Charles Gregory wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, smfabac wrote: >> Now that we're all on the same page. How do I find out why sa-learn >> is not processing the legal not-spam file? To re-cap, "sa-learn --spam >> --mbox isspam" works but "sa-learn --ham --mbox not-spam" is not >> working. > > Well, I would expect if this suggestion were right you would have had all > sorts of warning messages about syntax, but just in case.... > > Maybe linux is interpreting the dash in the filename as a switch > indicator? Try enclosing the file name in single quotes or use a filename > without a dash... > > - C > > > >
$ ls -lt | head -3 total 15868 -rw------- 1 smf group 249046 Feb 13 02:37 not-spam -rw-rw-rw- 1 smf group 94762 Feb 13 02:29 isspam $ mv not-spam notspam $ ls -lt | head -3 total 15868 -rw------- 1 smf group 249046 Feb 13 02:37 notspam -rw-rw-rw- 1 smf group 94762 Feb 13 02:29 isspam $ sa-learn --showdots --ham --mbox notspam Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 message(s) examined) $ On the off chance that permissions on the file is an issue: $ chmod 666 notspam $ ls -lt | head -3 total 15868 -rw-rw-rw- 1 smf group 249046 Feb 13 02:37 notspam -rw-rw-rw- 1 smf group 94762 Feb 13 02:29 isspam $ sa-learn --showdots --ham --mbox notspam Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 message(s) examined) Still no luck. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/bayes-learning-%270-messages-found%27-tp27358517p27576922.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
