The exact command was: 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha'
On 6 June 2013 11:05, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > That would be because it is a SHA512 as was recommended for newer > releases in one of the many documents. > > This would be noted on the download page where links to signatures are > made, so shouldn't be a problem. > > Ali > > On 6 June 2013 11:02, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I have a problem with the SHA1 files, not sure if it is my fault. >> >> $ openssl sha1 /release-checking/apache-wave-bin-0.4-incubating.zip >> SHA1(/Users/cy/Documents/release-checking/apache-wave-bin-0.4-incubating.zip)= >> dc3970d589b4db222b2672bae6a3bff4830b07e3 >> >> $ cat /release-checking/apache-wave-bin-0.4-incubating.zip.sha >> apache-wave-bin-0.4-incubating.zip: 788E8758 3257C62F B845615F 7F018567 >> 0D6CC1DB >> 3824C549 E281BC2F B14EF768 FB40F127 >> D4CE227E >> 0489A6C8 7071CC0F 5B19D0DE D5E2B6DD >> A9EA17DD >> A841548E >> >> If it would be just the formatting, i would be not so concerned so >> much, but the number is simply not identical. >> Any ideas? >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Ali Lown <a...@apache.org> wrote: >>> Lets try again with this then... >>> >>> Wave 0.4 RC3 is available for review here: >>> https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc3/ >>> >>> This is a build from the subversion tag wave-0.4-rc3 at: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/tags/ >>> >>> A summary can be found in the RELEASE-NOTES at: >>> https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc3/RELEASE-NOTES >>> and included in the tarballs. >>> >>> Votes, please. This vote will close at 2000 GMT 8-June 2013. >>> >>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts >>> [ ] +0 OK, but... >>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... >>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... >>> >>> Thanks. >>> Ali >>> >>> --------------------------- >>> The 'minor note' again for those still confused: Only votes from >>> the members of the PMC are binding, however votes from other >>> committers, users, and contributors are welcomed. If your vote is >>> negative, please leave a comment explaining clearly why. Refer to >>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html for more information on >>> this process. >> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> https://www.timeandbill.de
