good news
On 4 January 2016 at 23:33, Yuri Z wrote:
> Ok, we have Ians vote!
>
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 1:17 PM Yuri Z wrote:
>
> > I think Ian already figured out his issues. The first one - he had to use
> > jdk1.7 - the second one - you had first to compile with ant before
> > importing the
Ok, we have Ians vote!
On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 1:17 PM Yuri Z wrote:
> I think Ian already figured out his issues. The first one - he had to use
> jdk1.7 - the second one - you had first to compile with ant before
> importing the project into Eclipse. Anyway, we have new build system in
> place.
I think Ian already figured out his issues. The first one - he had to use
jdk1.7 - the second one - you had first to compile with ant before
importing the project into Eclipse. Anyway, we have new build system in
place.
On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 4:12 AM Andreas Kotes
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 04:49:30PM +, Upayavira wrote:
> Someone needs to just agitate on general@incubator to find a volunteer
> or two to review our release.
>
> Once it has received three +1 votes from Incubator PMC members, it will
> be an official incubator release and we are done with th
@Ali @Upayavira can you please forward this mail thread (from general@apache)
So i can reply with same subject?
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 3:21 PM Upayavira wrote:
> Not quite the same. The project has put the release to the Incubator
> PMC. If they do not respond, it isn't the Wave community's fau
Andreas,
Currently, regarding this release, we are not aware of any legal issues
with the release candidate. Because it is our first, it needs to be
vetted by the Incubator PMC (project management committee). The
Incubator PMC is a large and diverse group, and it can sometimes be hard
to get peopl
Someone needs to just agitate on general@incubator to find a volunteer
or two to review our release.
Once it has received three +1 votes from Incubator PMC members, it will
be an official incubator release and we are done with that task.
Upayavira
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015, at 02:23 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 03:25:26PM +0100, Andreas Kotes wrote:
> what about the due reports?
oh. those were filed. my bad.
count
--
Andreas 'count' Kotes
Taming computers for humans since 1990.
"Don't ask what the world needs. Ask what makes you come alive, and go do it.
Because what th
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 02:23:21PM +, Yuri Z wrote:
> @Ali @Upayavira
> Is the release still stuck?
> Are there any issues can be addressed to finalize the release?
is there any way to help out?
what about the due reports?
count
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:01 PM Michael MacFadden <
@Ali @Upayavira
Is the release still stuck?
Are there any issues can be addressed to finalize the release?
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:01 PM Michael MacFadden <
michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok,
>
> I am revising the legal perspective today.
>
>
>
>
> On 10/20/15, 6:40 PM, "Upayavira" wrot
Not quite the same. The project has put the release to the Incubator
PMC. If they do not respond, it isn't the Wave community's fault. So, in
the board report, you can state that you are waiting on the Incubator
PMC to complete your I first release vote.
Upayavira
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015, at 10:15 A
Im assuming since we havnt heard anything the situation is still the same?
On 17 November 2015 at 03:33, Upayavira wrote:
> Bug and nudge on general@incubator.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015, at 04:40 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
> > Is there anything we can do to help with that?
> >
> >
Bug and nudge on general@incubator.
Upayavira
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015, at 04:40 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
> Is there anything we can do to help with that?
>
>
>
>
> On 11/14/15, 6:07 AM, "Ali Lown" a...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>
> >I am trying to get enough votes from IPMC, we need 3 but only ha
Is there anything we can do to help with that?
On 11/14/15, 6:07 AM, "Ali Lown" wrote:
>I am trying to get enough votes from IPMC, we need 3 but only have 2
>currently (Justin, Christian).
>
>Ali
>
>On 14 November 2015 at 00:25, Evan Hughes wrote:
>> Is the release still stuck due to the iss
I am trying to get enough votes from IPMC, we need 3 but only have 2
currently (Justin, Christian).
Ali
On 14 November 2015 at 00:25, Evan Hughes wrote:
> Is the release still stuck due to the issue the general member is having?
> On 06/11/2015 4:13 AM, "Upayavira" wrote:
>
>> Ahh, got it. What
Is the release still stuck due to the issue the general member is having?
On 06/11/2015 4:13 AM, "Upayavira" wrote:
> Ahh, got it. What you meant was:
> 6 committer votes
> 1 mentor vote
> 4 non-binding
>
> I took it to mean 6 votes total, of which 1 mentor and 4 non-bonding.
>
> Clarity sh
Ahh, got it. What you meant was:
6 committer votes
1 mentor vote
4 non-binding
I took it to mean 6 votes total, of which 1 mentor and 4 non-bonding.
Clarity shines forth, thank you.
Are you now in a position to forward this to general@incubator?
Thx
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015, at 05:10 PM, Ali
Upayavira,
Am I overlooking something?
I definitely wrote 6 committer votes (+1 mentor vote) in the email
dated 3rd November.
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Ali
On 3 November
Congrats Ali, and good luck with your future plans!
Can I ask you to check those tallies? I'm sure there are more
committer/PPMC member votes than two.
Upayavira
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 03:22 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for taking part in verifying this release candidate, it is
> g
Hi all,
Thanks for taking part in verifying this release candidate, it is
great to finally be able to take a potential release to the others in
the incubator!
(I apologize for not following up sooner, I have finally graduated
from Uni, so am now sorting out what comes next...)
These results super
Ok,
I am revising the legal perspective today.
On 10/20/15, 6:40 PM, "Upayavira" wrote:
>As far as I'm concerned, you can still vote on the existing thread.
>Please vote from a legal perspective rather than a technical one.
>
>The timeframe is set to ensure people have the ability to vote -
As far as I'm concerned, you can still vote on the existing thread.
Please vote from a legal perspective rather than a technical one.
The timeframe is set to ensure people have the ability to vote - it
isn't a requirement that it completes within a specific timeframe.
thx.
Upayavira
On Mon, Oct
All,
I still find the Wave project quite interesting and am more than happy to help.
I just haven’t really felt the pull of the community. If I thought there we
something specific I could do to help I would be more than happy. I would like
to see the release finally happen. Even if we event
Non-binding votes have a different value. If we had insufficient
committer/PPMC votes but loads of quality (I.e not drive by) non-binding
votes, it would suggest we have a different problem, and could look how
to addresss that.
Upayavira
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015, at 09:33 PM, Zachary Yaro wrote:
> I
I think we should try to contact some of them again and see if we can get
the vote over. If we fail again - then we should move away.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 8:35 AM Evan Hughes wrote:
> woops thought monday was the cutoff
>
> On 18 October 2015 at 12:33, Zachary Yaro wrote:
>
> > I would have
woops thought monday was the cutoff
On 18 October 2015 at 12:33, Zachary Yaro wrote:
> I would have cast a vote, but I read non-binding votes were discouraged.
> To clarify, what are the criteria for being able to cast a binding vote for
> this project?
>
> Zachary Yaro
>
> On 17 October 2015 at
I would have cast a vote, but I read non-binding votes were discouraged.
To clarify, what are the criteria for being able to cast a binding vote for
this project?
Zachary Yaro
On 17 October 2015 at 21:48, Ali Lown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks to Yuri and Jeremy for downloading and trying out thi
27 matches
Mail list logo
