On 19.2.2010 12:42, tonjg wrote: > > > Jari Fredriksson wrote: >> >> That is not the recipe I meant. That calls SA yes, but does not >> "reject". I can't provide a recipe for procmail as I personally use >> maildrop, but the recipe that is needed is one filing the spam to a spam >> folder (or /dev/null). > > the golden rule for my server is that spam is not diverted to any folder. > Spam gets rejected at smtp. Is that what you meant by overkill? >
No, if you want it really rejected at smtp time, the solution is OK for it. My "lighter" approach would have been a spam folder for spam but it does not serve your purposes. -- http://www.iki.fi/jarif/ One of the most striking differences between a cat and a lie is that a cat has only nine lives. -- Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
