> On Dec 19, 2015, at 04.35, Reindl Harald <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Am 19.12.2015 um 04:08 schrieb [email protected]: >> On Dec 17, 2015, at 13.16, Alfredo Saldanha <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> My second SA is a Zimbra server. >>> I use Zimbra SA only to drop the message in junk folder. >>> I don't want to clean at the Zimbra server, it is default behavior. >> >> for what it's worth, if you were to use amavis rather than a milter, you >> could just deliver mail directly from amavis to the zimbra mailbox server >> [bypassing the zimbra mta which you don't need in term of this] via lmtp >> [typically port 7025] > > how idoes a transport "lmtp:[host]:7025" depend on "use amavis rather than a > milter"
you're making assumptions. no one said it did. zimbra's mailbox server depends upon use of amavis for "it just works" integration. > milter rejects high scored spam and the rest takes the configured transport > which exists anyways and points now to the zimbra mta correct, that is how a milter works, be it irrelevant to the point.
