On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 14:32 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * rahlqu...@gmail.com <rahlqu...@gmail.com>: > > Ok regex is not my strong suit by any means. Trying to get a match for email > > addresses that start with a pipe character ( about 15% of my spam is this ). > > That's not needed. Why are you accepting mail to NON-EXISTING > recipients at all? > Ralf, may I ask, do you predictably trot this offensive answer out all the time for fun, or just because you are bored?
FYI, the last time I looked it was not a criminal offence to use a catch all, unless the law is different in Germany? I make heavy use of catchalls for spam tracking using 'balloon race' and watermarking. I may, however, wish to skew and filter some combinations despite running catch all. Please keep this in your mind in future before trotting out that tired old gas.
