I agree and disagree :) How many times have you heard this:
"I don't understand, I have antivirus software." "When was the last time you updated it?" "Update?" :-) I know tons of people with broadband connections that might be on only a few times a week. Some don't even notice their cpu is slower. I also know some pretty intelligent people that despite what they try, still end up with trojans and viruses from their kid's downloads. I say that your average middle class family will just never fully understand how to handle a computer on the net. They are busy scratching out a living. It needs to be made safer by the people who understand it. I can only effect my immediate family/friends. And despite my best efforts, they still get whacked now and then. Airbags make me safer. But there wasn't anyway in hell I was going to install them myself :) --Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Dowell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 11:43 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] [OT] - The current state spam. > > > I made this point on a mimedefang list. Some people didn't > really like it. > > Computers are too complicated for people to be responsible some said. > > So I tried equating it to maintaining your car in that, if > your car smokes > and causes pollution - it is NOT the manufacturers > responsibility to come > fix your car. It's your responsibility to take it to the > nearest mechanic. > If it smokes too much the police might just have to remove > you from the road > for other peoples safety. > > What I got in return to that was - Yeah sure, but doesn't relate. Auto > manufacturers don't put out buggy cars like microsoft puts out buggy > software. > > Hmm... good point - but doesn't microsoft put out these things called > patches? Is it not the users responsibility to maintain their software > (vehicle) but obtaining these patches (tune up). > > I don't see how this doesn't equate. It's the same friggin > thing. If you are > going to put yourself on the internet then you should be held > accountable > for what happens to your computer. It isn't microsoft/linux 's > responsibility to educate users. It's their own > responsibility to educate > themselves or suffer the consequences. You have to think of > this in terms of > the dsl/cable connections. Everyone is now "always on" which > in essence > makes them like a little open node on the internet. The > government is NOT > responsible, NOR the ISP, NOR the software manufacturer for > maintaining > safety of these little nodes. I'm sorry, but I will not see > this any other > way. The government doesn't know their head from their ass as > far as the > internet, the ISP should only be responsible for shutting the > nodes down > originating from their own network, and the software > manufacturers should > make patches available when they fix bugs. The USER is/SHOULD BE held > responsible to secure, maintain, upgrade, etc etc their > little node. Too > complicated? Then they don't need to be on the net all the > time (or period > for that matter as far as I'm concerned). Or they need to > hire a mechanic > "PC-TECH". > > All this really becomes is a whole debate of how responsible > should a user > be? > > I agree - the user should have responsibility. No one is/can > or should be > responsible to go out and hold every little users hand, and > assist them with > every little nuance of owning a computer. Maybe that sounds a > bit harsh, but > I still say it's like maintaining your car. All of this > knowledge and info > is freely available (some even in little paper books or cd's called > manuals). > > If you're stupid and don't read the "owners manual" for your > car, never > change the oil, wear your tires bald, never change the > windshield wipers, > and people force you to quit driving the vehicle, it's your OWN fault. > > If you don't RTFM, do a little research, (my god - it is NOT > THAT FRIGGIN > HARD) get the basics of owning a computer, and get your > little node shut > down because your a friggin idiot spewing crap out on the > net, because your > computers infected, because it got hacked, because you had no > protection, > etc etc, yadda, yadda - then it's your OWN fault. > > Think logically here folks. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pedro Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 11:44 PM > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] [OT] - The current state spam. > > > > I take an opposite view point. ISP's should disable a > user's account, if > that > > account is found to be launching any malicious attacks, > regardless of > whether > > that account was intentionally malicious or was simply hacked. > > > > It's time people own up to the responsibility of a presence on the > internet. > > > > -- > > In those days he was wiser than he is now -- he used to > frequently take > > my advice. > > -- Winston Churchill > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > > _______________________________________________ > > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk