On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 17:08 -0700, LuKreme wrote: > On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:39, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> > wrote: > > > Yes, why to differ between non-abusing and abusing marketers... > > We've been through this before. On my mail, habeas is a very strong > indicator of spam. It does not appear in legitimate mail. > > I don't know who these legitimate marketers are, but I don't feel I'm > missing anything. > AMEN TO THAT! The only person(s) who should be deciding what is or what is not unwanted commercial email, is the recipient. Any commercial 'whitelist' is by design, an utter travesty of an idea.
I can see the IP's of Return Path getting adding to my IP Tables drop list. They can join Constant Contact, Dot Mailer, IHM and 'The Planet'.
