Congrats Ali, and good luck with your future plans! Can I ask you to check those tallies? I'm sure there are more committer/PPMC member votes than two.
Upayavira On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 03:22 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for taking part in verifying this release candidate, it is > great to finally be able to take a potential release to the others in > the incubator! > (I apologize for not following up sooner, I have finally graduated > from Uni, so am now sorting out what comes next...) > > These results supersede the email I sent dated 18th October, with the > results now looking like: > > +1: 6 (+1 mentor, +4 non-binding) > +0: 0 > -0: 0 > -1: 0 > > Ali > > On 18 October 2015 at 02:48, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Thanks to Yuri and Jeremy for downloading and trying out this RC. > > > > Well, I set a "deadline" around the 17th October which has now well > > and truly passed. > > > > My vote on the matter was a +1 (though I realize that I failed to put > > this in my original email, so you are allowed to ignore this for > > failing to meet my own deadline). > > > > The result looks something like (including mine): > > +1: 3 (2 binding) > > +0: 0 > > -0: 0 > > -1: 0 > > > > Unfortunately we have had insufficient votes to meet the release > > requirement (minimum of 3 +1 binding votes, more + than -) [0]. > > Binding votes as decided by people in [1]. > > > > @Yuri/Jeremy: How do you feel now about us moving away from Apache, as > > this vote does seem to suggest that there is not enough interest from > > the currently defined committers to maintain this project here. > > > > I am not really sure why none of the other committers responded at all > > to the vote... > > > > Ali > > > > [0]: > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification > > [1]: https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#wave > > > > On 14 October 2015 at 17:27, Jérémy Naegel <jeremy....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 > >> > >> +Jérémy Naegel <http://google.com/+JérémyNaegel> > >> Public Information Officer > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> I did the following: > >>> - Checked signatures > >>> - Opened the binary and verified it works. > >>> - Opened the source and verified that it can be built and works. > >>> - Reviewed the changes for the rc 10. > >>> > >>> Ali - Thanks for making this RC! > >>> > >>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:59 AM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >>> > >>> > Hi all, > >>> > > >>> > RC10 is now available for review. > >>> > Artefacts can be found here: > >>> > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc10/ > >>> > (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha') > >>> > > >>> > I have included both source and binary artefacts for convenience. > >>> > > >>> > The release version (if successful) will be 0.4.0-incubating > >>> > > >>> > This is taken from the branch 0.4.0-rc10 of the incubator-wave > >>> repository. > >>> > > >>> > Notable changes since earlier initial release attempts include: > >>> > - Use of typesafe config > >>> > - Bumped versions of Jetty, GWT, etc. > >>> > - Assorted tweaks to build system > >>> > > >>> > A summary of useful information can be found in RELEASE-NOTES, and a > >>> > list of changes in CHANGES in the source artefacts. > >>> > > >>> > Action Required: > >>> > Please go and test these packages (most importantly the source ones) > >>> > for any outstanding legal problems, or any runtime problems in a > >>> > 'standard' configuration. > >>> > > >>> > We are not looking for a perfect first release, as there is plenty of > >>> > time to fix outstanding bugs in future releases, but we do want to get > >>> > 0.4 out soon (at long last). > >>> > > >>> > This vote will close around 0000 GMT 17th October 2015. > >>> > > >>> > [ ] +1 Release it! > >>> > [ ] +0 Ok, but... > >>> > [ ] -0 Ok, but you really should fix... > >>> > [ ] -1 Definitely do not release this because... > >>> > > >>> > Thanks, > >>> > Ali > >>> > > >>>
