>
> Am 14.03.2015 um 16:45 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
> ...but as I mentioned before, training spam from mail to non-existent
> recipients may be even a good thing…
I would not train from mail to non-existent recipients, but would restrict to a
defined set of spamtraps (which may have bee
UHLAR - fantomas napsal(a):
Filip Havlí?ek wrote:
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
On 13.03.15 14:54, Filip Havlíček wrote:
there is my configuration:
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf: http://pastebin.com/PM5jN8wi
/etc/po
I manage email through ISPConfig, I think wildcard for any domain is not
set.
Dne 13.3.2015 v 16:02 Matus UHLAR - fantomas napsal(a):
Filip Havlí?ek wrote:
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
On 13.03.15 14:54
Filip Havlí?ek wrote:
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
On 13.03.15 14:54, Filip Havlíček wrote:
there is my configuration:
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf: http://pastebin.com/PM5jN8wi
/etc/postfix/main.cf: http
19:57 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:35:55 +0100
Filip Havlí?ek wrote:
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
On 04.03.15 14:37, RW wrote:
Why send them through SpamAssassin in the first place
Am 04.03.2015 um 19:57 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:35:55 +0100
Filip Havlí?ek wrote:
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
On 04.03.15 14:37, RW wrote:
Why send them through
On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:35:55 +0100
Filip Havlí?ek wrote:
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
On 04.03.15 14:37, RW wrote:
Why send them through SpamAssassin in the first place?
He apparently wants to filter mail
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Filip Havlíček wrote:
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
Reject invalid users at the MTA level during SMTP before the message even
hits SA.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp
On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:35:55 +0100
Filip Havlí?ek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
> addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
Why send them through SpamAssassin in the first place?
> Table bayes_token grow up to
amassassin/
no idea what "bayes_vars" is
Dne 4.3.2015 v 13:45 Reindl Harald napsal(a):
Am 04.03.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Filip Havlíček:
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
Table bayes_token grow up to
amassassin/
no idea what "bayes_vars" is
Dne 4.3.2015 v 13:45 Reindl Harald napsal(a):
Am 04.03.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Filip Havlíček:
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
Table bayes_token grow up to
Am 04.03.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Filip Havlíček:
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
Table bayes_token grow up to 0,5GB right now, because there are
thounsands of unknown email addresses like:
a...@hotmail.com
ablewi
Hi,
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
Table bayes_token grow up to 0,5GB right now, because there are
thounsands of unknown email addresses like:
a...@hotmail.com
ablewi...@hotmail.com
abl...@hotmail.com
On 11/5/2014 2:12 PM, John Woods wrote:
I did skim bug 5503 earlier, but didn't understand it at first.
Knowing the history now, it makes a little more sense, although I'm
still fuzzy on why the value of "3" for the body and head points is
important.
Can disagree. I don't know the history
On Wed, 5 Nov 2014, John Woods wrote:
As for Bayes strategies (and without starting a flamewar), we just
started implementing an IMAP folder in everyone's mailbox called "Learn As
Spam", that gets processed through "sa-learn --spam". It sounds like we may
need to leave auto-learning to SA's
Kevin,
I did skim bug 5503 earlier, but didn't understand it at first.
Knowing the history now, it makes a little more sense, although I'm
still fuzzy on why the value of "3" for the body and head points is
important.
It might be nice to have local.cf directives to allow admins to be
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 17:06:54 -0600
John Woods wrote:
> 1) How does SpamAssassin derive and sum the "body_only" and
> "head_only" points? It doesn't look like the body_only points
> correspond to any scores from individual tests.
Scoring uses one of four score sets, chosen according to whet
On 11/4/2014 6:06 PM, John Woods wrote:
Everyone,
We're having problems with auto learning on v3.4.0 that we aren't
having on v.3.3.2. The number of spam e-mails being auto-learned has
dropped significantly, and the amount of spam being let through (false
negatives) is higher as well.
Everyone,
We're having problems with auto learning on v3.4.0 that we aren't
having on v.3.3.2. The number of spam e-mails being auto-learned has
dropped significantly, and the amount of spam being let through (false
negatives) is higher as well.
For reference, here is a snippet from
> One crucial thing you didn't post: you ran the learning as root. Is the
> user that spamd is running as also root? The bayes database is
> user-specific, and a common problem is to train the database as a
> different user than the MTA+spamd is running under.
Owner and Group of the folder .spamas
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:52:45 +0200
Frank Walter wrote:
> There is very few spam in the spam folder and then these mails have a
> very small Bayes score (e.g. 0.8). But there is more spam in the
> inbox.
>
> I thought, if I put a mail into the spam folder and after sa learned
> it, there would be
Hello John,
Friday, June 1, 2012, 3:31:23 PM, you wrote:
JH> One crucial thing you didn't post: you ran the learning as root. Is the
JH> user that spamd is running as also root? The bayes database is
JH> user-specific, and a common problem is to train the database as a
JH> different user than
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012, Frank Walter wrote:
There is very few spam in the spam folder and then these mails have a very
small Bayes score (e.g. 0.8).
But there is more spam in the inbox.
I thought, if I put a mail into the spam folder and after sa learned it, there
would be no question that the Ba
There is very few spam in the spam folder and then these mails have a very
small Bayes score (e.g. 0.8).
But there is more spam in the inbox.
I thought, if I put a mail into the spam folder and after sa learned it, there
would be no question that the Bayes score for this mail would be high, the
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:52:05 +0200
francwal...@gmx.net wrote:
> But when I send an email with the content and Subject of an old
> spam-mail this passes without much bayes-score:
>
> What am I doing wrong?
You are testing a message that's part spam and part non-spam and
expecting BAYES to detec
Hello
I use SpamAssassin 3.3.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 with Postfix 2.9.1-4 and AMaViS 2.6.5
All the time I move Spam when I get, to my Spam-folder, where I have some spam
together since the last two years.
All night I use the script "salearn-from-mails", to learn from the spam which
is:
#!/bin/bash -
On 12/16/11 05:53, RW wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:54:36 +0100
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:30:31 +, Martin Hepworth wrote:
Created a shared iMap or similar email account with a spam and ham
folder for users to drag email into (not forward as that breaks
headers in thing l
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:54:36 +0100
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:30:31 +, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> > Created a shared iMap or similar email account with a spam and ham
> > folder for users to drag email into (not forward as that breaks
> > headers in thing like outlook)
>
> y
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:30:31 +, Martin Hepworth wrote:
Created a shared iMap or similar email account with a spam and ham
folder for users to drag email into (not forward as that breaks
headers in thing like outlook)
yes, here i found that dovecot-antispam helpfull in the way that users
ju
Created a shared iMap or similar email account with a spam and ham folder
for users to drag email into (not forward as that breaks headers in thing
like outlook)
Then find one of the many perl scripts lying about the net to grab this
email and SA-learn it to the main bayes db.
Martin
On Friday,
Hi all,
I have some spamtraps which get lots of spam. After a few precautions, I
use sa-learn to train a single Bayes profile. This profile is used for
many of my users. A significant amount of other users maintain their own
Bayes profiles, and I'd like to make this training apply to their
pr
I've been thinking about using bayes in learning mode, but I want to
do it without disturbing my current mail setup.
I thought I might (using procmail) channel a copy of all incoming mail
through spamassassin with bayes learning turned on.
I'd want bayes learning off in the main mail
On 19.2.2010 12:42, tonjg wrote:
>
>
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>
>> That is not the recipe I meant. That calls SA yes, but does not
>> "reject". I can't provide a recipe for procmail as I personally use
>> maildrop, but the recipe that is needed is one filing the spam to a spam
>> folder (or /de
e golden rule for my server is that spam is not diverted to any folder.
Spam gets rejected at smtp. Is that what you meant by overkill?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/is-bayes-learning--tp27616380p27652339.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 18.02.10 09:56, tonjg wrote:
> well this has certainly thrown a spanner in the works and I don't know what
> to do next. I was under the impression that sa was scanning my mail and red
> flagging any spams, then mimedefang would kick in rejecting the email at
> smtp. I'm completely confused now
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 19.2.2010 1:48, Chris wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:59 -0800, tonjg wrote:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
How does MimeDefang reject anything if it does not scan it? Your log
header sample looked like it was scanned by MimeDefang. Propably MD
cal
On 19.2.2010 1:48, Chris wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:59 -0800, tonjg wrote:
>>
>> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>>
>>> How does MimeDefang reject anything if it does not scan it? Your log
>>> header sample looked like it was scanned by MimeDefang. Propably MD
>>> calls SpamAssassin in it's scan pr
On 19.2.2010 1:48, Chris wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:59 -0800, tonjg wrote:
>>
>> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>>
>>> How does MimeDefang reject anything if it does not scan it? Your log
>>> header sample looked like it was scanned by MimeDefang. Propably MD
>>> calls SpamAssassin in it's scan pr
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:59 -0800, tonjg wrote:
>
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> >
> > How does MimeDefang reject anything if it does not scan it? Your log
> > header sample looked like it was scanned by MimeDefang. Propably MD
> > calls SpamAssassin in it's scan process just like amavisd does.
> >
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:56 -0800, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
> well this has certainly thrown a spanner in the works and I don't know what
> to do next. I was under the impression that sa was scanning my mail and red
> flagging any spams, then mimedefang would kick in rejecting the email at
>
uot;reject spam" would be an overkill. A
> simple procmail recipe would do it without any extra process.
but md is a mail filter designed to process mail, how is that an overkill?
and where would one find a simple procmail recipe?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/is
add_header 10_default_prefs.cf
# grep add_header 10_default_prefs.cf
grep: 10_default_prefs.cf: No such file or directory
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/is-bayes-learning--tp27616380p27642949.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 08:16 -0800, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
> Matus UHLAR wrote:
> > you seem to be running mimedefang which takes care about the e-mail. I
> > have no idea how does mimedefang interact with spamassassin, but I think
> > you should ask your question in mimedefang mailing list
On 18.2.2010 18:16, tonjg wrote:
>
>
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> you seem to be running mimedefang which takes care about the e-mail. I
>> have no idea how does mimedefang interact with spamassassin, but I think
>> you should ask your question in mimedefang mailing list, or at least
>> sea
d auto-learn.
thanks but I'm only using mimedefang to reject email recognised by
spamassassin, I'm not using md to scan for spam.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/is-bayes-learning--tp27616380p27638511.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > you may have autolearn plugin not active. What does X-Spam-Status header
> > in your mail say?
On 17.02.10 05:48, tonjg wrote:
> it says:
> X-Spam-Score: 4.463 ()
> BAYES_60,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_ONLY
> X-Scanned-By:
don't know what BAYES_60 means.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/is-bayes-learning--tp27616380p27623876.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Arthur Dent-6 wrote:
>
> Try # date -d @1266390928
ah yes thanks Arthur that worked:
[r...@home admin]# date -d @1266390928
Wed Feb 17 07:15:28 GMT 2010
[r...@home admin]#
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/is-bayes-learning--tp27616380p27623785.html
Sent fr
> RW-15 wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:29:38 +0100
> > Mikael Syska wrote:
> > Watching nham, nspam counts is more meaningful.
On 17.02.10 04:18, tonjg wrote:
> my nspam and nham counts look the same as they were two weeks ago without
> change, which makes me think that bayes isn't learning...
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 04:16 -0800, tonjg wrote:
>
> Mikael Syska wrote:
> >
> > [r...@freebsd /]# date -r 1266318121
> > Tue Feb 16 12:02:01 CET 2010
> >
> > newsest atime should tell you when it last learned from a message.
>
> thanks for your response, I ran sa-learn --dump magic:
> 0.000
essage in context:
http://old.nabble.com/is-bayes-learning--tp27616380p27622878.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
0 non-token data: last expire
reduction count
but I don't get the same results as you. I get:
[r...@home admin]# date -r 1266390928
date: 1266390928: No such file or directory
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/is-bayes-learning--tp27616380p2762285
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 15:22 -0800, tonjg wrote:
> I've got a feeling that the spamassassin on my machine is improving in the
> way it recognises spam but I'd like to be sure it's not just my imagination.
> I did my first manual bayes learn about 2 weeks ago using 200 spams and 200
> hams, the proce
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 15:22 -0800, tonjg wrote:
> I've got a feeling that the spamassassin on my machine is improving in the
> way it recognises spam but I'd like to be sure it's not just my imagination.
> I did my first manual bayes learn about 2 weeks ago using 200 spams and 200
> hams, the proce
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:29:38 +0100
Mikael Syska wrote:
> newsest atime should tell you when it last learned from a message.
Token atimes get updated when you scan a mail.
Watching nham, nspam counts is more meaningful.
ge in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/is-bayes-learning--tp27616380p27616380.html
> Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
at autolearn is enabled
by default and kicks in after 200 emails learnt, but is there a way to tell
whether bayes is actually learning?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/is-bayes-learning--tp27616380p27616380.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 07:27 -0800, smfabac wrote:
> I see that there is no official answer to the question. "what is the message
> size limit where sa-learn fails."
>
If you use something spamc rather than using sa_learn you can gain some
flexibility due to the places and hosts where you can run
Smfabac wrote on Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:27:19 -0800 (PST):
> The question "So, does the documentation on sa-learn indicate that there is
> a
> size limit on the messages to be processed?" is a veiled request to the SA
> developers/maintainers that people may be interested in that information.
If yo
re sa-learn fails."
The question "So, does the documentation on sa-learn indicate that there is
a
size limit on the messages to be processed?" is a veiled request to the SA
developers/maintainers that people may be interested in that information.
--
View this mes
Smfabac wrote on Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:20:06 -0800 (PST):
> So, does the documentation on sa-learn indicate that there is
> a size limit on the message to be processed?
Why not check yourself?
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
EDEC--
3404
3405 ^A^A^A^A
$ sa-learn --showdots --ham --mbox notspam
.
Learned tokens from 1 message(s) (1 message(s) examined)
$
$ wc notspam
lines: 3405 words: 18735 characters: 130876 notspam
So, does the documentation on sa-learn indicate that there is
a size limit on the
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, smfabac wrote:
$ sa-learn --showdots --ham --mbox notspam
Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 message(s) examined)
Still no luck.
Are we sure the notspam file is clean? Try trimming it down to just one or
two messages, and see how it goes
- C
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, smfabac wrote:
Is there a message size limit for sa-learn?
Yes, there is, and sadly sa-learn does not explicitly tell you a message
has been skipped because it's too large.
If there's a non-text attachment try deleteing it and re-learning the
message.
--
John Hardin
On 12.02.10 09:17, smfabac wrote:
> On UNIX any file is a mbox file if it contains mail messages in the form:
>
> ^A^A^A^A
> mail headers
> mail body
> ^A^A^A^A
> ^A^A^A^A
> Next Message mail headers
> mail body
> ^A^A^A^A
mmdf, not mbox.
> And my not-spam file meets this requirement:
>
> ^A^A^
ns from 0 message(s) (0 message(s) examined)
Still no luck.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/bayes-learning-%270-messages-found%27-tp27358517p27576922.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, smfabac wrote:
Now that we're all on the same page. How do I find out why sa-learn
is not processing the legal not-spam file? To re-cap, "sa-learn --spam
--mbox isspam" works but "sa-learn --ham --mbox not-spam" is not
working.
Well, I would expect if this suggestion were
O
Uni
Is there a message size limit for sa-learn? The message in not-spam is
plain ascii, no html.
$ wc -l not-spam
6408 not-spam <-- sa-learn --ham failed on not-spam folder with one
message
$
$ wc -l isspam
1039 isspam <-- sa-learn --spam worked on isspam folder with one
message
$
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/bayes-learning-%270-messages-found%27-tp27358517p27573012.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:51:12 +
RW wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:17:54 -0800 (PST)
> smfabac wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Mark,
> >
> > On UNIX any file is a mbox file if it contains mail messages in the
> > form:
> >
> > ^A^A^A^A
> > mail headers
> > mail body
> > ^A^A^A^A
> > ^A^A^A^A
> > Nex
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:17:54 -0800 (PST)
smfabac wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> On UNIX any file is a mbox file if it contains mail messages in the
> form:
>
> ^A^A^A^A
> mail headers
> mail body
> ^A^A^A^A
> ^A^A^A^A
> Next Message mail headers
> mail body
> ^A^A^A^A
I don't know what that is, but i
ed
...
=_4B73B21B.8398EDEC--
^A^A^A^A
Also, reading the file with the command "mail -f not-spam" launches
the UNIX mail reader showing that the file is legal mbox file.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/bayes-learning-%270-messages-found%27-tp27358517p27566692.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
tonjg wrote:
> I'm trying to run:
> sa-learn --spam --showdots --dir /path/to...mbox
> but it fails with:
> 'Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 messages examined)'
> my spam mail is in a file called mbox but when I run the above command to
> the directory containg mbox it always fails with the '0
not-spam in the past so
why is it failing me now?
how do I determine why the message is not being processed by sa-learn?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/bayes-learning-%270-messages-found%27-tp27358517p27566005.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If what you presented in your message is actually the command you used, then it
might be looking for some input from the keyboard - you don't illustrate having
specified the particular file you want it to use following the '--mbox' option,
you have "--ham" in that position on the line. I have n
r half an
hour now. Is this normal?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/bayes-learning-%270-messages-found%27-tp27358517p27358771.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
it's okay - I found the solution at:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/sa-learn.html
the command needed --mbox to be included. I added this and the learning
worked.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/bayes-learning-%270-messages-found%27-tp27358517p27358559
On Thursday 28 January 2010 17:16:04 tonjg wrote:
> spamassassin.i386 0:3.2.5-1.el4
>
> I'm trying to run:
> sa-learn --spam --showdots --dir /path/to...mbox
> but it fails with:
> 'Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 messages examined)'
> my spam mail is in a file called mbox but when I run the a
ew this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/bayes-learning-%270-messages-found%27-tp27358517p27358517.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:24:31 -0400
Micah Anderson wrote:
If I understand things properly, because I've got these
> setup in my trusted_networks, then these previous hops will be
> checked in RBLs, so the spam is more detectable.
That doesn't really help. If you think about it, tests that run on
I get a significant amount of spam that comes through mailing lists that
I am legitimately subscribed to, either they are the administration
emails asking me if I want to approve the "email" or not, or they are
messages that make it through the list.
These messages are either hitting ALL_TRUSTED,
I am using the spamassassin that is installed when you install
cPanel. I have been attempting to get the automatic bayes learning
to work. I have set use_bayes to 1 in my properties file but it
doesn't seem to be working. I say this because it appears that the
only time the bayes_toks
New to SA 3.2.4 running on Ubuntu 8.04. I noticed SA attaches an
analysis summary for all mails it detects as spam which is a nice
feature. However, I'm wondering if this impacts sa-learn? Can I simply
run sa-learn on mails that have the analysis attached? I also noticed
I'm not seeing Bayes pa
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 03:23:38AM +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> I wonder why it is called "magic".
Because the data that is being dumped is from the metadata in the DB, which we
store using "magic" tokens, since they're tokens that can't possibly exist in
the
DB through normal means.
--
Ra
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> Matt Florido wrote:
>>> I'm not seeing Bayes participating in the scoring. Is
>>> this because it's new and my Bayes db hasn't been fully
>>> trained?
>>
>> Yes. You need 200 each ham and spam.
>
> You can use sa-learn to dump the database stats and see
> how many o
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Matt Florido wrote:
> > I'm not seeing Bayes participating in the scoring. Is this because it's
> > new and my Bayes db hasn't been fully trained?
>
> Yes. You need 200 each ham and spam.
You can use sa-learn to dump the database stats and see how many of
each have been
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:08:22AM -0700, Matt Florido wrote:
> feature. However, I'm wondering if this impacts sa-learn? Can I simply
> run sa-learn on mails that have the analysis attached? I also noticed
Yes. sa-learn removes markup before doing the processing.
> I'm not seeing Bayes part
New to SA 3.2.4 running on Ubuntu 8.04. I noticed SA attaches an
analysis summary for all mails it detects as spam which is a nice
feature. However, I'm wondering if this impacts sa-learn? Can I simply
run sa-learn on mails that have the analysis attached? I also noticed
I'm not seeing Bayes pa
On Saturday 24 March 2007 23:04, Marc Perkel wrote:
> The learn-spam script looks like this:
>
> /usr/bin/spamc -d euclid.ctyme.com -x -t 15 -L spam > /dev/null 2> /dev/null
> /bin/echo "" > /dev/null
>
> The echo command is just there so it returns a "0" and exim doesn't
> complain. Probably a b
Marc Perkel wrote:
> Trying to set up spamc/spamd learning. Have a dedicated spamd server
> that is fed from several MTA machines running exim. On the exim side
> I'm piping messages into spamc as follows:
>
> unseen pipe "/etc/exim/scripts/learn-spam"
>
> The learn-spam script looks like this:
>
>
Trying to set up spamc/spamd learning. Have a dedicated spamd server
that is fed from several MTA machines running exim. On the exim side I'm
piping messages into spamc as follows:
unseen pipe "/etc/exim/scripts/learn-spam"
The learn-spam script looks like this:
/usr/bin/spamc -d euclid.ctyme
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, mouss wrote:
- you are trusting your users to make the right decision. The
problem is that different people have different opinions of what
is spam and what is not. Things get even worst if one user isn't
honest...
That's a problem with *any* schem
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, mouss wrote:
> - you are trusting your users to make the right decision. The
> problem is that different people have different opinions of what
> is spam and what is not. Things get even worst if one user isn't
> honest...
That's a problem with *any* scheme for allowing the u
Owen Mehegan wrote:
To make it easier for my users to train my server's Bayes database, I
set up a user with the following procmail recipe in its .procmailrc:
:0
* < 256000
{
:0c: spamassassin.spamlock
| sa-learn --spam
:0: spamassassin.filelock
spam
}
The idea is for peopl
To make it easier for my users to train my server's Bayes database, I set up a user with the following procmail recipe in its .procmailrc::0* < 256000 { :0c: spamassassin.spamlock | sa-learn --spam :0: spamassassin.filelock spam }The idea is for people to redirect (not forward) uncaught
Stop receiving emails.
Stop the SpamAssassin service once the incoming mail spool is empty.
Then kill all vestiges of spamd or spamassassin that might still be
running from previously improperly terminated sessions.
Then run sa-learn.
If it STILL hangs with this lock you'd a problem somewhere "fer
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 10:46 pm, you wrote:
> I am new to spamassassin. Thank you so much for your help and Tyler too.
Thanks.. I'm not the expert.. I just use it!
> Bayes autolearn is enabled when I feed Bayes with the 1500 emails manually
> using the "sa-learn" command. Does it cause the
Jonathan Nie wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> I am new to spamassassin. Thank you so much for your help and Tyler too.
>
> Bayes autolearn is enabled when I feed Bayes with the 1500 emails manually
> using the "sa-learn" command. Does it cause the problem?
It can.. However it shouldn't cause it all the tim
Hi Matt,
I am new to spamassassin. Thank you so much for your help and Tyler too.
Bayes autolearn is enabled when I feed Bayes with the 1500 emails manually
using the "sa-learn" command. Does it cause the problem?
I also checked the Bayes database directory and found two stale lock files
"bayes.
Jonathan Nie wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I got a problem when I try to feed Bayes with large number of emails
> (over 1500). It just hang there and I got the the following error
> messages from maillog file:
>
> .bayes: cannot open bayes databases /spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock
> failed: File ex
Tyler Nally wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 February 2006 05:06 pm, Jonathan Nie wrote:
>> Greetings!
>>
>> I got a problem when I try to feed Bayes with large number of emails
>> (over 1500). It just hang there and I got the the following error
>> messages from maillog file:
>>
>> .bayes: cannot open b
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
