Arpi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 27 February 2002, Craig R Hughes said:
> > > 181 98 83 RATWARE
> >
> > That's interesting. I wonder if the RATWARE regex is too broad --
> > perhaps if it were toned down a bit, it would be better focussed on
> > spam. This ought to be a well-focused rule; how many people use
> > spamware to send out regular email?
>
> I doubt the non-spam folder is 100% spam-free.
I suppose that's possible, but I imagine that Craig was pretty careful
about weeding the corpus before he started basing the GA on it.
I have a handful of false-positive hits on that rule in SA2.01; all
involving a guy who uses CrescentNetworks.com (capitalized like that)
as a domain name. I'd imagine that many of the false positives are
just normal occurrences of "Avalanche", "Calypso", or "Crescent" in
the header.
--
Stephen L. Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP fingerprint: A1BF 5A81 03E7 47CE 71E0 3BD4 8DA6 9268 5BB6 4BBE
"Poodle: The other white meat." -- Sherman, Sherman's Lagoon
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
