Hi there,
when running a 'sudo apt-get install spamassassin' on my raspian pi 3b+
i keep running into a problem with sa-compile:
sa-compile (3.4.2-1+deb10u3) wird eingerichtet ...
Running sa-compile (may take a long time)
In file included from
/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/perl
Ok so it seems I cant do anything to get it running on my side.
Funny enough that I use the official raspian which I kept up to date
with 'sudo apt-get update'
and now the 'sudo apt-get install that claims to use the newest version
(3.4.2-1+deb10u3) keeps running into such an error.
How to find
spamassassin
Without any further params. How am I supposed to know where that command
does get its package from???
Christian
Greetings,
I'm using the KAM ruleset and have noticed that, even though I don't
have the KAMOnly plugin installed, the KAMONLY encapsulated rules are
still getting fired. In particular the rescored rules. How can I disable
this feature?
Thanks in advance!
Nedry
Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail> - 703.798.0171
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 9:31 PM <mailto:spamassas...@bluestreak.net>> wrote:
Greetings,
I'm using the KAM rule
at rule is from 25_uribl.cf <http://25_uribl.cf>
Regards,
KAM
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail> - 703.798.0171
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:4
scores to 0.01 to avoid false rejections). Is this code
known to fail or is it something I'm doing wrong?
Spamassassin version: 3.3.2
Perl version: 5.14.2
OS: Linux Mint 13
=
The section header for the code runs...
"penalize mail claiming to be from PayPal, eBay, Yahoo or Gma
And a convenient spam purporting to come from google verifies the second
part of the test. Thanks again. :)
--
Dave Stiles
Bill, thanks for your input.
As far as I am aware the versions are the latest for my OS - Mint Maya
13 is essentially Ubuntu 12.04 - but I will check. In any case I'm due
to update the OS in the near future.
My MTA is postfix but I find it easier to manage rules in SA than in
postfix, which
Bill, thanks for your input.
As far as I know those apps are current for my OS, which is essentially
Ubuntu 12.04 (due to be updated soon).
My MTA is postfix but I generally reject or discard through that,
whereas SA delivers most stuff to the junk bin as a final check by me.
I was unaware
Hi. I'm getting T_SPF_PERMERROR extremely often. Not exclusively, but
especially when spammers are faking my own domain names.
Here's an example from the good old xerox copier spam:
From cop...@nro.ca Fri May 26 08:26:18 2017
Return-Path:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (
Thanks for the tip! I didn't know how to debug that stuff. Here's what
happens with a spammer faking one of my own domains:
>spamd[21654]: spf: query for
>isabelle.2...@nro.ca/41.203.191.125/!41.203.191.125!: result: permerror,
>comment: , text: Included domain 'srs.bis.na.blackberry.com' has no
Mail::SPF version 2.009 is package "Mail-SPF-v2.9.0" which is what I
indicated I was using (and had to force install) in my first post.
spfquery works, but whatever perl interface SA is using is not producing
correct results. Not just on my own domains, but on many others as well. My
dns spf reco
registered).
I am having good success using Mail::SPF::Query with spamassassin
The spfquery tool also appears to work.
This bug report from 2014 reflects my experience.
Bug #99890 for Mail-SPF: Mail-SPF-v2.9.0 fails Build test
https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=99890
My guess for the ca
For some reason, spamassassin thinks that 0/0 is trusted, even after my
most strenuous attempts to dissuade it:
$ grep _networks /etc/spamassassin/*
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf:# trusted_networks 212.17.35.
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf:clear_trusted_networks
/etc/spamassassin
> Probably hit by a bug in NetAddr::IP, see:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6681
>
> Upgrade it to NetAddr-IP-4.055 or downgrade to 4.048.
Bingo! I upgraded to 4.056 and no more problem!
Apparently there'a a workaround, too, mentioned
On 23/11/11 17:55, Christian Grunfeld wrote:
> What do I mean? you never never answer (or it is really strange) a
> spam message.
On my personal email system, my MSA records Message-Id's of outgoing
mail into a database. If a message comes in to my MTA with one of those
Message-Id's in the "In-Re
On 24/11/11 13:18, Lucio Chiappetti wrote:
>> If a message comes in to my MTA with one of those Message-Id's in the
>> "In-Reply-To" header, it bypasses the spam filtering because it is a
>> response to a message that I sent
>
> what about if your message was stored in a folder of your correspo
On 30/11/11 07:17, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>>> I've attached version 2.0 with this email (it's the clean version without
>>> all the comments :) ). I've pretty much finished up the definitions and
>>> some cleaning up. Again, I would really enjoy feedba
On 23/12/11 11:29, Henrik K wrote:
>> Performance with the database on physical disks simply wasn't
>> keeping up with more than about double the average message rate (if
>> that...), so I fell back to the "good enough" setup of putting the
>> SA database on a RAMdisk,
> I guess it still boils do
ly random, so there's nothing to cache. Any write to the
> table will invalidate caches anyway. And those writes happen every time a
> token is read (atime is updated).
To stop the query cache being invalidated, it would probably be better
if the writes were queued and then done in batches. C
On 23/12/11 14:25, David F. Skoll wrote:
> The only downside to CDB is that incremental updates are not possible.
> To train, you need to rebuild the entire CDB file. For us, that's
> an acceptable tradeoff, but YMMV.
Another major downside to this approach compared to using MySQL, is that
it do
On 23/01/12 12:22, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
> Resolving the block might be as simple as using your own caching
> nameserver to avoid being lumped together with other users queries;
> setting up your own mirror of the DNS-blocklist; or paying to use the
> blocklist. The choice is up to the DNS-Blocklist
Hi guys,
I am working on a plugin to check X-PHP-Script and am wondering if
there is a way to add the IP to the DNSBL check list?
Regards,
Lawrence
On 12.06.2014 22:14, spamassas...@lcwsoft.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I am working on a plugin to check X-PHP-Script and am wondering if
there is a way to add the IP to the DNSBL check list?
Regards,
Lawrence
I'm guessing nobody knows the answer
On 13.06.2014 19:47, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 6/13/2014 6:15 PM, spamassas...@lcwsoft.com wrote:
On 12.06.2014 22:14, spamassas...@lcwsoft.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I am working on a plugin to check X-PHP-Script and am wondering if
there is a way to add the IP to the DNSBL check list?
Regards,
La
sian matching out of this in spamassassin, so I'm concluding it
is a real issue and not just aesthetic. Sample output (mind you after loading
only ONE 32-line/304-word spam message).
(actual output 166 lines long. truncated...):
# sa-learn --dbpath /tmp/bayes-testing/ --dump
0.000
soft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.
From: "Dr. Loyd Shafer " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ...
Subject: Huge Selection 3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 8.2-spambr_6119620U on tradeexperts.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no
v
>tools/check_whitelist. How could this have happened:
>
> 1) I don't see the AWL being generated by YOUR version of SA.. I see it
> being generated by someone who is using a DIFFERENT version of SA...
>
> > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 8.2-spambr_6119620
I think it was Michael Parker (thanks) that gave me the tip that SA might not
be reading my headers right. I followed up on that and confirmed. I'm getting
the above debug message when I run a test on a specific single spam that made
it through. Here is my whole debug line showing the header
No typo.. there is indeed no space between the close-paren and "by."
Additionally, looking at some upstream headers on some of this spam I see the
same thing from other mailers:
Received: from p508d7ae3.dip.t-dialin.net (p508D7AE3.dip.t-dialin.net
[80.141.122.227])by myhost.mydomain.com (8.13.
List:
I was wondering if SpamAssassin could be used to
filter HTML emails and force execution of an external program to convert html to
text.
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0.1 with
amavisd-new
Thanks in advance,
*Ronald Vi
hi all,
i guess i have a very odd but hopfeully easy question.. i searched the web
and the newsgroups as good as i could.. but may i use the wrong
searchwords then i beleive the answer is already somewhere.
i'm using sa 3.0 by injecting the mails via procmail to spamc.. the
configuration is store
I'm interested in using SpamAssassin and would like to know if anyone has
used it for
outbound filtering.
For example:
I would like the ability to filter messages by domain. To prevent being
blacklisted by
AOL or such companies, I would like to filter outbound email destined to
AOL for
I am running SpamAssassin version 3.1.7 with Postfix via amavisd on a
FreeBSD machine.
In the last few weeks, all of a sudden messages with the same 4 or 5
subject lines started coming through undetected for some reason.
So I decided to add patterns matching those to
/usr/local/share
/local/share/spamassassin/60_whitelist_subject.cf
Silly question: are you sure that your WhiteListSubject plugin is even
working in the first place?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
key
us.pm". Here's an example of where it might be:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm
Around line 967, change this:
$new_hdrs_pre .= "X-Spam-$header: $line\n";
to this:
$new_hdrs_post .= "X-Spam-$header: $line\n";
That's it.
-Sean
We have users who's mail is sent through a proxy server before it gets
filtered through SpamAssassin.
The proxy server rewrites the header of the message and then sends it
on. When our SpamAssassin
server filters the message it reads it as a forged outlook header and
assigns it 3 p
I'm new to the list but have been running SA for some time
I am using spamassassin-3.0.4-1.fc3
with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms
+ autowhitelist
No Razor
No Pyzor
No Bayes
on a test system to evaluate SA.
I had been running successfully (only a few spam emails getting through
until shortly
Hi
I've found FP 70_sare_spoof.cf triggering with SARE_FORGED_CITI
In the rule
header __RCVD_CITIBNK Received =~
/(?:citi(?:bank|cards|corp|bankcards)|acxiom|c2it)\.com/i
header __FROM_CITIBNK From =~ /citi(?:bank)?\.com/i
uri __URI_CITIBNK /citi(?:bank)?\.c
At 10:07 AM 3/9/2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Are you getting spam from hotmail/yahoo addresses?
All the time.
I have user mail being sent from my domain to my domain flagging as
spam. that's ok really. It's what's making it flag as spam that's
bugging me - SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=4.659 tagged_above=-999 required=4.3
tests=[DYN_RDNS_SHORT_HELO_HTML=0.287, HTML_FONT_SIZE_LARGE=0.001,
Interesting, but, the domain I'm asking about isn't sinister.net :-)
My current guess is that when the mail processes into amavis, when
send from local <> local (all on the same server) the email comes
from localhost, triggers SA, localhost isn't in the SPF record, and
thus triggers the SPF_N
Is it possible to get spamassassin to score email addresses with 4
(or more) numeric digits in sequence in the user name?
(seems like a lot of our spam comes in for garbage users with user
names that are strings of numbers).
Thanks!
rick
Rick Steeves
http://www.sinister.net
&quo
At 11:19 AM 3/26/2009, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, spamassas...@corwyn.net wrote:
(seems like a lot of our spam comes in for garbage users with user
names that are strings of numbers).
...your MTA should _not_ be accepting invalid recipient addresses
for delivery. Fix your MTA con
If anyone has an example config for sendmail to use the backscatter rbl at
smtp time please send it. I take a beating from backscatterers.
I would think you could do this with a macro that checks "mail from" and
triggers an rbl check on the ip. Sounds simple but my cf skills are barely
above trial
I am running spamassassin with postfix via amavisd on a FreeBSD Intel box.
Email from Nintendo's Wii service is getting flagged as spam, despite me
entering it into the whitelist. This seems to be the case with other
unrelated entries that I have whitelisted as well.
I have entere
ad.jp
def_whitelist_auth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whitelist_auth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dont use both since its 2 diff scores, and only use the one that are needed
here is the spf
http://old.openspf.org/wizard.html?mydomain=wii.com&submit=Go%21
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::S
Good afternoon, I am running into an issue with spamassassin. According
to the logs I am being denied permissions to the root homedirectory
bayes: cannot open bayes databases /root/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie
failed: Permission denied
Dec 16 14:31:47 tracyrh02 spamd[8124]: spamd: processing
, December 16, 2006 2:46 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: starting spamd
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 02:37:35PM -0700, spamassassin wrote:
> bayes: cannot open bayes databases /root/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O:
tie
> failed: Permission denied
>
> spamd --helper-home-dir
@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: starting spamd
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 02:50:58PM -0700, spamassassin wrote:
> Thanks for the response. I would not mind running spamd as root, but
I
> get the same error and the documentation have found that is when it
> tries to run as root it runs as nobod
Thanks for all your help. I was using version 2 of spamass-milter so I
upgraded to the latest version 3.1 and now I get this error
Milter (spamassassin): error connecting to filter: Connection refused by
/var/run/spamass.sock
And then spamassassin stops. Everything looks ok permissions wise
Hello
I'm new to spamassassin and need some help.
First spamassassin is version 3.0.1 on mac OSX 10.3.9 running on a
communigate server. I have an interface that we use call MPP which is
basically a webmin module to control spamassassin, clamav, mailshell,
and such. I have been ge
Hello list:
This is the challenge I face. I would like to be able to filter emails
based on MySQL-stored preferences. For each email coming in, I would like
SpamAssassin to check the database for $WHITELISTED or $BLACKLISTED email
addresses and tag the email as ${UNSEEN} if it is a newly seen
Does anyone have written a custom rule to catch this spam?
It would of great help.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Carmella Boehm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 6:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Account Info
Friendly Reminder; Get your desired product
Hi,
I searched the list and found this rule to catch URL with single space
(www.ledrx .com). Please help me in modifying this rule to catch URL with
double space (www.superveils . com).
body URL_WITH_SPACE m/\bhttp:\/\/[a-z0-9\-.]+[!*%&, -]+\.?com\b/
Thanks.
-Original message-
From: D
d to allocate per user!
That would be pretty hard to predict as it would vary a lot based on the
users and the mail.
I don't think Bayes is really that big (a few MB max?)
It's not big. Here's my personal spamassassin database (just a few
users, but SA has been running for years and
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expire atime delta
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expire
reduction count
I've had good luck with using mariadb and galera to share the
spamassassin database across systems. I run a small 3-node setup for
email, 2x servers running dovecot replicating to each
On 2022-05-06 6:56 am, Henrik K wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 12:31:47PM +0200, giovanni@paclan.itwrote:
> On 5/6/22 11:08, Niels Kobschätzki wrote: Hi, I have a setup where the
> spamassassin-servers have actually no access to the data of the mail-servers.
> Now I was
Hi,
I use spamc -C report to report spam mails. I only want to report them
to Pyzor. How do I disable reporting the mails to Razor (which fails
anyways as I'm not registered)?
Also as I see it using spamc -C report also marks the mail as spam in
the bayes database, is this correct? There is no do
an a milter, you could
just deliver mail directly from amavis to the zimbra mailbox server [bypassing
the zimbra mta which you don't need in term of this] via lmtp [typically port
7025], and it would just work. none of the attempting to trick one instance of
spamassassin with anot
> On Dec 19, 2015, at 04.35, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 19.12.2015 um 04:08 schrieb listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net:
>> On Dec 17, 2015, at 13.16, Alfredo Saldanha
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> My second SA is a Zimbra server.
>>> I use Zimbra SA only to drop the message in junk folder.
>>> I don'
Hello,
Every incoming mail with valid DKIM-signatures is tagged with
T_DKIM_INVALID.
But when I run such a mail through spamassassin -t -D dkim < email it
finds no errors?
I already googled this but it always comes down to missing packages that
are being reported with the debug, but in my c
On 06/24/2016 07:53 PM, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:20:35 +0200
> G.H. (Spamassassin) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Every incoming mail with valid DKIM-signatures is tagged with
>> T_DKIM_INVALID.
>> But when I run such a mail through spamassassin -t -D d
spamd[22776]: prefork: child states: II
On 06/24/2016 08:40 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2016-06-24 20:22, G.H. (Spamassassin) wrote:
>
>>> I notice that the DNS whitelisting rules are missing too, and the SPF
>>> rules are replaced by a custom rule LOCAL_SPF_PASS.
>&
> On Sep 23, 2016, at 17.34, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 17:10 -0400, btb wrote:
>> On 2016.09.23 16.16, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 18:43 +0100, RW wrote:
Right, but the question here is why isn't a forwarding server also a
recursiv
Hi there,
There isn't really much documentation for any Windows related topics since
Michael Bell's tutorial site is offline as well as SpamAssassin for Win32
project being discontinued.
However, while compiling an own version of native (so not Cygwin based) Windows
SpamAssassin, I&
Original Message
> Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 15:04:22 -0700
> From: Quanah Gibson-Mount
> To: Dave Warren , users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Dealing with a bad network device affecting DNS
lookups
>
> --On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 3:52 PM -0700 Dave Warren
>
Original Message
> Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 18:39:58 -0700
> From: Quanah Gibson-Mount
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Dealing with a bad network device affecting DNS
lookups
>
> --On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2:26 AM +
On Aug 27, 2014, at 18.13, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:06 PM -0400 btb
> wrote:
>
>> hi-
>>
>> we have a system [zimbra] where users can select a message in the mua
>> interface and click a spam or not spam button. this generates a message
>> [containing t
On Sep 8, 2014, at 21.45, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Some discussion of the underlying issue.
>
> On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 02:59 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>> At the time of the 3.3.2 release, the .club TLD simply didn't exist. It
>> has been accepted by IANA just recently. Of course I was
/mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/201411.mbox/%3C5458FFE3.10404%40bitrate.net%3E
understanding now what's going on, i've been thinking a bit about this, while
the frequency of this trend seems to be continuing to increase. as a possibly
meaningless anecdote, it
> On Nov 14, 2014, at 00.35, John Hardin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote:
>
>> all of the emotional postulative opining aside, one possibility i have been
>> considering is having postfix delay relay of messages to the content filter
>> for a few minutes,
hi-
a message from yahoo seems to have matched FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, which from my
perspective, the message is not forged [see below pastebin - i hope i've not
removed anything of importance during anonymization]. i noted that dkim
authentication appears to have failed, which, while of interest f
. am i doing
something wrong? are my expectations misguided? i'm doing these tests as the
user named amavis, which the amavis software runs as.
>spamassassin --test-mode --debug < message3.txt
Dec 2 23:32:41.224 [27222] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all
Dec 2 23:32:41.224
hi-
i sent a message to the list yesterday, but have not yet seen it appear. can
someone check? my logs indicate successful delivery to mx1.us.apache.org:
Dec 3 17:48:24 mta postfix/smtp[10226]: 3jtFgN6Dfmz9s2b:
to=, relay=mx1.us.apache.org[140.211.11.136]:25,
delay=56, delays=0.45/0.02/30/
t; (Queue-Id: 70BD3358))
>>
>> thanks
>> -ben
> I see a message from you at 5:47 PM yesterday (UTC-05:00) which includes the
> output of some commands like sa-learn --dump magic.
> http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/different-results-when-using-debug-td113494.html
&
ayes: DB journal sync: last sync: ".$vars[7],'bayes','-1');
> + dbg("bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: %s", $vars[7]);
>
> The extra parameters shouldn't have been in that dbg call.
>
> See:
> Bug 7065 - Debug Mode breaks Bayes but only i
> On Nov 30, 2014, at 15.42, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On 30. nov. 2014 21.12.06 listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote:
>
>> http://dpaste.com/3XTYV0V.txt
>
> Is trusted_networks and internal_networks correct both for ipv4 and ipv6 ?
>
> Does it match settings in amavisd ?
>
> Both sa and am
this was discussed a while back, in the context of tlds with names of colors
[red, blue, pink, etc]. recently, i'm getting spam from the "rocks" tld [i can
share further detail if it's of interest]. what ultimately happened with the
color tlds, in terms of spamassassin?
based on domain name age?
>> the newer the domain, the higher the score is pushed up?
>
> that's URIBL_RHS_DOB
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/URIBL_RHS_DOB
>
> sadly it turned out to be not that relieable for a very high score
revisiting this - am
i hope another solicitation for this help request is ok.
> On Feb 04, 2015, at 09.19, btb wrote:
>
> hi-
>
> i happened to notice a bunch of old files in /tmp/, related to spamassassin.
> after a bit of testing, it looks like sa-compile isn't cleaning up after
>
ainly - we just do housekeeping in the cron job which runs sa-compile
for now, and that's just fine.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7138
-ben
Hi,
We created our own internal channel to feed our SpamAssassin installations with
some custom rules.
Recently tried to re-score a SpamAssassin rule using the channel files, but it
does not work.
When the channel is updated it correctly downloads the
"saInternalChannel_mydoamin_c
com.cf" containing the include directives as well
as the subfolder containing the actuall rules files.
"saInternalChannel" does not evaluate after "updates_spamassassin_org", so the
regular SpamAssassin updates overwrite our rescoring.
It seems we need to rename our channel to
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Menschel writes:
>Hello Loren, Mario,
>Wednesday, August 25, 2004, 12:39:23 PM, Loren wrote:
>LW> The specific rule you asked for would be written as
>LW> header SUB_UNDERSCORESSubject =~ /__/
>LW> scoreSUB_UNDERSCORES0.1
>LW> But don't use it, or
Hello:
I am running SpamAssassin 3.0.1 and have been having a problem. When I run
"sa-learn -D --dump magic" I get the following output.
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 1084 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000
I have just received spam from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a test which identifies that the description (Esmeralada
Bouchard) bears no resemblance to the given sender's address?
Similarly I sometimes receive spam mail to my email address but with a
completely unrecognisable description.
Are there
Point taken, but I still think it would be a valid test.
Like all SpamAssassin tests it should only be one of many indicators.
In particular all the ones that I receive I would expect to have "Mike" or
"Michael" in the description of my email address.
I would also like to be ab
o the original question:
Regardless of whether anyone thinks it is a good test or not, has anyone
yet created such a test?
> Mike Spamassassin wrote:
>
>>Point taken, but I still think it would be a valid test.
>>Like all SpamAssassin tests it should only be one of many indicators
I have installed SpamAssassin 3.0.3 on Debian Linux using the
SingleUserUnixInstall instructions on the SpamAssassin Wiki, as I do not
have root access.
Perl version is 5.6.1
Everything seems to work OK, but I get one error message.
When I run sa-learn --sync I get
"Parameter to use lib mu
two occurrences, one being a
file the other being a directory. The first one, the lib file was not part
of SpamAssassin or razor so I moved it, and now the error message has
gone.
Mike
Hi List,
Does anyone encounter this error and how do you fix it?
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/DomainKeys/Key/Public.pm line 67,
line 319.
Thanks
h SMTP id a20mr2782785waa.1187106414523;
Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dw ( [220.255.72.245])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
m10sm10662529waf.2007.08.14.08.46.51
(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
Hi,
Will ImageInfo be able to detect and catch this picture spam soon?
http://dreams.741.com/spam.gif
Thanks
first and spamassassin will considere it as spam !
Thank you for your help ...
Yves
first and spamassassin will considere it as spam !
the from address can be as easily faked as the to address. I have
seen on
this mailing list many reports from users whitelisting their own address
somehow and thus getting false positives.
What you are searching for, is whitelist_from_
Hi,
Is there a port which I have to open to allow pyzor to run properly? I keep
having the below error.
[26217] dbg: util: executable for pyzor was found at /usr/bin/pyzor
[26217] dbg: pyzor: pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
[26217] dbg: info: entering helper-app run mode
[26217] dbg: pyzor:
Put the .pm file that is attached in your M::SA::Plugins dir. Add to
your init.pre (or v310.pre) the following line.
Where is the usual Plugins dir?
regards
- Original Message -
From: "Gary Funck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 12:04 AM
Subject: RE: Image spam with inline jpeg image
Menno wrote:
Ramprasad wrote:
>
> But still this mail is getting thru
> http://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/imagespam.txt
>
I tested your
1 - 100 of 285 matches
Mail list logo
