Some of us are at #wiab@freenode while we test federation, since it's faster to debug stuff over IM than over emails.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Fleeky Flanco <fle...@gmail.com> wrote: > also as much as i really really want to do most of this communication on > someone (anyone's) wave server has anyone thought of having an official > wave irc channel on freenode or something ? > > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:53 AM, John Blossom <jblos...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Upayavira, Thanks, those are my thoughts exactly. I will not inundate > this > > community unnecessarily with communications, but I agree that focusing on > > having a community that's vibrant and engaged is a key function of this > > list. If we get more developers excited and engaged then that's a good > > thing - and that's what we need to focus on. Once there's more consensus > on > > development direction, then we can think about a platform-product channel > > as necessary. Perhaps in the meantime we can agree to some subject line > > protocol that will make it easier for people to filter messages, such as > a > > hashtag (#waveforward). > > > > Best, > > John > > > > email: jblos...@gmail.com > > phone: 203.293.8511 > > google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > Paulo, > > > > > > I'm not saying we won't separate, I'm just saying I want us to wait a > > > bit. I'm asking you to sit with the pain for a bit longer, so we can > > > allow what the other, non-coding discussions are really about to > emerge, > > > and for others to show up and start engaging with the coding part of > > > this project - that's the most important thing in the end. Talk is > easy, > > > actually doing takes more effort. > > > > > > Upayavira > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 02:51 PM, Paulo Pires wrote: > > > > Please, separate things! Political & management stuff one way, > > > > development/user support another. > > > > It's really painful to get dozens of e-mails just because of logo > stuff > > > > and such, no matter how important the subject is. And yes, I can use > > > > filters, but still they're not perfect and are PITA to maintain. > > > > > > > > PP > > > > > > > > On Jun 6, 2013, at 1:58 PM, "John Blossom - Shore Communications > Inc." > > > > <jblos...@shore.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Good points all. I am content to continue the Wave:Forward level of > > > > > discussion in this venue, as long as we're focusing on the > > > re-architecture > > > > > of the Wave platform it's very much a development focus. Perhaps > > > another > > > > > list will make sense when there's more of a product management > focus > > > for > > > > > Wave - but first we need a more marketable platform. So I will > > > continue to > > > > > feed ideas on market requirements and product specifications here > for > > > now, > > > > > unless something else evolves. And yes, it will be nice to "eat our > > > own dog > > > > > food" and use Wave itself as the communications platform. > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > -- Saludos, Bruno González _______________________________________________ Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com http://www.stenyak.com
