Is there anything we can do to help with that?
On 11/14/15, 6:07 AM, "Ali Lown" <a.lo...@gmail.com on behalf of a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >I am trying to get enough votes from IPMC, we need 3 but only have 2 >currently (Justin, Christian). > >Ali > >On 14 November 2015 at 00:25, Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Is the release still stuck due to the issue the general member is having? >> On 06/11/2015 4:13 AM, "Upayavira" <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> Ahh, got it. What you meant was: >>> 6 committer votes >>> 1 mentor vote >>> 4 non-binding >>> >>> I took it to mean 6 votes total, of which 1 mentor and 4 non-bonding. >>> >>> Clarity shines forth, thank you. >>> >>> Are you now in a position to forward this to general@incubator? >>> >>> Thx >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015, at 05:10 PM, Ali Lown wrote: >>> > Upayavira, >>> > >>> > Am I overlooking something? >>> > >>> > I definitely wrote 6 committer votes (+1 mentor vote) in the email >>> > dated 3rd November. >>> > >>> > >>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E >>> > >>> > Ali >>> > >>> > On 3 November 2015 at 19:46, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: >>> > > Congrats Ali, and good luck with your future plans! >>> > > >>> > > Can I ask you to check those tallies? I'm sure there are more >>> > > committer/PPMC member votes than two. >>> > > >>> > > Upayavira >>> > > >>> > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 03:22 PM, Ali Lown wrote: >>> > >> Hi all, >>> > >> >>> > >> Thanks for taking part in verifying this release candidate, it is >>> > >> great to finally be able to take a potential release to the others in >>> > >> the incubator! >>> > >> (I apologize for not following up sooner, I have finally graduated >>> > >> from Uni, so am now sorting out what comes next...) >>> > >> >>> > >> These results supersede the email I sent dated 18th October, with the >>> > >> results now looking like: >>> > >> >>> > >> +1: 6 (+1 mentor, +4 non-binding) >>> > >> +0: 0 >>> > >> -0: 0 >>> > >> -1: 0 >>> > >> >>> > >> Ali >>> > >> >>> > >> On 18 October 2015 at 02:48, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >>> > >> > Hi all, >>> > >> > >>> > >> > Thanks to Yuri and Jeremy for downloading and trying out this RC. >>> > >> > >>> > >> > Well, I set a "deadline" around the 17th October which has now well >>> > >> > and truly passed. >>> > >> > >>> > >> > My vote on the matter was a +1 (though I realize that I failed to >>> put >>> > >> > this in my original email, so you are allowed to ignore this for >>> > >> > failing to meet my own deadline). >>> > >> > >>> > >> > The result looks something like (including mine): >>> > >> > +1: 3 (2 binding) >>> > >> > +0: 0 >>> > >> > -0: 0 >>> > >> > -1: 0 >>> > >> > >>> > >> > Unfortunately we have had insufficient votes to meet the release >>> > >> > requirement (minimum of 3 +1 binding votes, more + than -) [0]. >>> > >> > Binding votes as decided by people in [1]. >>> > >> > >>> > >> > @Yuri/Jeremy: How do you feel now about us moving away from Apache, >>> as >>> > >> > this vote does seem to suggest that there is not enough interest >>> from >>> > >> > the currently defined committers to maintain this project here. >>> > >> > >>> > >> > I am not really sure why none of the other committers responded at >>> all >>> > >> > to the vote... >>> > >> > >>> > >> > Ali >>> > >> > >>> > >> > [0]: >>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification >>> > >> > [1]: https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#wave >>> > >> > >>> > >> > On 14 October 2015 at 17:27, Jérémy Naegel <jeremy....@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >> >> +1 >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> +Jérémy Naegel <http://google.com/+JérémyNaegel >>> <http://google.com/+J%C3%A9r%C3%A9myNaegel>> >>> > >> >> Public Information Officer >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >>> +1 >>> > >> >>> I did the following: >>> > >> >>> - Checked signatures >>> > >> >>> - Opened the binary and verified it works. >>> > >> >>> - Opened the source and verified that it can be built and works. >>> > >> >>> - Reviewed the changes for the rc 10. >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> Ali - Thanks for making this RC! >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:59 AM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> > Hi all, >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > RC10 is now available for review. >>> > >> >>> > Artefacts can be found here: >>> > >> >>> > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc10/ >>> > >> >>> > (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > >>> $f.sha') >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > I have included both source and binary artefacts for >>> convenience. >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > The release version (if successful) will be 0.4.0-incubating >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > This is taken from the branch 0.4.0-rc10 of the incubator-wave >>> > >> >>> repository. >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > Notable changes since earlier initial release attempts include: >>> > >> >>> > - Use of typesafe config >>> > >> >>> > - Bumped versions of Jetty, GWT, etc. >>> > >> >>> > - Assorted tweaks to build system >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > A summary of useful information can be found in RELEASE-NOTES, >>> and a >>> > >> >>> > list of changes in CHANGES in the source artefacts. >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > Action Required: >>> > >> >>> > Please go and test these packages (most importantly the source >>> ones) >>> > >> >>> > for any outstanding legal problems, or any runtime problems in a >>> > >> >>> > 'standard' configuration. >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > We are not looking for a perfect first release, as there is >>> plenty of >>> > >> >>> > time to fix outstanding bugs in future releases, but we do want >>> to get >>> > >> >>> > 0.4 out soon (at long last). >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > This vote will close around 0000 GMT 17th October 2015. >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > [ ] +1 Release it! >>> > >> >>> > [ ] +0 Ok, but... >>> > >> >>> > [ ] -0 Ok, but you really should fix... >>> > >> >>> > [ ] -1 Definitely do not release this because... >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > Thanks, >>> > >> >>> > Ali >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> >>>
