+1 (IPMC) I didn't find anything else so far which is problematic. My guess is, other IPMC members will find something (first releases are worst)
I checked on licenses, signatures, sha and looked around. I didn't do technical checks, like running the server or so. My take on pre 1.0 version is, they are unstable. So I would not block a release when something crashes or so. Cheers Christian On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Ali Lown <a...@apache.org> wrote: > Lets try again with this then... > > Wave 0.4 RC3 is available for review here: > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc3/ > > This is a build from the subversion tag wave-0.4-rc3 at: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/tags/ > > A summary can be found in the RELEASE-NOTES at: > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc3/RELEASE-NOTES > and included in the tarballs. > > Votes, please. This vote will close at 2000 GMT 8-June 2013. > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > Thanks. > Ali > > --------------------------- > The 'minor note' again for those still confused: Only votes from > the members of the PMC are binding, however votes from other > committers, users, and contributors are welcomed. If your vote is > negative, please leave a comment explaining clearly why. Refer to > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html for more information on > this process. -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de