, including how to make reservations for discounted hotel
rooms in Halifax. Discounted rates will only be available until Sept.
5, so reserve soon!
--Rich, for the event planning team
your talk proposals in now!
Details here: https://apachecon.com/acna2022/cfp.html
--Rich, for the ApacheCon Planners
:
Community
Big Data
Search
IoT
Cloud
Fintech
Pulsar
Tomcat
You can submit your session proposals starting today at
https://cfp.apachecon.com/
Rich Bowen, on behalf of the ApacheCon Planners
apachecon.com
@apachecon
lack
And follow us on Twitter - https://twitter.com/apachecon - for tips and
announcements during the event.
See you tomorrow!
--
Rich Bowen, VP Conferences
The Apache Software Foundation
https://apachecon.com/
@apachecon
vability; Search; Tomcat.
We will also feature keynotes from Ashley Wolf, Mark Cox, Alison Parker
and Michael Weinberg.
Details on the schedule, and these keynotes, can be found at
https://www.apachecon.com/acah2021/tracks/
We look forward to seeing you at this year’s ApacheCon!
– Rich Bowen,
forward to reviewing your contribution to one of the most
popular open source software events in the world!
Rich, for the ApacheCon Planners
--
Rich Bowen, VP Conferences
The Apache Software Foundation
https://apachecon.com/
@apachecon
. Submit your talks today at
https://acna2020.jamhosted.net/
We hope to see you at the event!
Rich Bowen, VP Conferences, The Apache Software Foundation
/Other
The CFP will close Friday, May 1, 2020 8:00 AM (America/New_York time).
Submit early, submit often, at https://apachecon.com/acna2020/cfp
Rich, for the ApacheCon Planners
also be running
ApacheCon Europe in Berlin in October. Details of that event are at
https://aceu19.apachecon.com/
Follow us on Twitter - @ApacheCon - for all the latest updates. See you
in Las Vegas!
Rich Bowen, VP Conferences, The ASF
rbo...@apache.org
http://apachecon.com/
ht,
and this seemed to suffice.
Since I'm using amavisd-new, I also killed off (had to use "kill -9")
all of the amavisd-new child processes (which were spinning at 100% and
didn't go away when I stopped the service). After doing this and
restarting amavisd-new, my mail queue emptied in no time.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
on at https://apachecon.com/aceu19/ .
Sponsorship opportunities are available for all events, with details
listed on each event’s site at http://apachecon.com/.
We look forward to seeing you!
Rich, for the ApacheCon Planners
@apachecon
areer advice.
Please take a look at: http://www.apachecon.com/usroadshow18/
(Note: You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to one
or more mailing lists at The Apache Software Foundation.)
Rich, for the ApacheCon Planners
--
rbo...@apache.org
http://apachecon.com
@ApacheCon
.
Register today at http://apachecon.com/acna18 and we’ll see you in Montreal!
--
Rich Bowen
VP, Conferences, The Apache Software Foundation
h...@apachecon.com
@ApacheCon
if your company wants to sponsor this
event, get in touch at h...@apachecon.com for opportunities that are
still available.
See you in Montreal!
Rich Bowen
VP Conferences, The Apache Software Foundation
h...@apachecon.com
@ApacheCon
[1] http://cloudstackcollab.org/
[2] http
chnically possible* to create a Spamassassin rule which would
match this sort of "From:" line?
And assuming it can be done, is it *worthwhile* to do it? I do realize
some perfectly legitimate "From:" lines conform to this same pattern,
and the only way to really tell the difference may be via AI or a real
human brain.
--
*Rich Wales*
ri...@richw.org
@ApacheCon on Twitter to be the first to hear announcements about
keynotes, the schedule, evening events, and everything you can expect to
see at the event.
See you in Montréal!
Sincerely, Rich Bowen, V.P. Events,
on behalf of the entire ApacheCon team
[1] http://www.apachecon.com/acna18
[2
onsensus on this sort of thing? Thanks for any feedback.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
ing list:
https://lists.apache.org/list.html?apachecon-disc...@apache.org
* Podcasts and speaker interviews: http://feathercast.apache.org/
* IRC: #apachecon on the https://freenode.net/
We look forward to seeing you in Miami!
--
Rich Bowen - VP Conferences, The Apache Software Foundation
http:
Thanks, and we look forward to seeing you in Miami!
--
Rich Bowen
VP Conferences, Apache Software Foundation
rbo...@apache.org
Twitter: @apachecon
(You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to a dev@ or
users@ list of some Apache Software Foundation project. If you do not
wish to
pachecon on the Freenode IRC network. Or
contact me - rbo...@apache.org - with any questions or concerns.
Thanks!
Rich Bowen, VP Conferences, Apache Software Foundation
--
(You've received this email because you're on a dev@ or users@ mailing
list of an Apache Software Foundation projec
today at http://apachecon.com/ and submit your
talks. ApacheCon Miami is going to be our best ApacheCon yet, and you,
and your project, can’t afford to miss it.
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@apache.org
VP, Conferences
http://apachecon.com
@apachecon
> try disabling any local rules to see if it helps. . . .
> it's apparently about rules, not about mail content.
I temporarily removed my local.cf file, but I still got the warning.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
On 11/23/16 21:13, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> and output to this ticket of "spamassassin --lint -D 2>&1 >/tmp.txt"
> so all installed plugins versions are known, in case its already fixed
Done.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
> /OK, I can repro on trunk: . . . It's that very long block of QP
> blanks right at the end. . . . Please open a bug and attach that
> spample as a repro test case./
Done. (https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7374)
--
*Rich Wales*
ri...@richw.org
ividual e-mails that generate this
diagnostic, but I've looked at them and can't see anything obviously
strange.
Any thoughts?
--
*Rich Wales*
ri...@richw.org
r at @apachecon
* Join us on IRC, at #apachecon on the Freenode IRC network
* Join the apachecon-discuss mailing list by sending email to
apachecon-discuss-subscr...@apache.org
* Or contact me directly at rbo...@apache.org with questions,
comments, or to volunteer to help
See you in Sev
speakers. So make sure your
abstracts clearly explain what you'll be talking about.
For further updated about ApacheCon, follow us on Twitter, @ApacheCon,
or drop by our IRC channel, #apachecon on the Freenode IRC network.
--
Rich Bowen
WWW: http://apachecon.com/
Twitter: @ApacheCon
Community growth starts by talking with those interested in your
project. ApacheCon North America is coming, are you?
We are delighted to announce that the Call For Presentations (CFP) is
now open for ApacheCon North America. You can submit your proposed
sessions at
http://events.linuxfoundation.o
> /do we have your permission to add this rule to SA's masscheck /
> autopromoting ?/
Yes, by all means, go ahead.
--
*Rich Wales*
ri...@richw.org
4, or 17196.
Here is a sample rule which will detect the extraneous semicolon.
header BOGUS_RCVD_AMAVIS Received =~
/\(amavisd-new,\s+port\s+\d+\).+;\s*for\b/
--
*Rich Wales*
Palo Alto, CA
ri...@richw.org
ith a smaller group of
developers, so as not to give too many ideas to the black hats? :-)
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
alled Zen" is in error -- the ZEN
list combines SBL, XBL, and PBL.)
Comments on this? Am I missing something here?
Rich Wales
Palo Alto, CA
ri...@richw.org
/mail/spamassassin. Now everything's
working.
It was the missing v320.pre file, and the .pre files need to be in
/etc/mail/spamassassin and not the rules subdirectory.
Many thanks to everyone!
Rich
d and downloaded v320.pre into /etc/mail/spamassassin/rules and
still get the error. What have I missed in getting SA to see the new .pre
file is now present and calls for the check_main to be run?
Thanks,
Rich
line
164.
the above error says me you dont have any pre files loaded at all
What do I do to load them?
Thanks,
Rich
not scan! at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line
164.
What plugin do I need to have loaded to resolve this error?
Rich
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, David Michaels wrote:
find / -name spamassassin -print
/etc/mail/spamassassin
/etc/mail/spamassassin/blib/script/spamassassin
/etc/mail/spamassassin/spamassassin
/opt/src/slackbuilds/spamassassin
/usr/bin/spamassassin
/usr/share/spamassassin
Rich
this is a non-default
location, where should they be? FWIW, that's were everything's been for
years and I've had no problems until yesterday when running sa-learn kicked
up that error.
Thanks,
Rich
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Warren Togami wrote:
Try wiping out /var/lib/spamassassin/*, does spamassassin work then?
Warren,
I don't have a spamassassin directory in /var/lib/.
Rich
s /usr/bin/spamd from starting again. Perhaps
someone here can tell me how to resolve this problem so I can once again
invoke spamd.
Rich
alled, like mine 'spam-uncaught'. She saves spam messages there, then cron
will scp that file to the server where I can run sa-learn on them (or have
cron do that, too).
That'll work.
Many thanks,
Rich
or me.
My question is what I need to do to set up the equivalent abilities on my
wife's laptop (running xubuntu-9.10). Do I need to install SA on her
machine, too, or is there a way to filter her mail through the server's
installation?
Pointers, guidance, and suggestions are needed.
TIA,
Rich
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 16:00 +0100, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> On 12/7/2009 3:42 PM, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> > http://pastebin.com/m7c1c17d
> >
> > Interesting insofar as it appears to be whitelisted??? Is this some kind
> > of well known US email or hosting se
http://pastebin.com/m7c1c17d
Interesting insofar as it appears to be whitelisted??? Is this some kind
of well known US email or hosting service?
Sane missed it, the dnsbl's have missed it and the content filtering has
missed it. So it's a tasty morsel of spam :-)
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 12:02 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> On 6-Dec-2009, at 02:24, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> > A truly clean company that always uses opt-in and never spams has
> > nothing to fear from any anti-spam measure.
>
> Oh, that is CERTAINLY not true. It&#x
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 18:07 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
>
> FYI, abuse@ is specified in RFC2142, and need not be explicitly listed
> in the whois.
Thanks. I knew it was somewhere :-)
My figures for date the UK in the last 72 hours: 118 mails
*all* HABEAS accredited.
==
CHECKING DNSBL WHITE LISTS
==
80.75.69.201
NOT WHITELISTED:
sa-other.bondedsender.org, resl.emailreg.org, plus.bondedsender.org,
ips.whitelisted.org
WHITELISTED:
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 22:12 -0800, R-Elists wrote:
>
> frankly, nothing against them, yet if an organization really needs Return
> Path to get their email through to mailboxes without rejection, then doesn't
> the originator of the email have problems?
Of course they do! That's why ESP's exist -
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 15:57 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>
> > In the UK I'm more interested in the offences sending UBE/UCE commits
> > under the Protection from Harassment Act, Section 42 of the
> > Telecommunications Act and pos
> On Dec 4, 2009, at 12:19, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> > That wouldn't ever happen because the whole point of the CAN-SPAM
> > act is to allow the spammers to send out the "first" mail.
The CAN-SPAM spiel is an American phenomena that holds questionable
relevance to the rest of the world (some
I've just had another one to a honeypot - care of myspace. My dog does
not have a myspace account. Again, this is a harvested email address.
204.16.33.75WHITELISTED:sa-accredit.habeas.com
Whilst I appreciate that nobody would turn their noses up at taking $$$
from someone like mys
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 18:11 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>
> > This was raised as the IP appeared in HABEAS and for a few hours it
> > 'vanished' from the list. It's back there now, but DateTheUk is now
> > pumping out via an ip
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 12:01 -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> > That to one side, the default for a spam filter should not be to give
> > any weight to a white list unless the user modifies the config
> > themselves specifically. It can be seen
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 11:08 -0500, Charles Gregory wrote:
> All this debate about 'legitimate' mail services like 'returnpath'
> being abused by 'sneaky' spammers. How is that possible? There should be
> easy ways to prevent it. Here's a few ideas:
>
> As soon as any whitelist service like 'retur
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 10:50 -0500, Charles Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> > Qualifies what, that I get UBE that is Habeas Accredited? Should I start
> > with the 40 from 'DateTheuk' in the last 8 days?
>
> Okay, let's be
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 06:55 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> On 3-Dec-2009, at 23:06, R-Elists wrote:
> > certainly we understand your point here, yet what about accountability for
> > Return Path Inc (and other RPI companies) related rules in the default
> > Spamassassin configs?
>
>
> My position on HAB
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 11:28 +0100, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> > The correct answer will be precisely why this state of affairs exists.
>
> - because developers think/have thought its a good idea.
>
> - because nobody other than you makes such a noise about it. And YOU who
> are so against, hav
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 04:16 -0800, jdow wrote:
> From: "Yet Another Ninja"
> Sent: Friday, 2009/December/04 02:28
>
>
> > On 12/4/2009 10:57 AM, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> > > FINAL
> >> This is not a social club, it's a question and
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 00:18 -0800, jdow wrote:
> From: "LuKreme"
> Sent: Thursday, 2009/December/03 20:55
>
>
> > On Dec 3, 2009, at 13:43, "rich...@buzzhost.co.uk" > > wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 11:23 -0700, J.D. Falk wrote:
>
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 11:23 -0700, J.D. Falk wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 12:59 AM, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>
> > As for
> > insulting you - grow up. You work in the business of sending unwanted
> > junk email.
>
> You haven't done any research at all,
This is top of my list..
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Constant-Contact-Guide-email-Marketing/dp/0470503416/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1259777127&sr=8-1
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:06 -0700, J.D. Falk wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2009, at 12:38 PM, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>
> > So please, spare me the sob story about what a wonderful idea HABEAS is.
> > Talk is cheap, action speaks louder than words.
>
> Who's sobbing?
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 12:19 -0700, J.D. Falk wrote:
> On Nov 25, 2009, at 3:57 AM, Hajdú Zoltán wrote:
>
> > Then whos job? :) Habeas doesnt monitor Your Inbox.
> >
> > If You have the time to write here just for 'flaming' against a ~good
> > concept...
> > ...Maybe it would be a better idea to
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 12:06 -0500, Matt Garretson wrote:
> Chris Owen wrote:
> > Why anyone replies to this guy about anything is beyond me.
> > Adding him to a kill file doesn't do much good when you still
> > see the other half of the "argument".
>
>
> +1
>
> If you must feed the trolls, ple
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 10:08 -0500, Charles Gregory wrote:
> PS. If I were a spammer I would be laughing my ass off at this waste of
> time. Every effort spent on fighting each other is less spent on them.
Actually, it's reasonable to argue that you are worse - you've just
contributed to an argum
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 14:14 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > > > On 28.11.09 10:12, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> > The last time I checked no two email systems, be they home, soho or
> > enterprise, had to be the same. Unless, of course, you are now declari
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 13:57 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > On 28.11.09 10:12, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> > > > I got '5' for it, at a push...
> > > >
> > > > X-Spam-Report:
> > > > * 5.0 RELAYCOUNTRY_FR Rel
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 13:57 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> it's funny that you send me private copies for mail that DOES belong to
> the list, but you refuse private mail even if it's does NOT belong here.
>
Well, I figured if you wanted to go on being an ignorant asshole and
keep doing i
; >
> > > http://pastebin.com/m478c33ce
> > >
> > > Even after learning they still only score 3.6
> > >
> > > Anything I can do?
>
> On 28.11.09 10:12, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> > I got '5' for it, at a push...
> >
Matus forgot to include this one he sent to me personally:
> On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 14:03 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > Why do you tell me? Tell the OP, I just have used the same
> > terminology.
On 27.11.09 15:47, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> Matus, why are you
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 09:48 +, Arthur Dent wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have had a couple of these sail into my my inbox untouched by SA with
> the exception of RDNS_NONE and Bayes. Score of -0.1!
>
> http://pastebin.com/m478c33ce
>
> Even after learning they still only score 3.6
>
> Anything
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 17:17 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On fre 27 nov 2009 16:47:54 CET, "rich...@buzzhost.co.uk" wrote
> > Matus, why are you once more sending me off list replies?
> > Again, will you *please* keep your replies *ON LIST*.
>
> priceless reply-to
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 14:03 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Why do you tell me? Tell the OP, I just have used the same
> terminology.
Matus, why are you once more sending me off list replies?
Again, will you *please* keep your replies *ON LIST*. I pointed out that
RBL is trademark just to
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 12:27 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 26.11.09 17:12, Allen Chen wrote:
> > I didn't touch my spamassassin server for almost one year.
> > It's still running and filtering spam without any problems.
> > But I think things are changed a lot. I'm using 3.2.4.
> > So I
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 08:57 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 14:04 -0500, Alex wrote:
> >> > iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
> >>
> >> Nah, use REJECT so you get that immediate satisfactio
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 14:04 -0500, Alex wrote:
> > iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
>
> Nah, use REJECT so you get that immediate satisfaction :-)
>
> Alex
NO NO NO NO NO!
Drop has the effect of tarpitting them :-) As the Supremes sang;
"Set me free why don't you baby? You just k
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 19:20 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On ons 25 nov 2009 18:55:11 CET, "rich...@buzzhost.co.uk" wrote
> > Any more ranges most welcome :-)
>
> iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
>
Very good. That was nearly funny :-) Why don't
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 13:45 -0500, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm interested in people's opinion of UCEPROTECT. I'm aware of how it
> works, but even UCEPROTECT1 seems to catch an awful lot of ham, and I
> wondered if I was doing something wrong.
>
> I've set the score to 0.01 for now, while I watch a
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 17:34 +, Ned Slider wrote:
> Aaron Wolfe wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
> >> R-Elists wrote:
> >>>
> >>> on a much more important note, can those on the list that have a good
> >>> handle
> >>> on better filtering spam and/or UCE from Const
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 00:23 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> On 24-Nov-2009, at 15:23, Jeff Mincy wrote:
> > From: LuKreme
> >> On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:39, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> >
> >>> Yes, why to differ between non-abusing and abusing marketers...
> >
> >> We've been through this before. On m
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 09:17 +0100, Hajdú Zoltán wrote:
> Habeas (nowdays ReturnPath) certifies their clients, forces them to provide
> unsubscription options in their advertising messages, etc. If
> there wasnt any unsubscribe option then contact their support/abuse team.
> They list many import
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 17:08 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:39, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, why to differ between non-abusing and abusing marketers...
>
> We've been through this before. On my mail, habeas is a very strong
> indicator of spam. It does not appear
Thanks to Matus for the explanation, LuKreme for the suggestion on
scoring and Hajdu for the contact details. I am obliged to you and thank
you for your time.
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 14:17 -0500, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > What I'm looking to do is have SA look in these directories in addition
> > to the default locations. I don't have a problem putting rules there
> > Benny. I have a problem getting SA to look there for them :-)
>
> Are you talking about d
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 17:10 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> man sa-update
Thanks, but all that says is making use of:
--updatedir
Will allow rules to be downloaded to a different directory.
What I'm looking to do is have SA look in these directories in addition
to the default locations. I don't
I think this may have been answered before, but I can't find it in the
archives.
Custom rules can be kept in /etc/spamassassin/whateva.cf files no
problem. I would like to keep some rules separate for maintenance, by
keeping rules I write in /etc/spamassassin/custom/, and some that
friends write i
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 12:29 -0800, Mark Hedges wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Mark Hedges wrote:
> >
> > Hi. I've set up my own rbldnsd server. It's responding
> > to queries correctly, for example, I am trying to block
> > the server that this message comes from, 64.22.103.163.
> >
>
> I forgot
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:08 +0100, Ralph Bornefeld-Ettmann wrote:
> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk schrieb:
> > On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 00:07 +0100, Ralph Bornefeld-Ettmann wrote:
> >> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk schrieb:
> >>> Is anyone else seeing an influx
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:00 +, Justin Mason wrote:
> First -- my name is not Jim. Secondly -- I don't care what Spamhaus
> does, I'm asking what you suggest SpamAssassin do to measure FPs.
Is that a core feature of spamassassin Just in? Is it necessary to have
that data? Will 'Hey, I noticed
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 17:21 +1000, Res wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>
> >>>> safe. BRBL has a high hit rate as well, with a moderate safety rating.
>
> Wondered why i wasn't getting anything from mysql.com for over a week,
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 00:07 +0100, Ralph Bornefeld-Ettmann wrote:
> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk schrieb:
> > Is anyone else seeing an influx of spam with a zip attachment
> > balancechecker.zip?
> >
> > This contains a windows executable, balancechecker.exe, which appears t
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 20:34 +, Justin Mason wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 08:53, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 03:14 -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200910.mbox/%3c4ad11c44.
Is anyone else seeing an influx of spam with a zip attachment
balancechecker.zip?
This contains a windows executable, balancechecker.exe, which appears to
be testing clean with clam and others.
I'm inclined to think it's *not* clean and is viral.
EXAMPLE
http://pastebin.com/m730f90e9
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 03:14 -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200910.mbox/%3c4ad11c44.9030...@redhat.com%3e
> Compare this report to a similar report last month.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/NightlyMassCheck
> The results below are
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 11:40 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Am I the only one who thints that issues clearly off-topic should be sent
> off-list?
>
Your response was to correct an onlist reply to an onlist remark. Is
there some reason why you would feel it appropriate to off-list that?
AF
> > > > put it online. He still got hacked again at least once after that.
> > > >
> > > > I also heard stories of my son doing battle with hackers who had gotten
> > > >
> > > > into his Linux system.
>
> On 13.11.09 08:38,
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 09:12 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 12.11.09 13:55, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
> > I don't know about Linux viruses; BUT, I do remember less than ten years
> > ago when it was virtually impossible to build a Linux box with a hot
> > online connection, because you w
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 11:45 -0500, Alex wrote:
> >> imho Ralf have never being banned in maillist here, if you dont like
> >> his answers just unsubscribe
> >>
> > Trotting out useless, pointless, tardy, curt, terse replies benefit
> > nobody at all and makes the poster look arrogant especially whe
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 16:50 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On tir 10 nov 2009 15:26:43 CET, "rich...@buzzhost.co.uk" wrote
> > Please keep this in your mind in future before trotting out that tired
> > old gas.
>
> imho Ralf have never being banned in maillist
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 14:32 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * rahlqu...@gmail.com :
> > Ok regex is not my strong suit by any means. Trying to get a match for email
> > addresses that start with a pipe character ( about 15% of my spam is this ).
>
> That's not needed. Why are you accepting mail t
1 - 100 of 341 matches
Mail list logo
