For some odd reason I had spamc not working and I finally track it down to
the spamd start up script for RH7.2 I used the line:

    daemon spamd -d -F0

in the start) switch statement it seems to fix my problems, which is rather
odd because the school's server has the same configuration and OS, and that
script works fine. I don't know if there is something screwy going on in the
server itself, maybe its time for a rebuild but that line works fine as
opposed to :

        daemon spamd -d -c -a -s -F0


    Cheers,

        Aly.


----- Original Message -----
From: "dman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamc not working?


> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:16:13PM -0700, Chuck Wolber wrote:
>
> | > You can also verify that spamc works from the command line.
> |
> | I also tried that too. I was able to connect, which seemed to be ok. I
> | also replaced spamc with a cheesy shell script that would output a line
> | into a file everytime it was called. It dutifully added a line to that
> | file everytime an e-mail came in. By that, I am sure procmail is doing
> | it's job and passing control to spamc.
>
> Pipe a message to spamc.  Eg :
>
>     cat message.rfc822 | spamc
>
> Verify that you get the message back.  The easiest way to see if the
> message was tagged as spam or not is
>
>     cat message.rfc822 | spamc | grep -i spam
>
> -D
>
> --
>
> Even youths grow tired and weary,
>     and young men stumble and fall;
> but those who hope in the Lord
>     will renew their strength.
> They will soar on wings like eagles;
>     they will run and not grow weary,
>     they will walk and not be faint.
>
>         Isaiah 40:31
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>


_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to