I think the piece of the RATWARE test which is falling down is the YMR part. Three letters in a row have a pretty good probability of cropping up randomly in things like base64 coded docs. I bet if we take that one out the nonspam rate for RATWARE will plummet.
C Greg Ward wrote: > Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 21:13:04 -0500 > From: Greg Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Spamassassin-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: GA coming up with wacky scores? was Re: [SAtalk] Announcing > 2.1 release > > On 27 February 2002, Craig R Hughes said: > > 181 98 83 RATWARE > > That's interesting. I wonder if the RATWARE regex is too broad -- > perhaps if it were toned down a bit, it would be better focussed on > spam. This ought to be a well-focused rule; how many people use > spamware to send out regular email? > > Greg > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
