On 19.2.2010 1:48, Chris wrote: > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:59 -0800, tonjg wrote: >> >> Jari Fredriksson wrote: >>> >>> How does MimeDefang reject anything if it does not scan it? Your log >>> header sample looked like it was scanned by MimeDefang. Propably MD >>> calls SpamAssassin in it's scan process just like amavisd does. >>> >>> Using a perl package just to "reject spam" would be an overkill. A >>> simple procmail recipe would do it without any extra process. >> >> but md is a mail filter designed to process mail, how is that an overkill? >> and where would one find a simple procmail recipe? >> > > This is what I use, may not be the greatest but it's been working for > years: > > :0 fw : $ASSASSINLOCK > * < 500000 > | /usr/local/bin/spamc -f >
That is not the recipe I meant. That calls SA yes, but does not "reject". I can't provide a recipe for procmail as I personally use maildrop, but the recipe that is needed is one filing the spam to a spam folder (or /dev/null). -- http://www.iki.fi/jarif/ Your sister swims out to meet troop ships.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
