Not quite the same. The project has put the release to the Incubator PMC. If they do not respond, it isn't the Wave community's fault. So, in the board report, you can state that you are waiting on the Incubator PMC to complete your I first release vote.
Upayavira On Sun, Nov 29, 2015, at 10:15 AM, Evan Hughes wrote: > Im assuming since we havnt heard anything the situation is still the > same? > > On 17 November 2015 at 03:33, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > Bug and nudge on general@incubator. > > > > Upayavira > > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015, at 04:40 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote: > > > Is there anything we can do to help with that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/14/15, 6:07 AM, "Ali Lown" <a.lo...@gmail.com on behalf of > > > a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > > >I am trying to get enough votes from IPMC, we need 3 but only have 2 > > > >currently (Justin, Christian). > > > > > > > >Ali > > > > > > > >On 14 November 2015 at 00:25, Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Is the release still stuck due to the issue the general member is > > having? > > > >> On 06/11/2015 4:13 AM, "Upayavira" <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Ahh, got it. What you meant was: > > > >>> 6 committer votes > > > >>> 1 mentor vote > > > >>> 4 non-binding > > > >>> > > > >>> I took it to mean 6 votes total, of which 1 mentor and 4 non-bonding. > > > >>> > > > >>> Clarity shines forth, thank you. > > > >>> > > > >>> Are you now in a position to forward this to general@incubator? > > > >>> > > > >>> Thx > > > >>> > > > >>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015, at 05:10 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > > > >>> > Upayavira, > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Am I overlooking something? > > > >>> > > > > >>> > I definitely wrote 6 committer votes (+1 mentor vote) in the email > > > >>> > dated 3rd November. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Ali > > > >>> > > > > >>> > On 3 November 2015 at 19:46, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > >>> > > Congrats Ali, and good luck with your future plans! > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > Can I ask you to check those tallies? I'm sure there are more > > > >>> > > committer/PPMC member votes than two. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > Upayavira > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 03:22 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > > > >>> > >> Hi all, > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> Thanks for taking part in verifying this release candidate, it > > is > > > >>> > >> great to finally be able to take a potential release to the > > others in > > > >>> > >> the incubator! > > > >>> > >> (I apologize for not following up sooner, I have finally > > graduated > > > >>> > >> from Uni, so am now sorting out what comes next...) > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> These results supersede the email I sent dated 18th October, > > with the > > > >>> > >> results now looking like: > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> +1: 6 (+1 mentor, +4 non-binding) > > > >>> > >> +0: 0 > > > >>> > >> -0: 0 > > > >>> > >> -1: 0 > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> Ali > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> On 18 October 2015 at 02:48, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > > > >>> > >> > Hi all, > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > Thanks to Yuri and Jeremy for downloading and trying out this > > RC. > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > Well, I set a "deadline" around the 17th October which has > > now well > > > >>> > >> > and truly passed. > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > My vote on the matter was a +1 (though I realize that I > > failed to > > > >>> put > > > >>> > >> > this in my original email, so you are allowed to ignore this > > for > > > >>> > >> > failing to meet my own deadline). > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > The result looks something like (including mine): > > > >>> > >> > +1: 3 (2 binding) > > > >>> > >> > +0: 0 > > > >>> > >> > -0: 0 > > > >>> > >> > -1: 0 > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > Unfortunately we have had insufficient votes to meet the > > release > > > >>> > >> > requirement (minimum of 3 +1 binding votes, more + than -) > > [0]. > > > >>> > >> > Binding votes as decided by people in [1]. > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > @Yuri/Jeremy: How do you feel now about us moving away from > > Apache, > > > >>> as > > > >>> > >> > this vote does seem to suggest that there is not enough > > interest > > > >>> from > > > >>> > >> > the currently defined committers to maintain this project > > here. > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > I am not really sure why none of the other committers > > responded at > > > >>> all > > > >>> > >> > to the vote... > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > Ali > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > [0]: > > > >>> > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification > > > >>> > >> > [1]: > > https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#wave > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > On 14 October 2015 at 17:27, Jérémy Naegel < > > jeremy....@gmail.com> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > >> >> +1 > > > >>> > >> >> > > > >>> > >> >> +Jérémy Naegel <http://google.com/+JérémyNaegel > > <http://google.com/+J%C3%A9r%C3%A9myNaegel> > > > >>> <http://google.com/+J%C3%A9r%C3%A9myNaegel>> > > > >>> > >> >> Public Information Officer > > > >>> > >> >> > > > >>> > >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >>> > >> >> > > > >>> > >> >>> +1 > > > >>> > >> >>> I did the following: > > > >>> > >> >>> - Checked signatures > > > >>> > >> >>> - Opened the binary and verified it works. > > > >>> > >> >>> - Opened the source and verified that it can be built and > > works. > > > >>> > >> >>> - Reviewed the changes for the rc 10. > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > >>> > >> >>> Ali - Thanks for making this RC! > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > >>> > >> >>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:59 AM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> > > wrote: > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > >>> > >> >>> > Hi all, > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > > >>> > >> >>> > RC10 is now available for review. > > > >>> > >> >>> > Artefacts can be found here: > > > >>> > >> >>> > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc10/ > > > >>> > >> >>> > (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > > > > >>> $f.sha') > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > > >>> > >> >>> > I have included both source and binary artefacts for > > > >>> convenience. > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > > >>> > >> >>> > The release version (if successful) will be > > 0.4.0-incubating > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > > >>> > >> >>> > This is taken from the branch 0.4.0-rc10 of the > > incubator-wave > > > >>> > >> >>> repository. > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > > >>> > >> >>> > Notable changes since earlier initial release attempts > > include: > > > >>> > >> >>> > - Use of typesafe config > > > >>> > >> >>> > - Bumped versions of Jetty, GWT, etc. > > > >>> > >> >>> > - Assorted tweaks to build system > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > > >>> > >> >>> > A summary of useful information can be found in > > RELEASE-NOTES, > > > >>> and a > > > >>> > >> >>> > list of changes in CHANGES in the source artefacts. > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > > >>> > >> >>> > Action Required: > > > >>> > >> >>> > Please go and test these packages (most importantly the > > source > > > >>> ones) > > > >>> > >> >>> > for any outstanding legal problems, or any runtime > > problems in a > > > >>> > >> >>> > 'standard' configuration. > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > > >>> > >> >>> > We are not looking for a perfect first release, as there > > is > > > >>> plenty of > > > >>> > >> >>> > time to fix outstanding bugs in future releases, but we > > do want > > > >>> to get > > > >>> > >> >>> > 0.4 out soon (at long last). > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > > >>> > >> >>> > This vote will close around 0000 GMT 17th October 2015. > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > > >>> > >> >>> > [ ] +1 Release it! > > > >>> > >> >>> > [ ] +0 Ok, but... > > > >>> > >> >>> > [ ] -0 Ok, but you really should fix... > > > >>> > >> >>> > [ ] -1 Definitely do not release this because... > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > > >>> > >> >>> > Thanks, > > > >>> > >> >>> > Ali > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > >>> > > > > >
