On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:58:31PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:36:33PM -0400, Elie Rosenblum wrote:
> > Shouldn't this be :0fbw? Otherwise it doesn't filter the body,
> > just the header.
> > 
> > (I generally specify :0fhbw, just so it's clear what I intend)
> 
> procmail defaults to hb.  :0fW is all you need. (w or W actually,
> depending on what you want to do with error messages...)
> 
> If, however, you want to have procmail try to match messages based on
> both the head and body, you need HB (H only by default...)

You're right, sorry. My bad, I was thinking about the second case.

> For this problem, define "not working"...  Do incoming mails have the
> X-Spam-Status header included?  Is the # of hits set to 0.0?
> 
> If the header is there, I would look at permission issues with spamd.
> 
> If the header isn't there, I would assume a problem with spamc.  In your
> example, you have "spamc" and "/usr/bin/spamassassin".  Is /usr/bin
> perhaps not in your path.  Try specifying the full "/usr/bin/spamc".
> 
> 
> (since running "spamassassin -P" works, I'm assuming the problem isn't
> procmail.)

Also, try running spamc from the command line - pipe it the sample
messages that come with spamassassin.

-- 
Elie Rosenblum                 That is not dead which can eternal lie,
http://www.cosanostra.net   And with strange aeons even death may die.
Admin / Mercenary / System Programmer             - _The Necronomicon_

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to