Paulo, I'm not saying we won't separate, I'm just saying I want us to wait a bit. I'm asking you to sit with the pain for a bit longer, so we can allow what the other, non-coding discussions are really about to emerge, and for others to show up and start engaging with the coding part of this project - that's the most important thing in the end. Talk is easy, actually doing takes more effort.
Upayavira On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 02:51 PM, Paulo Pires wrote: > Please, separate things! Political & management stuff one way, > development/user support another. > It's really painful to get dozens of e-mails just because of logo stuff > and such, no matter how important the subject is. And yes, I can use > filters, but still they're not perfect and are PITA to maintain. > > PP > > On Jun 6, 2013, at 1:58 PM, "John Blossom - Shore Communications Inc." > <jblos...@shore.com> wrote: > > > Good points all. I am content to continue the Wave:Forward level of > > discussion in this venue, as long as we're focusing on the re-architecture > > of the Wave platform it's very much a development focus. Perhaps another > > list will make sense when there's more of a product management focus for > > Wave - but first we need a more marketable platform. So I will continue to > > feed ideas on market requirements and product specifications here for now, > > unless something else evolves. And yes, it will be nice to "eat our own dog > > food" and use Wave itself as the communications platform. > > > > John >
