There are two issues here: * Use of OSM to store demographic surveys, particularly using tags that imply the feature is public.
* The wider issue of mapping within a restricted place. Similar issues occur for amenities inside places (ATM's, AED's, Bike tool stations, toilets, drinking water). For example a mall toilet is public in a sense, but time restricted. Here access=destination (access restrictions are the same as some larger place). Basically my view is that the scope of the map should primarily focus on things the public can access, with smatterings of significant things the public can see or have heard about. Private toilets have no role here, and are just one step up from mapping private carpets, house pets and dust motes :-). The question is what action, if any, should be taken?
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
