I'm trying to compile Tightvnc 1.2.4 under AIX 4.3.3. Everything but
"Xvnc/programs/Xserver/hw/vnc" compiles.
The problem are lines in the Makefile of the form "MakefileTarget()".
AIX-make complains "line XXX: make: 1254-055 Dependency line needs colon
or double
For all who asked for it.
A replacement for the winvnc.exe from the latest tight.
Dlls and viewer are not changed.
./V1.2/tight-vdaccV1.2.exe
http://serivices.simac.be/vnc/winvncdrv
Vdacc driver and Tight-1.2.4.
Code was auto patched, but seems to run fine.
2 buttons added. (server prop)
+Ena
>>>>> "WO" == Will Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
WO> Is there a TightVNC 1.2.4 WindowsCE version availiable? Thanks !
No, I do not work on a version for WinCE, sorry...
--
With Best Wishes,
Constantin
--
Is there a TightVNC 1.2.4 WindowsCE version availiable?
Thanks !
William Olson, Princpal
Paragon Visual Solutions Inc.
810 East Indiana
Spokane, WA 99207
(509) 482-3465
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.paravis.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello,
I'm glad to announce the release of TightVNC 1.2.4. This version does
not include any major new features, its main focus is bug fixes.
Source and binary archives are available at the usual place:
http://www.tightvnc.com/download.html
Here is a brief list of changes as compared t
Thanks for the prompt reply.
I am aware of VNC's ability to remove the wallpaper altogether. My
question is about VNC *changing* the wallpaper.
I sign into my PC, via VNC. My standard wallpaper is displayed briefly
before VNC changes it to the wallpaper normally shown at the login
prompt. It onl
l ERP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Alex Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 6:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Wallpaper confusion with TightVNC / Windows 2000
I've tried searching the list archives and the FAQs, but haven't found
the
I've tried searching the list archives and the FAQs, but haven't found
the answer. I'd be grateful if someone points me in the right direction
if the answer is publicly available.
I regularly use TightVNC to control a PC running Windows 2000
Professional. This PC has been set to
Hi,
Thanks for the "perls" - cute ;-) - I guess I'll find out tomorrow if I
learned anything ;-)
Mick
At 11:30 PM 04/30/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>I have personally had both installed on the same machine and even run both
>clients at the same time.
>
>
>But what ever you do, don't install them b
cover additional stability and enjoy
the enhancements included with TightVNC, regardless of whether you are over
a slow or fast connection.
But what ever you do, don't install them both in the same directory.
This has been my humble perls of wisdom (a.k.a. opinion). Hop
Hi,
I've already installed VNC on a friend's machine to help me do remote
troubleshooting/maintenance for him. We're both on cable modems so the
speed is not bad, but I'd like to try TightVNC to see if there's any room
for improvement. The problem is he's ab
Thanks.
;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Simon
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:43 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: TightVNC
http://google.yahoo.com/bin/query?p=tightvnc&hc=0&hs=0
http://www.tightvnc.c
http://google.yahoo.com/bin/query?p=tightvnc&hc=0&hs=0
http://www.tightvnc.com/
-Original Message-
From: Brian J. Eckenrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TightVNC
Apologies for the question that I know has been
Apologies for the question that I know has been answered, but the archive
search on the web site is not functioning. So
I have seen many emails regarding TightVNC and I am wondering what exactly
it is.
Thanks,
Brian
-
To
Hi everybody
I have update an old set of patches that bring strong encryption to
VNC. The encryption is seemleassly built into VNC, without the need
for SSH tunnels etc.
Currently, I have them only for the Windows version of TightVNC 1.2.3
(server and client). And at the moment, I only provide
The Tier6 remote control console tool I released at SourceForge a few weeks ago
has just been updated - primarily for VNC.
The following changes have been made to it:
+ VNC connection now uses the TightVNC 1.2.3 Java Viewer
+ the ActiveX control version of the VNC viewer, which used pre-patch
I just did a "clean" install of VNC onto NT4, using the latest TightVNC. I'm
doing this to assemble documentation on what settings happen in the registry by
default and as a cross-check on the documentation at the VNC site.
I wanted to know if the default settings done by TightVNC
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wayne Throop)
:: For both tightVNC and VNCclassic, the server negotiates with each
:: viewer how encoding is done;
: Morrison Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: So, I've been trying to figure what are the best options to run with
: the viewer to get the best performan
So, I've been trying to figure what are the best options to run with the
viewer to get the best
performance. I have tightVNC server running on my Office machine, from what
you are saying no options at are are best, that the server will negotiate
the best options with the client?
Wayne T
and sometimes from a 28.8 kbps modem. Can I
: launch a single tightVNC session and connect to it in different ways
: from different places? That is, can the viewer tell the server how to
: encode the data for transmission?
Yes. You can tell the viewer to accept only faster encodings,
to ig
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Michael Milette wrote (quoting the tightVNC web site):
> Efficient compression algorithms. New Tight encoding is optimized for
> slow and medium-speed connections and thus generates much less traffic
> as compared to traditional VNC encodings. At the same time,
From the TightVNC web site ( http://www.tightvnc.com/ ):
=
TightVNC Features
Local cursor handling. Cursor movements do not generate screen updates any
more, remote cursor movements are processed locally by the viewer, so you
do not see remote cursor pointer moving too slow
il 05, 2002 4:57 PM
Subject: TightVNC
> I keep hering about TightVNC but what are the advantages vs disadvantages
to
> the regular VNC found on the AT&T site?
>
> -
> Joe O'Bremski,
I keep hering about TightVNC but what are the advantages vs disadvantages to
the regular VNC found on the AT&T site?
-
Joe O'Bremski, IT Manager
Carina Corporation
702-228-6376 x248
---
rsions to choose from for Solaris 8.
Don't know about tightvnc precompiled though.
Mike
-
To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line:
'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
-
Can't get this to compile on solaris8 seems to be a dependency on gcc
which I don't have
is there a site to get a precompiled version?
--
Thanks Morry
e-mail address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: X84792/650 786-4792 fax 650 562-2143
Hello,
>>>>> "RAL" == Robert A LaRock writes:
>>> TightVNC 1.2.3 has been finally released.
RAL> I have been testing TightVNC and, with one exception, it seems
RAL> good to me.
RAL> I am fond of the Win2VNC program by Fredrik Hubinette. If I use
Constantin
>> TightVNC 1.2.3 has been finally released.
I have been testing TightVNC and, with one exception, it seems good to me.
I am fond of the Win2VNC program by Fredrik Hubinette. If I use TightVNC,
closing the Win2VNC program crashes the TightVNC server. This happens if I
right
Agree!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TightVNC 1.2.3 released
The problem is the admins want to see what has hung, and because of this
they are switching to PC Anywhere which
mann
cc:
Sent by:Subject: Re: TightVNC 1
According to Constantin Kaplinsky:
> Hello,
>
> TightVNC 1.2.3 has been finally released.
[snip]
vncsnapshot (http://vncsnapshot.sourceforge.net) is based on TightVNC.
I used TightVNC 1.2.2 as the base. However, after inspecting the new version
(1.2.3) I have found that the portions of
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 2002-03-26 08:03
Subject: fyi 8255 PPI card [was Re: TightVNC 1.2.3 released]
> If you feel cheated that you end up with 16 leds hidden away inside each
PC where the sun doesn't shi
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: fyi 8255 PPI card [was Re: TightVNC 1.2.3 released]
>
>
> On 25/03/2002 20:18:50 Bryan Fields wrote:
> >
> > The way I fixed this, is to put a 8255 Peripheral
> co
On 25/03/2002 20:18:50 Bryan Fields wrote:
>
> The way I fixed this, is to put a 8255 Peripheral controller card in both
> computers, and wire one logic from each card to the other computers reset
> line. Then you can ssh/vnc into one and reboot it proper. If it hangs, then
> connect to the othe
I found that depending on whether I was behind a firewall,
I am accessing a cached copy of the TightVNC website.
It might help to browse to a different page, then clear
caches on disk and in memory. Sometimes, not even this
helps, presumably because some intermediate machines
insist on serving a
although he does not document it, there are a
couple of codes you can issue as arguments to rundll32 setupapi which might
be usable to do a direct command-line forced reboot.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, 2002-03-25 15:18
Subject: Re: TightVNC 1.2.3 released
> On Monday 25 March 2002 13:48, you wrote:
>
> > TightVNC is similar to VNC in this aspect. If somebody knows how to
> > solve the problem the most correct way, please let me know, I'll try
>
There was a good thread on this subject ("shutdown gotcha with Win32
host") about 3 weeks ago. Andrew van der Stock had a good description
of what the problem is and some suggestions for how it might be fixed.
Jake Hoover found this handy workaround:
http://www.winguides.com/registry/display.
On Monday 25 March 2002 13:48, you wrote:
> TightVNC is similar to VNC in this aspect. If somebody knows how to
> solve the problem the most correct way, please let me know, I'll try
> to fix that, if that would not take too much time.
This solution requites 2 computers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: TightVNC 1.2.3
released
e, and if something else hangs ,
tc> you will never know it. This is ok if the server is down the hall,
tc> but when it is across town or the country it really sucks.
TightVNC is similar to VNC in this aspect. If somebody knows how to
solve the problem the most correct way, please let me kno
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does tight VNC shut down before everything else like standard VNC? For
> those of you who don't know when you reboot a server with vnc, the vnc
> service is the first to die, and if something else hangs , you will
> never know it.
>
> This is ok if t
Does tight VNC shut down before everything else like standard VNC?
For those of you who don't know when you reboot a server with vnc, the vnc
service is the first to die, and if something else hangs , you will never
know it.
This is ok if the server is down the hall, but when it is across town or
>>>>> "DW" == Dave Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> TightVNC 1.2.3 has been finally released.
DW> I have a number of computers running regulat WinVNC. Can I simply
DW> stop the VNC service, kill winvnc.exe vncviewer.exe, drop in the
DW> new
You were at:
http://www.tightvnc.com/download.html
I assume.
It's there; I have noticed that SourceForge is somewhat slow this morning,
though.
- Original Message -
From: "Leite, Keith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, 2002-03-25 08:27
I just came from the tightvnc website and I cannot find the new
version 1.2.3 ???
Thanks Keith ...
-
To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line:
'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY
See
Constantin Kaplinsky wrote:
> TightVNC 1.2.3 has been finally released.
I have a number of computers running regulat WinVNC. Can I simply stop
the VNC service, kill winvnc.exe vncviewer.exe, drop in the new EXE and
DLLs (Into the existing \Program Files\ORL\VNC directory) and restart
Hello,
TightVNC 1.2.3 has been finally released. I'm sorry for the delay, but
it allowed me to fix more problems, including that zlib "double-free"
issue.
New version is available from the usual place:
http://www.tightvnc.com/download.html
Here is a brief list of cha
Hello Ivan,
>>>>> "IP" == Ivan Popov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
IP> Looking at TightVNC Unix Changelog at www.tightvnc.com, I don't
IP> see any changes since November 2001. I see also that most of the
IP> traffic on vnc-tight-list concerns Windows
ED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Constantin Kaplinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Patches for TightVNC and/or VNC
I wrote some time ago:
> >Unfortunately Constantin has no access to Sparc hardware and cannot verify
> >my patch or his own fix either, that may cause some extra delay.
DUH! You can't set a binary value from Poledit. And Jacob politely resisted
contradicting me...
- Original Message -
From: "Alex Angelopoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday/2002 March 05 16.07
Subject: Re: tightvnc vs "lo
>What OS would you need this for? I cobbeled a C++ app together and used
the
>VNC functions vncDecryptPasswd and vncEncryptPasswd. From this, I can view
>the password of a remote machine. I don't think this would be that big of
a
>problem, but I have to enumerate the HKEY_USERS registry key to
ey to find the
available users. I haven't done much testing, but it wouldn't take that
long.
Jake
-Original Message-
From: Alex Angelopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: tightvnc vs "loose" vnc
Th
That shouldn't be a problem. You still have to grab an encrypted value, but
you plug the pre-encrypted version into the policy template.
- Original Message -
From: "Jacob Hoover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday/2002 March 05 15.
policy editor.
Jake
-Original Message-
From: Alex Angelopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: tightvnc vs "loose" vnc
One of the annoyances of VNC is what it is.
The issue goes back to the fact that implemen
ROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday/2002 March 05 14.09
Subject: tightvnc vs "loose" vnc
: Hi,
:
: Our current plan is to deploy vnc server to our client 9x computers via a
: login.bat installation that will install, run registry files etc.
Currently
: it runs via the startup programs the f
r via the viewer or a web browser.
I just downloaded the tightvnc to test. Can anyone comment on the pro/con
of tightvnc in the scenario above or on how to change passwords on a regular
basis?
Thanks
Rusty
-
To unsubscribe, ma
I'm running TightVNC 1.2.2 on Windows 2000. It works fine but after a
disconnect the icons in Windows Explorer have a grey background to them.
It doesn't get "fixed" until I relogin to Windows 2000.
Anyone know what is causing this and how to resolve it? It's just a
Hello,
>>>>> "DD" == Dave Dyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I don't suppose you might consider using TightVNC instead of WinVNC
>> as your base code, would you? TightVNC is actively being developed,
>> has many more features, less bug
nefit
> of everyone...
>
> NB it doesn't uninstall 3.3.2 since the uninstall is
> different, but 3.3.3
> works fine. You'll have to change path to tightvnc etc. too
> but you should
> get the idea. I've used it on about 20 machines ok so far (with the
> exce
>I don't suppose you might consider using TightVNC instead of WinVNC as your
>base code, would you? TightVNC is actively being developed, has many more
>features, less bugs and is more stable than WinVNC.
I have made the "please incorporate this technology" overture
Hi Dave,
I don't suppose you might consider using TightVNC instead of WinVNC as your
base code, would you? TightVNC is actively being developed, has many more
features, less bugs and is more stable than WinVNC.
Alternatively, you might try offering Constantin the opportunity of
integr
I see a large difference, personally. I have a 768Kbps DSL line, but the
path between my home and the office is often congested, and the TightVNC
compression makes a noticable difference. The local cursor is also really
helpful -- it doesn't affect the functioning of the connection that
University, Mackenzie Building
1125 Colonel By Drive
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada K1S 5B6
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
>
> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 07:59:15 -0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Freddy Jensen)
> Subject: Re: TightVNC
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 07:59:15AM -0800, Freddy Jensen wrote:
>
> The reason I ask is that I purchased TridiaVNC (which is
> the productized version of TightVNC). I have run a few
> tests with it over my home DSL line, but it is difficult
> to see if there is any speed improvement
I think James posted once that he was working on his thesis and wouldn't
have a whole lot of time for VNC until he's done...
-Original Message-
From: Michael Milette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TightVNC
>From: "Fisher, Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Tue Feb 12 2002 7:15am
>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subj: RE: TightVNC 1.2.2, is it beneficial?
>
>I use just TightVNC. It comes with Default
I use just TightVNC. It comes with Default configurations for fast and slow
connections. I connect without compression at work, I connect with
compression from home.
-Original Message-
From: Alain LaBonti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 1:58 PM
To: '[
At 10:06 AM 2002-02-08, you wrote:
>>From: "Moreland, Julius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Fri Feb 8 2002 10:06am
>>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subj: TightVNC 1.2.2, is it beneficial?
>
K1S 5B6
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:07:49 +1100
> From: Chris Jaecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: TightVNC 1.2.2, is it beneficial?
>
> Fred,
>
> Just a quick clarification he
At 06:00 10/02/02 +, you wrote:
>Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 09:53:31 -0500
>From: Shing-Fat Fred Ma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: TightVNC 1.2.2, is it beneficial?
>
>I find tightVNC quite stable, and tight encoding is suppose to
>be more effective for pixels of great
I find tightVNC quite stable, and tight encoding is suppose to
be more effective for pixels of greater than 8 bits. But you would
probably only using tight encoding over 56Kbps lines (which
typically seem to operate at half that rate) because that's when
it actually improves bandwidth r
I think TightVNC is the best all-around version of VNC. I use it quite
a bit and haven't had any significant problems.
--
Mike Ossmann, Tarantella/UNIX Engineer/Instructor
Alternative Technology, Inc. http://www.alttec
>From: "Moreland, Julius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Fri Feb 8 2002 10:06am
>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subj: TightVNC 1.2.2, is it beneficial?
>
>I am considering deploying this to our clients in
I am considering deploying this to our clients in place of VNCr9.
Does anyone have an opinion on this version of Tight VNC?
Any raves or rants?
-
To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line:
'unsubscribe vnc-list' in th
If you want to use it with Win9x/ME over a slow modem connection, I highly
recommend TightVNC. Besides the compression, the latest release of TightVNC
includes a bug fix which eliminates the drain and potential crashing of the
VNC server during the initial transfer of the desktop image. After
Greetings,
Excuse what perhaps is a newbie question...
I have had Win32 TightVNC installed for some time connecting
from predominantly W2k Pro to other Pro workstations and 2k
Servers. I have one issue I have not been able to answer.
If I connect on a local lan, open notepad or dos edit
of them on XP.
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Stringham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday/2002 January 10 11:55
Subject: Re: TightVNC
: Isn't it true that XP has Java removed? Hence, it won't work?
:
: >>> [EMAIL PRO
]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven Stringham
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TightVNC
Isn't it true that XP has Java removed? Hence, it won't work?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08:
is still
compatible (althouhg you don't get the speed benefits). The only issue
I have seen is that I could not get my XP system to talk
Java to a TightVNC server, but that may have been due to
em to talk
Java to a TightVNC server, but that may have been due to something stuttering client
side, too.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Krug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday/2002 January 10 09:50
Subject: TightVNC
: Just curious i
I use it and have had no problems. It's faster over modem links, but over
high-speed ethernet links the Tight encoding tends to be slower than
Hextile. (You can switch it to Hextile coding, though, it doesn't always
have to use Tight.) It interoperates with the regular VNC viewer and
server, yo
Just curious if anyone has use this version of VNC? I am thinking about
using it but how does it compare in the realworld to regular VNC?
http://www.tightvnc.com/
Andrew Krug, MCP
IT Manager
Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
100 North Pitt Street
Suite 400
Alexandria, VA 22314
P:703.683.8416
F:70
>Hello,
>
>usually I am not reading the list, but I have noticed your question in the
>archive.
>
>There is an alignment bug in tightvnc (flipped due to the cursor support
>code), I have sent a workaround patch to the maintainer and presumably it
>will appear in the next r
I must've done something wrong - Xvnc gets a SIGBUS (alignment)
$c
rfbTranslateWithSingleTable8to32(290,9292aa,18d3ba,1990b0,18c1ba,3c9220) + 3c
rfbSendRectEncodingRaw(3c8ac0,18c000,18c110,480,384,0) + 244
rfbSendFramebufferUpdate(3c8ac0,1,18c158,0,0,480) + 890
rfbProcessClientNormalMessage(3c8ac0
>Well, since TightVNC is based on VNC code, it has to be GPL. What I was
>really asking is, are there any pitfalls in using Unix or Windows C code
>on a Mac? Also, are there any free compilers for the Mac?
Personally, I recommend working with Dair Grant and his VNCThing
viewer rather
See http://perso.wanadoo.fr/gilles.depeyrot/DevTools_en.html
Apple has provided compilers (free) for c/c++.
ScanMan wrote:
>
> Has anyone here looked into porting the TightVNC viewer to Macintosh? Is
> there anything that would keep you from just copying out the relevant
> parts of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 19 December 2001 9:58 pm, ScanMan wrote:
> Also, are there any free compilers for the Mac?
I doubt gcc/g++ will be on MacOS < 10, but of course on OS 10 there'll be
gcc/g++.
Dunno about any other compilers.
- --
Cheers, Chris Howells
Well, since TightVNC is based on VNC code, it has to be GPL. What I was
really asking is, are there any pitfalls in using Unix or Windows C code
on a Mac? Also, are there any free compilers for the Mac?
On Wed, 2001-12-19 at 12:42, Chris Howells wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 19 December 2001 6:33 pm, ScanMan wrote:
> Has anyone here looked into porting the TightVNC viewer to Macintosh? Is
> there anything that would keep you from just copying out the relevant
> parts of TightVNC for Windows/UNIX an
Has anyone here looked into porting the TightVNC viewer to Macintosh? Is
there anything that would keep you from just copying out the relevant
parts of TightVNC for Windows/UNIX and pasting them into the AT&T Mac
VNC viewer?
at even my gvim
startup script gets improperly interpretted when I
invoke the executable
from a different account from which it was built (gvim
gets choked by
starting a continued line with "\ ", which is suppose
to be how lines are
made to continue on.
The "make" for both
Hello,
> "S" == ScanMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
S> I have version 1.2.1 and the screen is just black when using the
S> Java viewer on a Mac. On other platforms, the Java viewer works
S> fine. Does 1.2.2 fix this problem?
The Java viewer in 1.2.2 is exactly the same as in 1.2.1.
--
Wi
ort 580x
> (where x is the vnc display #)
>
> the tightvnc distro has updated tightvnc java applet that will work fine.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ScanMan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 10:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Tigh
i've found that in that scenario, i just use the http version at port 580x
(where x is the vnc display #)
the tightvnc distro has updated tightvnc java applet that will work fine.
-Original Message-
From: ScanMan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 10:35
I am unfortunately forced to use a Macintosh. If there was a TightVNC compatible
viewer, the experience would be much more bearable.
-
To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line:
'unsubscribe vnc-list' in t
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:50:24PM +0700, Constantin Kaplinsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> TightVNC 1.2.2 has been released today. This version does not feature
> a lot of great new features, but I think improvements in its Win32
> part may worth the upgrade. Here is a brief list of chang
> "GN" == Gamlem, Noralf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GN> Since we're discussing passwords, I have another idea:
GN> 1. Support personell might need access to the computer even if the
GN>user is
GN> in front of it or not (enter a password and they're on)
GN> 2. "Other" people could be gran
for other people from the support staff
who are not aware of the temporary change.
Michael
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Breland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:25 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: IDEAS... RE
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:46 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: SV: IDEAS... RE: TightVNC 1.2.2 released
>
>
> Since we're discussing passwords, I have another idea:
>
> 1. Support personell might need access to th
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
