On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 12:01 -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote: > rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: > > That to one side, the default for a spam filter should not be to give > > any weight to a white list unless the user modifies the config > > themselves specifically. It can be seen to be suspicious and offering a > > pecuniary advantage to those involved and using it. > > > > I disagree. I think a spam filter should do it's best to give a > reasonable weight to both whitelists and blacklists.
In which case how about including several other whitelists and not just giving advantage to one?
