[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
On 24.08.07 13:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
imagin a newsletters or order mail sent by an seller website with
the from address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have in my mail system an address like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With that, I can trace where my emails are sent in order to trace
spam and site that sell my email.
So, only [EMAIL PROTECTED] can send me mail on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (theorical)
The problem is that on a mailing list, the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is used by spamer and they send me spam
on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it possible to combine whitelist_from and whitelist_to in order
to tag "no spam" mails with 2 conditions :
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] AND whitelist_to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
So, if a spammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] send me a mail on
[EMAIL PROTECTED], the second conditions will be OK but
not the first and spamassassin will considere it as spam !
the from address can be as easily faked as the to address. I have
seen on
this mailing list many reports from users whitelisting their own address
somehow and thus getting false positives.
What you are searching for, is whitelist_from_rcvd which combined from
address with address of mailserver the mail was received from, or
better,
whitelist_auth, if the outgoing domain supports SPF (sellermail.com does
not...)
-- Matus UHLAR - fantomas,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to
receive
e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem
NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Your mouse has moved. Windows NT
will
now restart for changes to take to take effect. [OK]
Hummm, thanks,
I saw that and try but severals website send for example :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] send a mail to me on [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
the provider.com or webhosted.com that are internet or server hosted
provider.
The probleme in this case is that type of seller can change their sender
server. Meanwhile, it won't change the from or or to address (rarely).
So the from and to combinated are best that test on headers rcvd (for
me) ....
Yves
