On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Greg Ward wrote:
> On 27 February 2002, Craig R Hughes said:
>> 181 98 83 RATWARE
>
> That's interesting. I wonder if the RATWARE regex is too broad --
> perhaps if it were toned down a bit, it would be better focussed on
> spam. This ought to be a well-focused rule; how many people use
> spamware to send out regular email?
In my corpus of ~180K non-spam mail, there are three lists on which
normal users have hits on the ratware test because of the mailer they
use.
Daniel
--
The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.
-- L P Hartley, _The Go-Between_
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
