I might be wrong, but I think there's something seriously amiss with the new GA-evolved scores - they don't seem to have an upper boundary (many are 9-10 or so) or a lower (some are negative). Some examples that can't be right:
score 25FREEMEGS_URL -4.606 score BE_AMAZED -4.581 score CASHCASHCASH -3.700 score CYBER_FIRE_POWER -4.020 score DEAR_SOMEBODY -4.412 score EXCUSE_5 13.447 score FREE_CONSULTATION 15.263 score GAPPY_TEXT -3.667 score IN_REP_TO -13.472 score MONSTERHUT -8.280 score ONCE_IN_LIFETIME -4.604 score PORN_8 -5.452 score TRACKER_ID -4.899 Aside from the boundary issue, is there perhaps something odd about the corpus? It doesn't include messages from this list, does it? I would think there would be no trouble calculating a positive score for something like "Monsterhut"... -- michael moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/ "I don't care what is written about me so long as it isn't true." -- Dorothy Parker _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
