+1 (IPMC)

I didn't find anything else so far which is problematic. My guess is,
other IPMC members will find something (first releases are worst)

I checked on licenses, signatures, sha and looked around. I didn't do
technical checks, like running the server or so. My take on pre 1.0
version is, they are unstable. So I would not block a release when
something crashes or so.

Cheers
Christian

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Ali Lown <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> Lets try again with this then...
>
> Wave 0.4 RC3 is available for review here:
> https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc3/
>
> This is a build from the subversion tag wave-0.4-rc3 at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/tags/
>
> A summary can be found in the RELEASE-NOTES at:
> https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc3/RELEASE-NOTES
> and included in the tarballs.
>
> Votes, please. This vote will close at 2000 GMT 8-June 2013.
>
> [  ] +1   Release these artifacts
> [  ] +0   OK, but...
> [  ] -0    OK, but really should fix...
> [  ] -1    I oppose this release because...
>
> Thanks.
> Ali
>
> ---------------------------
> The 'minor note' again for those still confused: Only votes from
> the members of the PMC are binding, however votes from other
> committers, users, and contributors are welcomed. If your vote is
> negative, please leave a comment explaining clearly why. Refer to
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html for more information on
> this process.



-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de

Reply via email to