+1 Upayavira and Bruno. Well said!
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak) <
sten...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>
> > Creating new mailing lists divides communities and should therefore be
> > done with caution.
> >
> > This commun
Yes, it was great to see there a so many passionated people on Wave.
Last month I really thought Wave would move to attic. But with the
things happening the past two weeks I thinkg there is a chance.
Please keep on working like that. Buzz of that kind will finally
attract developers too.
Cheers
Ch
one thing that would be pretty sweet would be if you could subscribe to
mailing lists but from your wave server, extra points if the way you do it
is federating to the wiab.net server and subscribing to its email wave :)
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Pratik Paranjape
wrote:
> +1 Upayavira and
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 08:52 AM, Fleeky Flanco wrote:
> one thing that would be pretty sweet would be if you could subscribe to
> mailing lists but from your wave server, extra points if the way you do
> it
> is federating to the wiab.net server and subscribing to its email wave :)
Get coding!
I agree!
Cheers,
PP
On Jun 5, 2013, at 7:41 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> Following on from the talk, if we intend to develop Apache Wave as an
> end-product focused project, we should probably migrate talks of
> 'visions' and 'community' to a separate mailing list from to allow
> wave-dev to be kept a
I do this on my *nix machine before posting.
I strongly encourage others to also try running it...
Ali
On 6 Jun 2013 02:57, "Michael MacFadden"
wrote:
> As a sanity check has any one grabbed the release and tried to run the
> server? I can give it a try on OSX?
>
> On 6/5/13 6:14 PM, "Joseph G
Furthermore, when the time comes Apache foundation can provide us with a
server to run this email-wave bridge. But to run a bridge, the bridge needs
to exist first :-)
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 08:52 AM, Fleeky Flanco wrote:
> > one thing th
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11669/
---
Review request for wave.
Description
---
Adds a new ant target, that gener
I have cleaned up the wiki a bit, converted old wiki tags to the new wiki
format, etc.
Also, I've implemented a new ant target that automatically generates the
Prosody configuration file necessary for federation. This is my first time
using Review Board, so please guide me if I did anything incorr
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11669/#review21512
---
Thanks for this.
Can I request that we do include s2s_ports, and co
I have a problem with the SHA1 files, not sure if it is my fault.
$ openssl sha1 /release-checking/apache-wave-bin-0.4-incubating.zip
SHA1(/Users/cy/Documents/release-checking/apache-wave-bin-0.4-incubating.zip)=
dc3970d589b4db222b2672bae6a3bff4830b07e3
$ cat /release-checking/apache-wave-bin-0.4
That would be because it is a SHA512 as was recommended for newer
releases in one of the many documents.
This would be noted on the download page where links to signatures are
made, so shouldn't be a problem.
Ali
On 6 June 2013 11:02, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> I have a problem with the SHA1
The exact command was: 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha'
On 6 June 2013 11:05, Ali Lown wrote:
> That would be because it is a SHA512 as was recommended for newer
> releases in one of the many documents.
>
> This would be noted on the download page where links to signatures are
> made, so shoul
> On June 6, 2013, 9:58 a.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > Thanks for this.
> >
> > Can I request that we do include s2s_ports, and component_ports in the
> > generated configuration set to their default values.
> > This is to make it explicit the relation between this, the component port
> > setting i
> On June 6, 2013, 9:58 a.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > Thanks for this.
> >
> > Can I request that we do include s2s_ports, and component_ports in the
> > generated configuration set to their default values.
> > This is to make it explicit the relation between this, the component port
> > setting i
Great, thanks for your help. All is well now.
For all others who want to quickly check signatures and sha, here is a
little script. I included MD5 checking as well, maybe its of use later
(md5 is pretty common at the asf too). Please note, KEYS must be
imported to succeed this. Also download locati
+1 (IPMC)
I didn't find anything else so far which is problematic. My guess is,
other IPMC members will find something (first releases are worst)
I checked on licenses, signatures, sha and looked around. I didn't do
technical checks, like running the server or so. My take on pre 1.0
version is, t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11669/
---
(Updated June 6, 2013, 10:46 a.m.)
Review request for wave.
Changes
---
Good points all. I am content to continue the Wave:Forward level of
discussion in this venue, as long as we're focusing on the re-architecture
of the Wave platform it's very much a development focus. Perhaps another
list will make sense when there's more of a product management focus for
Wave - but
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11675/
---
Review request for wave.
Description
---
Fix the check-certificates.sh scr
Please, separate things! Political & management stuff one way, development/user
support another.
It's really painful to get dozens of e-mails just because of logo stuff and
such, no matter how important the subject is. And yes, I can use filters, but
still they're not perfect and are PITA to mai
Paulo,
I'm not saying we won't separate, I'm just saying I want us to wait a
bit. I'm asking you to sit with the pain for a bit longer, so we can
allow what the other, non-coding discussions are really about to emerge,
and for others to show up and start engaging with the coding part of
this proje
Hi all,
I see that there's bits of documentation here and there, sometimes it's
duplicated in several places:
- Source code (README file, server-config.xml description tags, comments
inside sh scripts...)
- Confluence wiki at apache
- WaveProtocol.org site
(not sure if I missed any place else?)
Bruno,
Sorting out the documentation is a great way you can help.
Angus has been helping migrate + update the information from the
waveprotocol site over the last few months.
We have been putting all new documentation in the wiki here, since it
is the easiest place for it to all be found and edit
Upayavira, Thanks, those are my thoughts exactly. I will not inundate this
community unnecessarily with communications, but I agree that focusing on
having a community that's vibrant and engaged is a key function of this
list. If we get more developers excited and engaged then that's a good
thing -
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> Angus has been helping migrate + update the information from the
> waveprotocol site over the last few months.
>
Is the plan to migrate everything from waveprotocol site to the apache
wiki, or will some docs remain there?
We have been putting a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11676/
---
Review request for wave.
Description
---
The configuration file has an emp
also as much as i really really want to do most of this communication on
someone (anyone's) wave server has anyone thought of having an official
wave irc channel on freenode or something ?
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:53 AM, John Blossom wrote:
> Upayavira, Thanks, those are my thoughts exactly. I
Some of us are at #wiab@freenode while we test federation, since it's
faster to debug stuff over IM than over emails.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Fleeky Flanco wrote:
> also as much as i really really want to do most of this communication on
> someone (anyone's) wave server has anyone thoug
Folks please don't forget one thing: if it doesn't happen on list, it
didn't happen.
Votes, decision makings in general etc belong to the mailing list. It
needs to be documented, there need to be a chance for non-IRCers to
intervene.
Also it might make sense to discuss debugging things on ml - othe
There seems to exist a changeset that enables rendering of avatars in the
wave panel (top-right side), instead of the current text-only list of
participants.
Ali mentioned gravatar used to be enabled for participant list, but at some
point it got disabled.
Since the code is easy to integrate back
Upon inspection of the codebase history, I wonder if I am now
imagining the avatars being disabled, as I don't see a commit which
would have done so...
Ali
On 6 June 2013 20:00, Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak) wrote:
> There seems to exist a changeset that enables rendering of avatars in the
> wave
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11669/#review21536
---
Ship it!
LGTM.
- Ali Lown
On June 6, 2013, 10:46 a.m., Bruno Gon
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11676/#review21537
---
Ship it!
LGTM.
- Ali Lown
On June 6, 2013, 4:26 p.m., Bruno Gonz
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11675/#review21538
---
This looks fine.
It is probably worth adding a warning/note that th
So I'm starting to write a basic agent bot in order to see what's possible
and what not.
I'm able to receive WaveletSelfAdded and DocumentChanged events. I can also
append text to the end of a bliip, and create child blips. So the basics
seem to be working correctly.
However, I'm having trouble w
Interestingly, this exception is identical to one of the ones
federation was having problems with.
There it occurs when the in-memory structures for the client simply
don't appear to get loaded, despite it having had the required
waveletUpdate events that should have handled it.
It looks like you
Shall it be committed to trunk then?
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> Upon inspection of the codebase history, I wonder if I am now
> imagining the avatars being disabled, as I don't see a commit which
> would have done so...
>
> Ali
>
> On 6 June 2013 20:00, Bruno Gonzalez (ak
Have you looked through past mailing list discussions to see if the change
was previously rejected? I feel like I remember something about Gravatar
being discussed in the past.
—Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro
On Jun 6, 2013 6:28 PM, "Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak)"
wrote:
> Shall it be committed to trun
I see no reason not to, but give it more time for others to actually comment.
(Looks like we could be making a 0.5 release sooner than expected. ;) )
On 6 June 2013 23:27, Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak) wrote:
> Shall it be committed to trunk then?
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Ali Lown w
For the record, I've tried changing the delta persistence from "file" to
"memory" to see if anything changes. My tests consist on adding the bot to
a wave, editing a blip, adding same-level and nested blips, removing blips,
adding and removing a third participant. These are the callbacks I get in
b
41 matches
Mail list logo
