Hi Dave,
I don't suppose you might consider using TightVNC instead of WinVNC as your
base code, would you? TightVNC is actively being developed, has many more
features, less bugs and is more stable than WinVNC.
Alternatively, you might try offering Constantin the opportunity of
integrating your changes into TightVNC for you. I know he has been toying
with the idea of adding encryption to TightVNC and he might be interested
in implementing your changes. Can't hurt to ask.
Michael
At 01:52 AM 2002-02-26, you wrote:
> Since at&t is playing domain name games, ZNC is moving to a new home.
> Find it at:
>
> http://home.attbi.com/~davedyer/znc/zvnc.html
>
>The is no change (except from the location) from the version you may already
>be using.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line:
'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
