"Excluding private toilet seems a sane step for a general purpose map."
Completely private toilets (especially home toilets) may not be mapped with amenity=toilet, what solves rendering problems. Public toilets with restricted access should be mapped with appropriate access tag. 2015-03-03 2:58 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com>: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:44 PM, John Willis <jo...@mac.com> wrote: > >> > On Mar 3, 2015, at 7:45 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > 2) new key ... private=* ? >> +1 >> If OSM wants to be used in emergency uses or be flexible for odd data >> sets, mapping private toilets (or propane ovens, house-top solar panels, or >> places where x is useful >> > > 1) Tagging your neighbor's toilet/oven/Ferrari could easily be seen as > coveting those items. I don't recommend it. YMMV. > > 2) A "private=" tag only works for certain tag types. > However a namespace could work. "disused:" is one such namespace. For > reference a sample use of "disused:" is: > "disused:amenty=toilet , disused:note=Burned down 2014, scheduled for a > rebuild August 2015". > So you could entertain "private:amenity=toilet". > > 3) We already have "access=private", a well established tag. The > question is which private things should be excluded from > rendered maps (e.g. toilets), and which ones should show (e.g. buildings). > Excluding private toilet seems a sane step for a general purpose map. > Else you get this: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3066715547#map=18/-16.03918/34.72667 > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
