There's no doubt that Wave SHOULD federate efficiently. But there's also no
doubt that it doesn't. So, sadly, I have to agree - time to make Apache
Wave do what it can do a bit better.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
web: johnblossom.com
I vote for release.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 2:58 AM, Ali Lown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> RC10 is now available for review.
> Artefacts can be found here:
> https://people
e point that you're ready to "make a
statement" with this project. The world of Wave has not run away in the
meantime, so I hope that there is great potential for this to still take
off. I agree with your scope of vision - the Web as a whole is stuck, Wave
threatened to unstick it,
Fine, just checking. I think that it looks quite impressive. Can't wait to
see more.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Zachary Yaro wrote:
> I doubt that can be copyrighted. P
This looks very, very nice so far. Are there any copyright issues with the
use of the leading alpha for the non-photoed user icons? Google uses that
in Gmail...
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 4
Id be glad to listen in, but since I am not a technical contributor, I will
try mostly just to monitor.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Evan Hughes wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> could
that will support sync/async
collaboration and store-forward data models.
Would like to see Wave 3.0 ideas considered.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
> On 24 Ma
alled-garden instances, which defeats the value of Wave.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
> Yeah, I also think the only way we can have a breakthrough is by making it
> re
@Kenton, I am very excited by this development. If we can get Wave
federation working on Sandstorm.io efficiently and simply, I think that
this could be a huge breakthrough for Apache Wave - and beyond! J
Hi wave-dev,
>
> I thought you'd be interested to know that we've ported Wave to
> Sandstorm.
Looks like you're making bood progress with ShareJS, Joseph, still some
hurdles but the community is making progress. As you point out in the
ShareJS literature, more work is needed to get binaries to intersperse
messages with text/rich text.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmai
Thomas,
That's the key - if the coding model isn't right, the apps and the data
model will never take off. We'll continue to see proprietary dead-end after
dead-end.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On W
eople walk around a field of sensors
and combine those messages in a common wave with human communications such
as text and voice. Some apps would expose the data, others would deal with
just the conversations, and so on.
Best,
John Blossom
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:06 AM, 田传武 wrote:
> inli
This is very cool indeed. It looks as if it might be able to support the
Wave 3.0 data model:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1pNsrX26947QH89Ot3k62nlKKSRFLmVgBWxcIEne8VYI/edit?usp=sharing
All the best,
John Blossom
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 2:07 AM, 田传武 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I&
IMO, of course.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
> Well, let me put it like this for my end;
> As soon as there is a open API that allows persistent, yet
I have a lot on my plate but I am looking more seriously at crowdfunding
for Wave 3.0. The only way that I see Wave taking off is with clearly
segregated and secure APIs for mobile apps that interface with
apps-independent distributed waves.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
But is the app "segregated" enough now that you can still get the
functionality that one requires for concurrent edits, etc.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
> There's a sudden spike in traffic volume for the waveinabox.net - about
> 2500 hits during the last few hours. The traffic com
Interesting.
All the best,
John Blossom
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
> Thanks
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>
> > It was on hackernews.
> > On 4 Apr 2014 21:36, "Yuri Z" wrote:
> >
> > > There'
Is this an inflection point at which one could consider moving away from
Java? For mobile use, it's not ideal.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
> Hi
> As Java 8
Get git.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> As one of the main contention points, lets get Wave moved off the
> git-svn life support, and in to a true git repo
Time to go, we need a new way to turn thoughts into action, knowing that we
may yet come back to Apache in a more usable form.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>
Thanks, Kirill, I look forward to seeing the results!
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Kirill Kostyuchenko
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We still working hard on wave in our company
Good points, Bruno, I think that you summed it up very well. I'd only add
that in theory the broader Apache community should act as a draw for the
project, but the social infrastructure for Apache doesn't seem to amplify
that value for Wave. A more flexible approach might help to get a core
group o
ls of
permissioning, then you have the opportunity to walk around monitoring
issues - sometimes literally.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
> "nsa-resistan
ve on. If I get
involved in this again, my timeline is probably more aggressive, for those
who want to seek funding sooner.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Joseph Gentle wrote:
> Will
nications. Nkommo can't really move forward without that combo.
As for the name, all things are possible once it's on Github, it seems. A
fresh start might be in order.
Please keep me in the loop, I'd be glad to help push things in this
direction. Without funding, we're n
clear that Github-centered
development may change this significantly, but it may help, and it would
certainly simplify branding efforts and possibly fund-raising.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:01
on. If there are team members
who feel that I can contribute positively in this transition, feel free to
stay in touch.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi fol
the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> The time has finally come, after many weeks of anticipation: RC4 is
> now available for review.
>
> Major changes inclu
Would love to help!
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Joseph Gentle wrote:
> tldr; I need some volunteers to collaboratively edit a document
> together, so we can systemat
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:04 PM, John Blossom wrote:
> > Social Media guidelines are up, I made a few minor tweaks to bring the
> > Cloud Stack template up to date.
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.o
Is
> there a way to use OTR?
>
> This stuff is more important than figuring out our mobile strategy for now.
>
> -J
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:15 AM, John Blossom wrote:
> > Thanks to Alex North, Ali Lown, Bruno Gonzalez, Jérémy Naegel, and Joseph
> > Gent
Social Media guidelines are up, I made a few minor tweaks to bring the
Cloud Stack template up to date.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Apache+Wave+Social+Media+Guidelines
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:51 PM, John Blossom wrote:
> Ali,
>
> Great suggestion on guideli
first put together a page of guidelines on the wiki? (Like
> CloudStack has:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/social-media-guidelines.html)
>
> Ali
> On 31 Jul 2013 19:26, "John Blossom" wrote:
>
> > In conjunction with the Hangouts, I'd like to suggest t
as admins, I don't think there
> should
> > be a problem.
> >
> > Could you first put together a page of guidelines on the wiki? (Like
> > CloudStack has:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/social-media-guidelines.html)
> >
> > Ali
> > On 31 Jul 20
t and links to the official project Web site.
Thoughts? It's very easy to set up, BTW.
All the best,
John Blossom
know that a Hangout is the place to solve that,
this is probable the best place to start. In the meantime, I will be glad
to help create a new "office hours" event on Hangout and have people decide
what they want to discuss. Thanks to everyone who participated, the
logistics seem to have
Yes, the community needs to buy in to common communication. That said,
everyone's invited to view or participate in Wednesday's Hangout and the
results will be posted here, just as with any other interaction in the
project.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail
Michael, will you be able to join us on the Hangout this Wednesday?
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Michael MacFadden <
michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks l
Yes, Joseph, the goal is to use the disciplines of Apache open source
development to build a platform that will rock the world. The disciplines
are important, but a sustainable, maintainable platform is the real goal
that the disciplines facilitate.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos
Thanks, Michael, Ali, if you could please confirm that you'll be able to
attend, that would be great. Any concerns, please don't hesitate to bring
them up now, thanks.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
O
forward to more visibility and awareness. That will help to attract more
developers, projects, etc.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro
wrote:
> I also supp
ching developers and tech product teams.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Joseph Gentle wrote:
> Speaking of which, I'd like to start actually using wave in this
> community.
I am all in for that, Joseph, absolutely. The sooner that we get a
project/Apache consensus for "eating our own dogfood," the better. Apache
Wave has the potential to become a killer project management tool.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
goog
best ways to use a tool like Google Hangouts effectively that fits in with
project guidelines.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
events comments to clarify the context. I am hoping that this will be
sufficient - the listserv itself is not the most effective meeting
scheduler.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:44 AM
el on a
more regular basis. I am also totally for more impromptu efforts, but for
the sake of the community if we can post our conversations for
community-wide access, that can help.
Best Regards,
John Blossom
President
Shore Communications Inc.
where content, technology and people meet.
e to view it via YouTube via a link that I'll post here.
I do want to start accelerating communications more in the community, but
this is a busy week.
Best Regards,
John Blossom
President
Shore Communications Inc.
where content, technology and people meet. (Salesmark of Shore
Commun
1200 ET, btw - bad math.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:53 AM, John Blossom wrote:
> OK, the consensus time/date for the hangout seems to be Wednesday, 31
> July, 1600 UTC (10
le of invitees.
I Have Joseph's ID already and I believe Ali and Michael also, but if you
have a doubt, just send it along. If you don't make the hangout itself, I
will be sure to share the link here for the common record.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
., ET is UTC+4 right now.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> I agree that another hangout sounds fun.
>
> John, how about setting up a Doodle for us to m
Great, Michael, find a date that works for you that seems to match with
others' interests and I will be glad to arrange for this. We can have the
link available but not make public, if that helps to encourage constructive
participation.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
iting
announcements fairly soon. Time to change the world with Wave!!!
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Joseph Gentle wrote:
> I've had a busy few weeks - gearing up to launch o
Especially in the latter case of developing nations - but also for mobile
users in general - enabling offline modes with synchronisation after an
indefinite period is a must.
John
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
Soo...how is this initiative going? How may I help to move it forward?
Best Regards,
John Blossom
President
Shore Communications Inc.
where content, technology and people meet. (Salesmark of Shore
Communications Inc.)
web: shore.com
blog: contentblogger.com
email: jblos...@shore.com
phone
Ali,
Thanks so much, thoughts below. Best, John
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Ali Lown wrote:
> Heh. This saves us having to write an [ANNOUNCE] for you...
>
FIRST! Tee hee.
>
> > One key thing that I'd like to chip away at is getting our Web presences
> > sussed out a bit more. Web sites/ow
ys glad to communicate in this
channel as project protocol requires, as well as other channels which may
help to accelerate the efficiency of this channel.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
Ingenious, Torben, certainly adds efficiency. John
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Torben Weis wrote:
> 2013/6/25 Joseph Gentle
>
> >
> > >> When peers connect, they send each other missing ops. Figuring out
> > >> which ops are missing can be surprisingly tricky - but we'll figure
> > >> that
Hello,
As some of you may be aware, one of the platforms from which I am
advocating for the renewal of Apache Wave development is to devise
communications that will be well-configured for "the next billion people"
coming online. The specific project that I am starting to gear up towards
this end i
Thank you, Michael, for my new vast, cosmic powers! ;-)
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Michael MacFadden <
michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> John,
>
> I have given you wiki permissions!
>
> ~Michael
>
>
>
Sounds like we need a Hangout with an online whiteboard or such to work
this out...? John
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Sam Nelson wrote:
> +1 for structured wiki pages.
>
> I re-read the original email a few times now and I still get a little bit
> lost around the bit of ancestor count - com
Michael, I do have a confluence login on the Apache Wave wiki, thanks for
your help
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Michael MacFadden <
michael.macfad...@gmail.com>
Thank you! Glad to have your help.
BTW, how does one add oneself to be an editor of the wiki? Anyone? Thanks.
John Blossom
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Thanks all!
>
> I have subscribed myself now
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 6:45 PM, John
we're to support
history/playback readily, but I suppose that's the fun of the challenge. If
we crack with with P2P in tow, then we've really got something.
All the best,
John Blossom
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Joseph Gentle wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Ali L
It's perhaps superficial, but if you call these "working groups" then
perhaps that takes away some of the hoop-jumping perception. These are
sub-communities which try to attract people who can help to solve specific
problems. I like the scheme.
On Joseph's point 1a, I think that it would be accept
y wasn't possible to
> >communicate between two browsers without a sever between them.
> >
> >or does p2p mean something different in this context?
> >
> >On 22 June 2013 18:53, John Blossom wrote:
> >> Michael,
> >>
> >> I like that way
a, in order to "open the eyes" of those drawn to this mailing
> >list, might it be beneficial to build up a wiki page of accepted use
> >cases so that everyone can read them and take them into account when
> >considering different ideas? That'd facilitate discussio
I've appreciated your help and insight, glad to have you aboard. Best, John
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Hello Wave'rs,
>
> as you might know, I am Apache Member and involved in various
> projects. I also have mentored a bunch of podlings, like for example
> Open
We're getting ready to rock...J
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro
wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
>
> —Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro
>
>
> On 21 June 2013 18:37, Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak) >wrote:
>
> > Nice, can't wait to test your P2P experiments :-)
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 21
Thanks so much, Michael, that's a great help. If we can get some funding
for Wave project development perhaps some of the funding can be reserved
for open source hosting services on an ongoing basis via a nonprofit entity.
All the best,
John Blossom
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Mi
Glad to participate as requested, though this is primarily the developers'
discussion. John B
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> Perfect.
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 03:57 AM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
> > Upayavira,
> >
> >
> > We will put a wiki page together. We will also h
ncy issues will not be so
severe.
Things to think about, I will look at this more carefully later today.
All the best,
John Blossom
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak) <
sten...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Following Joseph's "A Very Wavey Plan (P2P!)" thre
Joseph,
This is exactly the sort of transformational architecture that I have been
hoping that you and others would pursue. Being fundamentally P2P but
readily adaptable for scalable client-server architecture seems to fit
today's mobile Web well. The three options that you outline might not wind
Thanks for the diagram, Dave, it helps me to visualize Wave's components.
How much is the "wave bus" a reality as opposed to a potential division in
programming? That is, in terms of how one binds/opens the bus, does it
really function as an API.
John Blossom
On Sun, Jun 16, 2
>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> @Fleeky, Yuri actually added some
> > > > >>>> code<
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > &g
lusive.
> Therefore, please use them with restraint, and keep as much discussion,
> and all decisions, here on the list.
>
> Thanks! Upayavira
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013, at 01:37 PM, John Blossom - Shore Communications
> Inc. wrote:
> > In-person would be great. I am NYC/Bo
, we just need to get the
> >> dialogue.rolling, it seems. We can always have more. Say Weds or
> Thursday
> >> around 1700 UT+1? Pick a number. John
> >>
> >> All the best,
> >>
> >> John Blossom
> >>
> >> email: jblos...@
ick a number. John
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Joseph Gentle wrote:
> Sounds interesting. Where is this going to be held? It might be
> interesting for a few people o
ve is not necessarily the same in terms of data models.
All the best,
John Blossom
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> Adding Svante Schubert to the thread, from the ODF Toolkit project.
> He also chairs the subcommittee at OASIS that has been looking at OT
> for change t
:
> > Totally agree with all, we need to get better and do more to just became
> > bigger and better.
> >
> >
> > 2013/6/15 John Blossom
> >
> >> Christian,
> >>
> >> Thanks for clarifying this. One of the factors which I hope that the
Thanks, Rob, it seems that this opens up interesting doors for
down-the-road variants of OpenOffice based on Wave editing models and data
models. The challenge and the opportunity is that Wave's OT model acts on
the body of a document, so conversations and collaborations can become the
body of a mo
o a front facing page to share with people
> >>who
> >> > didnt feel like registering on my wave server.
> >> >
> >> > an openoffice for wave would be extremely usefull, and could have an
> >> > extremely large impact imo. wave is also already
does this, but i kept
> going back to wave because it was actually more responsive, featurefull,
> and actually crashed less.
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 9:29 AM, John Blossom wrote:
>
> > I had the down-the-road thought just now that I wanted to put into
> >
s, it's a sub-project that may help to attract more developers
to Wave technologies.
All the best,
John Blossom
Christian,
Thanks for clarifying this. One of the factors which I hope that the
developers new to Apache consider is that just because one calls their
product open source does not mean that you have the resources to manage an
open source program in a way that will lead to successful product
implem
Sounds like a good idea to have multiple experiments moving forward. Lots
of great ideas floating around now that are worth trying out. Fast-fail is
the order of the day for the moment, which should allow us to decide things
such as what goes on which side of the API, etc. John
On Fri, Jun 14, 201
Christian,
You're preaching to the choir. I understand clearly.
John
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:46 PM, John Blossom wrote:
> > Christian,
> >
> > I leave it up to the developers to make those decisions. W
Michael, Joseph,
I am reading this part of the thread with great interest. It sounds as is
the OT paradigms that you and Joseph are suggesting might support different
types of formats for different messages/blips within a common
document/wavelet. That would seem to be an important objective,
poten
own
right, having at least a mirror of the code in that environment certainly
can't hurt.
All the best,
John Blossom
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, John Blossom wrote:
> > Github+Apache+Wave=awesomeness.
> >
&g
Github+Apache+Wave=awesomeness.
John
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Scott Wilson <
scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 12 Jun 2013, at 22:08, Upayavira wrote:
>
> > All I can say is, "well said". We need to consider Wave as a young
> > project - one that really doesn't yet have anyt
Agreed, Dave. Lots to do, but some agreement needed up front on where to
cut the overall architecture and how to phase it. Glad to help in that
process as required. John
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Dave wrote:
> On 12/06/13 23:08, Joseph Gentle wrote:
>
>> I don't think we should bully con
this thread. I hope
that this energy can be channeled towards maximum market impact. I don't
want Wave to be just great - I want it to rock the world, top to bottom.
All the best,
John Blossom
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Michael MacFadden <
michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
I agree, Joseph, just trying to give you a target to shoot at. I am here to
help you gain a market, and hopefully your decisions are market-worthy.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:08 PM
micro-optimizations and obfuscation which practically,
> manually can't be done
>
> 2) Except for Webworkers, everything in HTML5 can be used in GWT. I am
> using it, I am sure others are using them too. Even webworkers are usable,
> but its not as straightforward.
>
>
>
we have the core of a community that can help
us to move in that direction. I will weigh in on the "how" from time to
time, but overall I am most interested in the "x" - it's your solution.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
phone: 203.293.8511
google+: h
Looks like this was covered, sorry for the delay. I understand the
procedure, now.
Thanks,
John
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> please see below - changing the subject for better visibility.
>
> Cheers
> Christian
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
Not sure what needs to be done but let me know if I can help. J
On Jun 8, 2013 3:02 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> please see below - changing the subject for better visibility.
>
> Cheers
> Christian
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Upayavira
> Date: Sat, Jun
sounds like a very interesting bridge to keep the community both efficient
and in formed. Thanks!
John
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak) <
sten...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So I've been working on this for the past days. Still a work-in-progress,
> and will need at least an
t dozens of e-mails just because of logo stuff
> > and such, no matter how important the subject is. And yes, I can use
> > filters, but still they're not perfect and are PITA to maintain.
> >
> > PP
> >
> > On Jun 6, 2013, at 1:58 PM, "John Blossom - Sh
Good points all. I am content to continue the Wave:Forward level of
discussion in this venue, as long as we're focusing on the re-architecture
of the Wave platform it's very much a development focus. Perhaps another
list will make sense when there's more of a product management focus for
Wave - but
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
