> On Dec 08, 2014, at 19.28, Mark Martinec <mark.martinec...@ijs.si> wrote:
>
> Actually, looking at a diff of DBM.pm between 3.4.0 and 3.4.1
> I can see the taint bug has already been fixed by r1608413:
>
> @@ -814,3 +816,3 @@
> my @vars = $self->get_storage_variables();
> - dbg("bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: ".$vars[7],'bayes','-1');
> + dbg("bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: %s", $vars[7]);
>
> The extra parameters shouldn't have been in that dbg call.
>
> See:
> Bug 7065 - Debug Mode breaks Bayes but only if DBM storage is used
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7065
i've manually grafted that patch onto my 3.4.0, and it seems to do the trick,
thanks. i now see bayes results [and more consistent results overall] when
using --debug.
there is still a slight variation in scoring, however:
without --debug:
Content analysis details: (19.6 points, 5.0 required)
[...]
-3.8 AWL AWL: adjust score towards average for this sender
with --debug:
Content analysis details: (19.5 points, 5.0 required)
[...]
-3.7 AWL AWL: adjust score towards average for this sender
all other scoring is consistent. it's a trivial variation in this instance,
but does it mean something additional may not be working as intended? or just
something else i need to learn?
-ben
