Someone needs to just agitate on general@incubator to find a volunteer or two to review our release.
Once it has received three +1 votes from Incubator PMC members, it will be an official incubator release and we are done with that task. Upayavira On Wed, Dec 23, 2015, at 02:23 PM, Yuri Z wrote: > @Ali @Upayavira > Is the release still stuck? > Are there any issues can be addressed to finalize the release? > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:01 PM Michael MacFadden < > michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Ok, > > > > I am revising the legal perspective today. > > > > > > > > > > On 10/20/15, 6:40 PM, "Upayavira" <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > > >As far as I'm concerned, you can still vote on the existing thread. > > >Please vote from a legal perspective rather than a technical one. > > > > > >The timeframe is set to ensure people have the ability to vote - it > > >isn't a requirement that it completes within a specific timeframe. > > > > > >thx. > > > > > >Upayavira > > > > > >On Mon, Oct 19, 2015, at 09:39 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote: > > >> All, > > >> > > >> I still find the Wave project quite interesting and am more than happy > > to > > >> help. I just haven’t really felt the pull of the community. If I > > >> thought there we something specific I could do to help I would be more > > >> than happy. I would like to see the release finally happen. Even if we > > >> eventually move away it would be nice to have completed this process > > once > > >> during the life of the project. > > >> > > >> If there is another vote I will participate. I will review the process > > >> and functional status and provide a vote. > > >> > > >> So you can count me in. > > >> > > >> ~Michael > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 10/18/15, 4:56 AM, "Upayavira" <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > >> > > >> >Non-binding votes have a different value. If we had insufficient > > >> >committer/PPMC votes but loads of quality (I.e not drive by) > > non-binding > > >> >votes, it would suggest we have a different problem, and could look how > > >> >to addresss that. > > >> > > > >> >Upayavira > > >> > > > >> >On Sat, Oct 17, 2015, at 09:33 PM, Zachary Yaro wrote: > > >> >> I would have cast a vote, but I read non-binding votes were > > discouraged. > > >> >> To clarify, what are the criteria for being able to cast a binding > > vote > > >> >> for > > >> >> this project? > > >> >> > > >> >> Zachary Yaro > > >> >> > > >> >> On 17 October 2015 at 21:48, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> > Hi all, > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Thanks to Yuri and Jeremy for downloading and trying out this RC. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Well, I set a "deadline" around the 17th October which has now well > > >> >> > and truly passed. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > My vote on the matter was a +1 (though I realize that I failed to > > put > > >> >> > this in my original email, so you are allowed to ignore this for > > >> >> > failing to meet my own deadline). > > >> >> > > > >> >> > The result looks something like (including mine): > > >> >> > +1: 3 (2 binding) > > >> >> > +0: 0 > > >> >> > -0: 0 > > >> >> > -1: 0 > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Unfortunately we have had insufficient votes to meet the release > > >> >> > requirement (minimum of 3 +1 binding votes, more + than -) [0]. > > >> >> > Binding votes as decided by people in [1]. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > @Yuri/Jeremy: How do you feel now about us moving away from > > Apache, as > > >> >> > this vote does seem to suggest that there is not enough interest > > from > > >> >> > the currently defined committers to maintain this project here. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > I am not really sure why none of the other committers responded at > > all > > >> >> > to the vote... > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Ali > > >> >> > > > >> >> > [0]: > > >> >> > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification > > >> >> > [1]: https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#wave > > >> >> > > > >> >> > On 14 October 2015 at 17:27, Jérémy Naegel <jeremy....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> >> > > +1 > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > +Jérémy Naegel <http://google.com/+JérémyNaegel > > <http://google.com/+J%C3%A9r%C3%A9myNaegel> > > >> >> > <http://google.com/+J%C3%A9r%C3%A9myNaegel>> > > >> >> > > Public Information Officer > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > >> +1 > > >> >> > >> I did the following: > > >> >> > >> - Checked signatures > > >> >> > >> - Opened the binary and verified it works. > > >> >> > >> - Opened the source and verified that it can be built and works. > > >> >> > >> - Reviewed the changes for the rc 10. > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> Ali - Thanks for making this RC! > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:59 AM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> > > wrote: > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > Hi all, > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > RC10 is now available for review. > > >> >> > >> > Artefacts can be found here: > > >> >> > >> > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc10/ > > >> >> > >> > (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > > > $f.sha') > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > I have included both source and binary artefacts for > > convenience. > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > The release version (if successful) will be 0.4.0-incubating > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > This is taken from the branch 0.4.0-rc10 of the incubator-wave > > >> >> > >> repository. > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > Notable changes since earlier initial release attempts > > include: > > >> >> > >> > - Use of typesafe config > > >> >> > >> > - Bumped versions of Jetty, GWT, etc. > > >> >> > >> > - Assorted tweaks to build system > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > A summary of useful information can be found in > > RELEASE-NOTES, and a > > >> >> > >> > list of changes in CHANGES in the source artefacts. > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > Action Required: > > >> >> > >> > Please go and test these packages (most importantly the > > source ones) > > >> >> > >> > for any outstanding legal problems, or any runtime problems > > in a > > >> >> > >> > 'standard' configuration. > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > We are not looking for a perfect first release, as there is > > plenty of > > >> >> > >> > time to fix outstanding bugs in future releases, but we do > > want to get > > >> >> > >> > 0.4 out soon (at long last). > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > This vote will close around 0000 GMT 17th October 2015. > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > [ ] +1 Release it! > > >> >> > >> > [ ] +0 Ok, but... > > >> >> > >> > [ ] -0 Ok, but you really should fix... > > >> >> > >> > [ ] -1 Definitely do not release this because... > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > Thanks, > > >> >> > >> > Ali > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >
