I think you're missing my point. I never said DCC wasn't about bulk mail.
However I question your premise that anyone would *knowingly* submit a mailing list that they *deliberately* subscribed to, to a bulk detector like DCC. If they did, they're just being plain stupid, policies of DCC about accepting such submissions notwithstanding.
I'd say it's not necessarily stupid. A sufficiently clever person who opposes DCC would do such a thing to tarnish it's reputation and get people to stop using it.
Personaly, based on their policies, I'm bewildered why anyone would ever use DCC in the first place on a "general purpose" type mail account. I could see it being pretty useful on an account that subscribes to no mailing lists (commercial or conversational). That said, I'm certainly not polluting it, but I do feel that anyone using DCC is just getting what they asked for if it starts tagging this list.
Stupid or malicious, it is completely within the design of DCC to have this list in their database, so I do agree with Bob to the extent that it's not a "problem with DCC" but rather a "odd policy of DCC's you should be aware of before you use it"
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
