let me amend that. it doesn't work when i load winvnc manually as a limited
user. i can connect, from the w2000 machine, but i only see a black screen...
- Original Message -
From: "David Rothman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursda
i'm still not clear why this isn't working for me.
i installed xp-home on a machine which i previously used 98 & vnc on.
there are 5 users on the xp machine. i installed vnc as the administrator and
it 'works' (meaning i can load & see that machine remotely from a w2000
machine). it doesn't l
i've drawn a blank and i didn't find the answer in a
search...
simply, i cannot recall the syntax to connect using vnc via
Internet explorer (which i used to be able to do). i have
no problems using vncviewer (w2000 machine to w2000
machine), but, my attempts to use IE have failed because i
beli
hi...thanks for the reply (i've been away so i'm just
catching up)...
i'd be interested in the workaround u mentioned. can u
provide any links or add'l info? thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Miroslav Luptak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 6:04
hi...thanks for the reply (i've been away so i'm just
catching up)...
i'd be interested in the workaround u mentioned. can u
provide any links or add'l info? thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Miroslav Luptak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 6:04
on my home lan i can use vpn to go from my main machine
(win 2000 pro) to a win98 machine.
on that win98 i can run cisco vpn 2000 client window to
attach to a corporate vpn.
i'd like to access the vpn remotely by attaching to the win
98 machine via vnc and then run the cisco client. problem
is
how well do u think cut and paste will work for a 1,2 or 10
gb file?
why bother continuing with the cut and paste idea when u can
simply email smaller files? and for slightly larger than
small files, u can (with a utility) split the file and email
the pieces. this is surely simpler than uuencod
01 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: file xfer
> : David Rothman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> : my thinking is that since there isn't (at least no one
in multiple
> : forums or newsgroups has truly answered the question) a
simple
> : standalone utility to effectuate simple, secure 2 way
file
&
as for a-ftp, i'll direct u to:
http://www.securiteam.com/exploits/SoftHead_A-FTP_vulnerable
_to_DoS_attack.html
as well as:
http://www.bookcase.com/library/software/msdos.network.undef
.html
which slams the program w/o any supporting documentation
- Original Message -
From: "Steven V
well
as with all ftp recs, does anyone have a clue about the
security issues with this one? meaning for all the reasons
people say 'don't use ftp' why should we use this one?
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Vallarian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTE
- Original Message -
From: "Mac Reiter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: FTP SOLUTION!
> At 11:04 AM 3/14/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >mac, as one who keeps arguing for a solution to the file
> >xfer problem, i don't believe net
sition is so distracting. I get hypnotized waiting for
the remote cursor
> to catch up with the local one and forget what I am doing.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Rothman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 11:00 AM
> > T
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Morton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: file xfer
> >there so many posts on this subject yesterday, this one
was
> >either lost in the shuffle or most likely ignored. i
still
> >think
mac, as one who keeps arguing for a solution to the file
xfer problem, i don't believe netmeeting offers a decent
solution. i believe it is using IRC to do the file xfer and
if so it is infinitely easier to just set aol IM or yahoo
messenger or even icq.
if it doesn't use IRC, then even with the
well, that's fine for simple text, or i guess if u wanted to
use uuencode or even hex...but really that's hardly a robust
solution. i mean, sure it can be done, but i'd think it
would be easier to just split the file using a simple
utility and email the pieces.
my question was meant for large fo
there so many posts on this subject yesterday, this one was
either lost in the shuffle or most likely ignored. i still
think it has merit, so please pardon the reposting. i've
edited out most of the verbiage and just left the question.
but what about on the fly file xfers?
1. i sometimes hav
re: your bottom line...
> To put it like this, if you can get your users to embrace
VNC, and they know
> enough about computers to use it, they sure as hell know
enough to use an
> ftp program, and seriously I've seen FTP servers that are
a lot less
> complicated to configure than VNC (basically
AIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: but exactly which part of ftp is possibly
unsafe?
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:13:54AM -0500, David Rothman
wrote:
>
> > Posed simply, many claim that ftp is 'unsafe', but where
is
> > the risk?
>
&
with all this current ftp discussion and my thread on ftp
from a few weeks ago, i will bring up this question again:
Posed simply, many claim that ftp is 'unsafe', but where is
the risk? from what i understand, ftp doesn't have any
built in encryption, so to the extent that a file can be
interce
in windows i've never been able to execute the shortcut key
of an icon on the remote machine.
IOW, if im on the VNC screen i'd like the Ctrl-Alt-whatever
to be seen by the remote machine.
is there a way to do this? thanks
-
To
"Building a better idiot through
automation"
> IT - Engineering Services
> Desk: (512) 741-1356 - Cell (512) 970-6748
>
> Visit www.Vignette.com to learn more.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Rothman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001
is there a reason people would chose to use a browser
instead of the vnc viewer?
- Original Message -
From: "Philippe Payant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 10:59 AM
Subject: Password problem when nobody logged on
> I am running W2K and wh
- Original Message -
From: "ronnie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: Virgin ?
> David and Thomas thanks for your replies.
> I am new to networking and the idea of controlling pc's
remotely. I can
> connect fine between th
i originally had trouble getting vnc to connect two pc's
over the net - both machines behind rt311 routers. the
solution was a small twiddle in zone alarm's settings.
fyi, i've never been able to get VNC to work thru the
browser. ive always used the viewer.
in menu 15 all u need do is assign 5
first, thanks very much for the detailed response.
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph A. Knapka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: mapping a remote drive
> David Rothman wrote:
> >
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph A. Knapka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: mapping a remote drive
> David Rothman wrote:
> >
> > is SSH with win 2000 really a practical solut
re fairly hard coded,
but they can be
> moved to'non-standard' ports. FTP would probably be the
hardest as it would
> take some playing on the client end. HTTP is easy to
'move' on the client
> end for special machine.
>
> But the suggestion for SSH makes th
re what u mean by
'moving' HTTP on the client end. can u plse explain?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Rothman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 6:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mapping a remote drive
>
>
>
ots more attempts against port 138 than VNC.
>
> Lyle
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Rothman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 2:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mapping a remote drive
>
>
> yes..clearly it means openin
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 3:27 PM
Subject: RE: mapping a remote drive
> That means opening up netbios to the world(port 138). NOT
a smart idea.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Rothman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: F
with vnc, when you want to talk to machine(x) which is
behind a router, the router needs to be set to forward port
590x to machine(x).
presumably this is also true with mapping a drive (using win
2000 pro)
on a machine behind a router, but the syntax is not obvious
to
me. i would think it's an a
um...i don't quite see what you're saying
- Original Message -
From: "Johannes Herlitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 5:46 AM
Subject: Re: VNC thru browser
> > im running w2000 pro and IE 5.5 and use vnc w/o any problems other
than
im running w2000 pro and IE 5.5 and use vnc w/o any problems other than
i cannot view another (local) machine thru the browser. is there some
special setting i need to enable or something i should investigate?
thanks
-
To unsubsc
poke
> that to the dynamic DNS server where you'll have a DNS name, like
> rothman.dyndns.net
>
> Here's a good link to get you started.
>
> http://noeld.com/download.htm#DynSite
> http://noeld.com/download.htm#Supported
>
> Hal Rottenberg | Hewlett-
> well the only way I have been able to allow other computers access to
a
> computer running the free zonealarm is to add them (IP address) to
local
> zone. then the settings for local zone are used rather than the
internet
> zone.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Davi
i've tried several searches of vnc and router and zonealarmnothing
especially useful came up
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: vnc in w2000 behind router and zonealarm
> While you're wai
im sure this has been discussed to death, but i havent found an explicit
reference in a quick scan...
i want to access my machines remotely over the net. they all run w2000
or w98se. they all use a netgear rt311 router to share a cable modem
and they all run zonealarm.
i know that i have to op
37 matches
Mail list logo
