Yeah, I think it probably might be better that way. I have to admit that I haven't actually been monitoring sa-sightings at all. I've more or less been relying on other people to notice anything particularly interesting there and bring it to the attention of people on this list. Most of the reason for that is that I don't really have the time to manually process all the mails depending on whether they've been bounced, forwarded, attached as ms-tnef docs, or whatnot. I'm not really sure if sa-sightings is the right way to go even -- what are other peoples thoughts on this?
C Sidney Markowitz wrote: > Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 23:23:11 -0800 > From: Sidney Markowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Question about sightings list > > Craig - > > I've been holding off sending email to spamassassin-sightings list > because I'm not comfortable with any of the options I have to forward > mail there. The mailers I use to read my mail don't have a bounce or > resend option, but even if they did that would change some of the > headers that might be part of the spam indicators. > > Wouldn't it be better to have people forward the mail as attachments, > then you have a script on the receiving end that strips out the > attachments and saves the pristine original message to your archive? > > -- sidney > > > > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
