Thomas, That's the key - if the coding model isn't right, the apps and the data model will never take off. We'll continue to see proprietary dead-end after dead-end.
All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Of what benefit would contributing this to wave be? > > Doesn't wave do a superset of this functionality already? (albeit with > messier code) > Seems (possibly) more useful for Wave to contribute its (federation) > functionality to this or a fork of it. Then you would have a new > pseudo-wave that does much of the same stuff, but with a much neater > codebase (and mobile support) to build from. > Alternatively if elements of this could replace waves code to > simplify/neaten it that might be good...but at least from an outsiders > perspective that seems rather hard. > > Regarding the point earlier about rich text in json - wouldn't it be easier > to use html encoding of styled text? To my knowledge html strings work in > json just fine as long as a few things are escaped. Or isnt this possible > with the OT method being used? > > > > > > ~~~ > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > > On 9 July 2014 17:06, 田传武 <i...@goodow.com> wrote: > > > inline > > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > What are your plans with it? > > > > > > > Not sure, may depend on the feedback. > > > > > > > Are you considering to contribute this to Wave? > > > > > > > I've read most of wave's code, but when I try to do big refactor, I am > > baffled. > > >
