I would have cast a vote, but I read non-binding votes were discouraged. To clarify, what are the criteria for being able to cast a binding vote for this project?
Zachary Yaro On 17 October 2015 at 21:48, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks to Yuri and Jeremy for downloading and trying out this RC. > > Well, I set a "deadline" around the 17th October which has now well > and truly passed. > > My vote on the matter was a +1 (though I realize that I failed to put > this in my original email, so you are allowed to ignore this for > failing to meet my own deadline). > > The result looks something like (including mine): > +1: 3 (2 binding) > +0: 0 > -0: 0 > -1: 0 > > Unfortunately we have had insufficient votes to meet the release > requirement (minimum of 3 +1 binding votes, more + than -) [0]. > Binding votes as decided by people in [1]. > > @Yuri/Jeremy: How do you feel now about us moving away from Apache, as > this vote does seem to suggest that there is not enough interest from > the currently defined committers to maintain this project here. > > I am not really sure why none of the other committers responded at all > to the vote... > > Ali > > [0]: > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification > [1]: https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#wave > > On 14 October 2015 at 17:27, Jérémy Naegel <jeremy....@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > > > +Jérémy Naegel <http://google.com/+JérémyNaegel > <http://google.com/+J%C3%A9r%C3%A9myNaegel>> > > Public Information Officer > > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> I did the following: > >> - Checked signatures > >> - Opened the binary and verified it works. > >> - Opened the source and verified that it can be built and works. > >> - Reviewed the changes for the rc 10. > >> > >> Ali - Thanks for making this RC! > >> > >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:59 AM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > RC10 is now available for review. > >> > Artefacts can be found here: > >> > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc10/ > >> > (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha') > >> > > >> > I have included both source and binary artefacts for convenience. > >> > > >> > The release version (if successful) will be 0.4.0-incubating > >> > > >> > This is taken from the branch 0.4.0-rc10 of the incubator-wave > >> repository. > >> > > >> > Notable changes since earlier initial release attempts include: > >> > - Use of typesafe config > >> > - Bumped versions of Jetty, GWT, etc. > >> > - Assorted tweaks to build system > >> > > >> > A summary of useful information can be found in RELEASE-NOTES, and a > >> > list of changes in CHANGES in the source artefacts. > >> > > >> > Action Required: > >> > Please go and test these packages (most importantly the source ones) > >> > for any outstanding legal problems, or any runtime problems in a > >> > 'standard' configuration. > >> > > >> > We are not looking for a perfect first release, as there is plenty of > >> > time to fix outstanding bugs in future releases, but we do want to get > >> > 0.4 out soon (at long last). > >> > > >> > This vote will close around 0000 GMT 17th October 2015. > >> > > >> > [ ] +1 Release it! > >> > [ ] +0 Ok, but... > >> > [ ] -0 Ok, but you really should fix... > >> > [ ] -1 Definitely do not release this because... > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Ali > >> > > >> >
