Hi, > On 27 February 2002, Craig R Hughes said: > > 181 98 83 RATWARE > > That's interesting. I wonder if the RATWARE regex is too broad -- > perhaps if it were toned down a bit, it would be better focussed on > spam. This ought to be a well-focused rule; how many people use > spamware to send out regular email?
I doubt the non-spam folder is 100% spam-free. There are few (<100) hits of few rule which shouldn't be hit by non-spam at all. Maybe these mails should be manually verified... I had a ~68000 mails non-spam folder, and by experiencing with these tests i've found about 100 spam mails in it. And I think there are still a few spam mails hidden in it, so unless reading each mail by hand i won't be sure it's clean... By using only the very unique and accurate tests we could make an 1% sized folder and then check then one-by-one to be sure... A'rpi / Astral & ESP-team -- Developer of MPlayer, the Movie Player for Linux - http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
