On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, mouss wrote: > - you are trusting your users to make the right decision. The > problem is that different people have different opinions of what > is spam and what is not. Things get even worst if one user isn't > honest...
That's a problem with *any* scheme for allowing the users to train Bayes themselves. In practice, however, I think you'll see much more apathy than stupidity or malice. My problem was with getting my users to even *look at* their marginal-spams folder and classify the messages. Ever. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ ICQ#15735746 http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] key: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Senator, when you took your oath of office, you placed your hand on the Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution. You didn't place your hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible. -- Jamie Raskin, Professor of Law at American University, testifying before the Maryland Senate -----------------------------------------------------------------------
