Hi, [r...@freebsd ]# sa-learn --dump magic 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: nspam 0.000 0 22 0 non-token data: nham 0.000 0 793 0 non-token data: ntokens 0.000 0 1266272147 0 non-token data: oldest atime 0.000 0 1266318121 0 non-token data: newest atime 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last journal sync atime 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expiry atime 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expire atime delta 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expire reduction count [r...@freebsd /]# date -r 1266318121 Tue Feb 16 12:02:01 CET 2010
newsest atime should tell you when it last learned from a message. Yes, my system is new and not yet using bayes ... mvh On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:22 AM, tonjg <t...@freeuk.com> wrote: > > I've got a feeling that the spamassassin on my machine is improving in the > way it recognises spam but I'd like to be sure it's not just my imagination. > I did my first manual bayes learn about 2 weeks ago using 200 spams and 200 > hams, the process appeared to go properly. I read that autolearn is enabled > by default and kicks in after 200 emails learnt, but is there a way to tell > whether bayes is actually learning? > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/is-bayes-learning--tp27616380p27616380.html > Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
