helps,
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeff Booth
Sent: 24 April 2002 03:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AUTHHOSTS Syntax
Does anyone know if a utility is out for logging the activity of VNC or
other remote programs?
Jeff
VNC has built-in logging; it sounds like you mean server-side, in which case you
want the loglevel and logmode settings on Windows systems...
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Booth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 2002-04-23 21:17
Subject
Does anyone know if a utility is out for logging the activity of VNC or
other remote programs?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line:
'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY
See also: http://www.uk.resear
OTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 2002-04-23 14:13
Subject: RE: AUTHHOSTS Syntax
> Tom:
> Heya. Quick suggestion: you have to restart your VNC
> server after you change the AuthHosts setting. It reads those
> settings on startup, *not* when a connection initiates. I
> believe that TightVNC
Tom:
Heya. Quick suggestion: you have to restart your VNC
server after you change the AuthHosts setting. It reads those
settings on startup, *not* when a connection initiates. I
believe that TightVNC is smarter than this, but I've not found
a way to force AT&T VNC to re-r
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: AUTHHOSTS Syntax
Tried it - not working. Is there a way to force the use of the accept
reject dialogue regardless of client source?
> -Original Message-
> From: Glenn Mabbutt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:07 AM
I have not been following this conversation all the way through, but here's some
info that may help.
(1) Note that the AuthHosts is a Local Machine-Specific Settinng - in other
words, it should go directly within
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\ORL\WinVNC3\
Note also that if you go to &
Tried it - not working. Is there a way to force the use of the accept
reject dialogue regardless of client source?
> -Original Message-
> From: Glenn Mabbutt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:07 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subj
5 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AUTHHOSTS Syntax
I'm having an issue, maybe there's someone out there who's dealt with
this before. We're trying to force the accept/reject dialogue box on
workstations but have 2 ranges of IP's. We need the user to be presented
with the ac
Those are local machine-specific settings also - same key as AuthHosts.
For reference:
http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/winvnc.html
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Papa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, 2002-03-14 09:29
Subject: Re
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 09:29:41AM -0500, Raymond Papa wrote:
> I put it in the wrong key. This worked:
>
> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ORL\WinVNC3]
> "AuthHosts"="-:+192.168"
> "DebugLevel"=dword:000a
> "DebugMode"=dword:0002
&g
I put it in the wrong key. This worked:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ORL\WinVNC3]
"AuthHosts"="-:+192.168"
"DebugLevel"=dword:000a
"DebugMode"=dword:0002
how about the DebugLevel & DebugMode.
I fully agree
- Original Message -
From: "Kutulu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: AuthHosts?
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 02:53:15PM +0100, Franck Chevalier wrote:
> > I think this lin
I tried that too and it doesn't work.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/14/02 08:53AM >>>
I think this line :
"AuthHosts"="-:+192.168:"
must be
"AuthHosts"="-:+192.168" (without : after 168)
- Original Message -
From: "Raym
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 02:53:15PM +0100, Franck Chevalier wrote:
> I think this line :
> "AuthHosts"="-:+192.168:"
> must be
> "AuthHosts"="-:+192.168" (without : after 168)
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Raymond Pa
I think this line :
"AuthHosts"="-:+192.168:"
must be
"AuthHosts"="-:+192.168" (without : after 168)
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Papa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 2:41 P
I can't get the AuthHosts to work. I want only the internal connection (those
in the 192.168.*.* range) to be able to connect.
I have the following in my registry:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ORL\WinVNC3\Default]
"SocketConnect"=dword:0001
"AutoPortSelect"=dwor
on the Internet.
To test this setup, I created an AuthHosts value in
HKLM\Software\ORL\WinVNC3 to read:
AuthHosts = -:+192.168.100.1:
But when my roommate tries to connect from his PC, it allows the connection.
The logging console window shows:
D:\ORL\vss\winvnc\vncServer.cpp : authhosts set to
he archive list where someone posted the same question and the solution seemed to be
use ZoneAlarm to restrict incoming connections. I would prefer to just configure VNC
if it would work.
I've left the "QuerySetting" at the default 2
Based on the documentation - I've adde
he archive list where someone posted the same question and the solution seemed to be
use ZoneAlarm to restrict incoming connections. I would prefer to just configure VNC
if it would work.
I've left the "QuerySetting" at the default 2
Based on the documentation - I've adde
> Hello,
> I am configuring access to VNC server with AuthHosts and null password so
> that I don't have to enter the password each time I connect to the server.
>
> AuthHosts is like "-:10.10.0.1:"
>
> When I connect to the VNC server with the VNC viewer
Try this..
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\ORL\WinVNC3\
AuthHosts is a string with value -:+ipaddr:
Note the - and then : before the + / allow entry followed by :.
Graeme Wright
Information Technology Officer
Desktop Services
Division of Information
Group,
I've read the manual and have messed around and can get it to deny based on
"-" addressing, but I want the server to deny everything except 1
address. So I have:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\ORL\WinVNC3\
AuthHosts +ipaddr
This should only give access to this
Hello,
I am configuring access to VNC server with AuthHosts and null password so
that I don't have to enter the password each time I connect to the server.
AuthHosts is like "-:10.10.0.1:"
When I connect to the VNC server with the VNC viewer, it works fine: I
connect without pas
Quick tip: Don't send binary attachments to email lists.
On Mon, 2001-12-17 at 17:31, Markus Sjvstrvm wrote:
> I've created a REG_SZ in the registry (under local machine)
> and then typed the whole ip adress I want to have access to my computer.
>
> this does not work..
> do I need to use any sym
I've created a REG_SZ in the registry (under local machine)
and then typed the whole ip adress I want to have access to my computer.
this does not work..
do I need to use any symbols? "+" "-" ":"?
Still everybody can access the computer (if they have the password of =
course)
please help..
I'm
ed on it, but no matter what it's set
to it shouldn't allow a connection through unchallenged that listed in the
deny column.
I actually read about the issues with AuthHosts and windows 95 in earlier
versions in the version history, but I tried everything except checking what
version
Do you have the "QuerySetting" key set in either/both??
-Original Message-
From: Robert Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VNC server and AuthHosts in Windows
I'm trying to configure WinVNC to block
Good morning,
I'm having trouble coming to terms with the registry settings used to allow
/ disallow IPs from connecting to a VNC Server.
Has anyone successfully used this command, and, if so, could you send me
examples of the settings you used, please ?
Thanks a lot in advance,
Bradley Yo
f the Windows 95 machine
REGEDIT4
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ORL\WinVNC3]
"AuthHosts"="-:+192.168.1.82:+192.168.1.58:"
and this is from the NT machine
REGEDIT4
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ORL\WinVNC3]
"AuthHosts"="-:+192.168.1.82:+192.168.1.58:"
I hav
Hello again.
According to the docs, an NT VNC server will bind to all available nics and there
seems to be
only two workarounds to this without recourse to a third-party app.
The first, using loopback redirection - doesn't suit my needs so I'm using the second,
which is
to set &quo
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Setting AuthHosts
Hello,
we're using TightVnc Version 1.2.0 with the setting
AuthHost -> -:?41.17 and
QueryTimeout -> 15.
Is a user logged on in the remote computer, is the connect to the computer
OK (disallow all address and display a pop-
Hello,
we're using TightVnc Version 1.2.0 with the setting
AuthHost -> -:?41.17 and
QueryTimeout -> 15.
Is a user logged on in the remote computer, is the connect to the computer
OK (disallow all address and display a pop-up from any connection other
than 41.17.x.x an wait 15 seco
Hello,
we're using TightVnc Version 1.2.0 with the setting
AuthHost -> -:?41.17 and
QueryTimeout -> 15.
Is a user logged on in the remote computer, is the connect to the computer
OK (disallow all address and display a pop-up from any connection other
than 41.17.x.x an wait 15 seco
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: AuthHosts QuerySetting to allow sessiom
Thanks I will try it.
Just one more thing. If the case of win95/98
machines, would I have to create an "administrator"
account for them?
And will the changes for the Administrator allow me to
access the machine even
gt; [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of Carlos Alfaro
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: AuthHosts QuerySetting to allow sessiom
>
>
> I know that TridiaVNC has a registry setting to
> allow
> the "?" ipchain in the AuthH
loged in use system.
Hope this helps
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Carlos Alfaro
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AuthHosts QuerySetting to allow sessiom
I know that TridiaVNC has a
I know that TridiaVNC has a registry setting to allow
the "?" ipchain in the AuthHosts registry key to allow
access to a machine if there is no response from the
user(in case the user is not there and there is a need
to control the machine)
VNC from AT&T does not have this setting
aluating the last bit
("-:10.8"). Which logically makes sense, as the last part of your first
attempt ("+:+10.8") isn't valid AuthHosts syntax (at least as I understand
it).
Of course I could be completely wrong ;)
Glenn
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Wyllie [mailto
Hi all,
I've just spent the last hour or 2 playing about with the AuthHosts setting.
The PC i'm working with has 2 network cards. One NIC is on one LAN, and
the other is on another LAN.
What i'm trying to do is allow PC's on the 1st LAN (10.8) to have access to
my PC. But a
: Advanced Settings - AuthHosts
try a string value of "-:+192.168.1." and stop and start WinVNC. The
AuthHosts logic being, "drop every connection, but accept those from
192.168.1.*".
-Original Message-
From: Tony Muckleroy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, Ju
try a string value of "-:+192.168.1." and stop and start WinVNC. The
AuthHosts logic being, "drop every connection, but accept those from
192.168.1.*".
-Original Message-
From: Tony Muckleroy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 3:12 AM
To: [EMAI
Can anyone give me an example, or point me to where I can see one?
I tried Authhosts with a string entry of +192.168.1 in the REG, but it didn't
make any difference.
-
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubs
Can anyone give me an example, or point me to where I can see one?
I tried Authhosts with a string entry of +192.168.1 in the REG, but it didn't
make any difference.
-
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubs
I think the format of the AuthHosts has changed from
eg
100.100.100.
to
100.100.100
the difference being the last full stop - by NOT entering the full stop -
everything works ok
I have not seen this written down - just by trial and error
cheers
-Original Message-
From: Ralph E
Regarding the AuthHosts entry in the registry, I found it by digging into
many of the old responses to the mailing list. When WinVNC is
installed under Windows, it creates a Key in the registry .. the
string value needs to be entered in the key.
Thank you for all who responded
I am sure there is an answer to my question, I just got up on the mailing
list for VNC. I am searching for the correct entries and syntax
to implement the AuthHosts to restrict select IP networks. I have attached
a screen shot of the registry key for VNC. Thank you
<>
[demime 0.97b r
> I'm trying to use the AuthHosts directive to limit the access to a
> computer. I want to do the following:
>
> 1. If a remote user is trying to connect from a subnetwork, by example
> 192.168.1.0, allow him to connect quietly.
> 2. If a remote user is trying to conn
l-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Manuel Martmnez
Valls
Enviado el: jueves 31 de mayo de 2001 19:09
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: AuthHosts
Hi,
I'm trying to use the AuthHosts directive to limit the access to a
computer. I want to do the following:
Hi,
I'm trying to use the AuthHosts directive to limit the access to a
computer. I want to do the following:
1. If a remote user is trying to connect from a subnetwork, by example
192.168.1.0, allow him to connect quietly.
2. If a remote user is trying to connect
Hi,
I'm trying to use the AuthHosts directive to limit the access to a
computer. I want to do the following:
1. If a remote user is trying to connect from a subnetwork, by example
192.168.1.0, allow him to connect quietly.
2. If a remote user is trying to connect
ridge - Tel : 766513
AT&T Labs Cambridge, UK - Tel : 343000
- Original Message -
From: "Olivier LUTHIER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 12:56 PM
Subject: "AuthHosts" value....arg
> H
HY,
I'v read the documentation about "AuthHosts", but i can't find how to make
"accept" by defaut with question ?
Because, if nobody is here to answer the question i'll can not connect to
make my work...
-
Yop, in french,
J'ai bien lu la doc pour les paramhtres de "AuthHosts" mais je ne pense pas
riussir ` "jouer" avec les 4 niveaux de sicuriti de "querrysetting".
Car en fait je cherche ` "accept" la connection par difaut aprhs le
"timeout&quo
At 10:03 AM 5/25/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Here's my situation - I've thought of using TZO on the client side to use
>with the AuthHosts setting on the server (which doesn't look like it can be
>done after further research - and with the addition of the possibility of
>spo
Here's my situation - I've thought of using TZO on the client side to use
with the AuthHosts setting on the server (which doesn't look like it can be
done after further research - and with the addition of the possibility of
spoofing, as you mentioned, it isn't looking too a
At 09:18 AM 5/25/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Is it possible to successfully use a domain name (my.domain.com) _instead
>of_ ip addresses in the AuthHosts registry entry? TIA
Probably not. AuthHosts is a security measure, and DNS lookups are easily
spoofed. IP addresses are harder to fake and
Is it possible to successfully use a domain name (my.domain.com) _instead
of_ ip addresses in the AuthHosts registry entry? TIA
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.255 / Virus Database: 128 - Release Date: 5/17/2001
I think you should use -:+62.254.164.38 (i.e. remove two colons) and put the
value in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/Software/ORL/WinVNC3.
Angus.
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Cotter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 4:20 PM
Subje
I am using WinVnc Version 3.3.3 R9 on Windows 98. I am having a problem
using the AuthHosts Property. I want to only allow connections from one IP
(62.254.164.38) so I added a String Value into
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/Software/ORL/WinVNC3/Default which contains
-:+:62.254.164.38:
This does not appear
I think you want -:+10.35.1
This denies access to everyone, except those matching 10.35.1
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalo Palma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 3:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How AuthHosts works?
Hello,
In Win nt 4.0 SP 5
Hello,
In Win nt 4.0 SP 5 winvnc 3.3.3r9...
AuthHosts :-10.35.1:
is not working
What Can I do?
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Sharma, Shashi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 2:37 PM
Subject: RE: Single w
my question is now that I have it set,
how can I toggle between that and the default.
I have a need to be able to hook up to a client,
when a user is not logged in.
Ralph Wagner
BSS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I don't get to configure AuthHosts. Who knows,
try this:
example
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ORL\WinVNC3]
"AuthHosts"="-:?10:?32"
"QueryTimeout"=dword:003c
"ConnectPriority"=dword:0001
"QuerySetting"=dword:0002
?10:?32 I have set 10 and 32 to ?192.168.x.x:?192.168.x.x
for
Hello,
I don't get to configure AuthHosts. Who knows, please to inform format to accept
only connection of two IPs. tks, Arthur
[EMAIL PROTECTED] em 06/04/2001 14:02:19
Favor responder a [EMAIL PROT
Has the format of the Authhosts changed from r7
I am trying to exclude everyone EXCEPT certain subnets
and the AuthHosts string looks like
-:+a.b.c.:+g.h.i.:
I have read/reread the manual, this seems to conform but rejects the subnets
!!
any thoughts
regards and thanks
Martin
I've verified that this is a problem with release R8 and "match all"
AuthHosts strings, such as "+", "-" or "?".
I'm preparing a release R9 to fix this!
Cheers,
James "Wez" Weatherall
--
"The path to enlightenment is
--On Thursday, March 15, 2001 7:49 PM + Tristan Richardson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AT&T Laboratories Cambridge is pleased to announce release 3.3.3r8
It appears that this release ignores the AuthHosts setting completely.
I have the following registry entries (on Window
> The installation section of the VNC guide refers to an advanced setting
> for
> AuthHosts. This setting is suppose to be in the
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINES\Software\ORL\WINVNC3\ registry branch.
>
> I am unable to find AuthHosts anywhere in the Registry.
If it does not exist, cre
The installation section of the VNC guide refers to an advanced setting for
AuthHosts. This setting is suppose to be in the
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINES\Software\ORL\WINVNC3\ registry branch.
I am unable to find AuthHosts anywhere in the Registry.
I'm running vnc v3.3.3r7 on a nt4.0 box with SP6a
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 12:24:48AM -0500, Jerry Coker wrote:
> Does WinVNC pass the pw in the clear!? The authentication method used
> by WinVNC client/server is fuzzy to me after reading
> http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/sshvnc.html. I get the impression that
> the pw may be passed as plain
Thanks for the replies re: my previous post on how to create the
AuthHosts key using regedit. It was easy enough to do (after reviewing
the urls some of you posted), and AuthHosts is working for me now.
However, being new to VNC, I have one important question:
Does WinVNC pass the pw in the
>Just installed WinVNC server on a Win98SE pc. This is my first
>experience with VNC. It is cool. However, I want to implement the
>AuthHosts settings to restrict access as I test/learn this cool app., and
>I have a rather lame question. I understand the sytax for restricting
>
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2001 4:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WinVNC v3.3.3R7 & AuthHosts/REG_SZ string
Just installed WinVNC server on a Win98SE pc. This is my first
experience with VNC. It is cool. However, I want to implement the
AuthHosts settings to restrict access as I t
Just installed WinVNC server on a Win98SE pc. This is my first
experience with VNC. It is cool. However, I want to implement the
AuthHosts settings to restrict access as I test/learn this cool app., and
I have a rather lame question. I understand the sytax for restricting
access via the
in
kix).
-Original Message-
From: James ''Wez'' Weatherall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 10:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: winvnc AuthHosts
> was playing with this, testing to see how well I could use it to allow and
> den
w to change it. I do
not
> have the ability to test to see if this behaves the same way for subnets
> (will -192.168.1 block 192.168.1, 192.168.10, and 192.168.100 ?)
Oh dear. It seems I'm a clueless muppet.
Yes, the code simply treates the AuthHosts "sections" as a rudimentary
was playing with this, testing to see how well I could use it to allow and
deny hosts. I noticed that it did not behave in the way I anticipated.
Obviously the firewall is the best place to do this to block external hosts.
It seems that a pattern of -192.168.9.1 will block 192.168.9.1,
192.168.9.1
78 matches
Mail list logo
