "disused:amenty=toilet , disused:note=Burned down 2014, scheduled for >>>> a rebuild August 2015". >>>> So you could entertain "private:amenity=toilet". >>>> >>>> 3) We already have "access=private", a well established tag. The >>>> question is which private things should be excluded from >>>> rendered maps (e.g. toilets), and which ones should show (e.g. >>>> buildings). >>>> Excluding private toilet seems a sane step for a general purpose map. >>>> Else you get this: >>>> >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3066715547#map=18/-16.03918/34.72667 >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Tagging mailing list >>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
