> Personaly, based on their policies, I'm bewildered why anyone
> would ever use DCC in the first place on a "general purpose" type mail
> account. I could see it being pretty useful on an account that
subscribes to no
> mailing lists (commercial or conversational). That said, I'm
> certainly not polluting it, but I do feel that anyone using DCC is
just
> getting what they asked for if it starts tagging this list.
You could say the same about SpamAssassin itself. Without a
whitelist, it could catch messages based on its rules just as easily as
someone maliciously checksumming every message in the list for DCC.
Based on my experience, DCC is a reliable and good solution for
"general purpose" mailboxes as long as you keep in mind that you may
need to whitelist stuff you really want.
Chris
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
