On 23/12/11 11:29, Henrik K wrote: >> Performance with the database on physical disks simply wasn't >> keeping up with more than about double the average message rate (if >> that...), so I fell back to the "good enough" setup of putting the >> SA database on a RAMdisk,
> I guess it still boils down to basics. No matter what the database server is > used for, same principles apply. If you have slooow disks, then things are > going to be slow. As I understand it, if the MySQL query cache is tuned appropriately, then most of the queries should not be touching disk anyway? -- Mike Cardwell https://grepular.com/ https://twitter.com/mickeyc Professional http://cardwellit.com/ http://linkedin.com/in/mikecardwell PGP.mit.edu 0018461F/35BC AF1D 3AA2 1F84 3DC3 B0CF 70A5 F512 0018 461F
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
