On 2014-08-07 16:58, Andy wrote:
As for me going elsewhere, I think my best option at this point is to just
go back to the "old" way of using my own client software on my computer.
And find one with a strong filter of its own. Anyone have any good results
with Firefox Thunderbird?
Thunderbird h
> I looked at Lunarpages and what control you have over SA. I can only see
> that you can change the score and populate a whitelist and blacklist. I
> maybe wrong (I don't think I am) but that is nowhere near enough
> administrative control to make an impact on changing SA's behaviour. I
> don't s
On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 17:14 +0100, emailitis.com wrote:
> I have had a fair number of VERY similar Spam emails that are all
> about comparing prices. I have put a number in a pastebin below.
We need full, raw samples. Those are mostly just headers with the raw
body missing (multipart/alternative,
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 17:14:55 +0100
emailitis.com wrote:
> I have had a fair number of VERY similar Spam emails that are all
> about comparing prices. I have put a number in a pastebin below.
> They all seem to be originating from Fasthosts in UK which I cannot
> really blacklist in entirety.
>
>
Andy wrote
> I am writing this rather long message in hopes that I might get at least
> one
> cogent response to a very nagging problem and situation that involved
> Spam Assassin.
>
>
> I have asked repeatedly for a reason why two near duplicate pieces of
> spam, coming in at the same time, one
--On Thursday, August 07, 2014 10:37 AM -0400 "James B. Byrne"
wrote:
On Wed, August 6, 2014 17:30, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, August 06, 2014 6:24 PM -0400 "James B. Byrne"
wrote:
I am constrained to run the version provided by the upstream distro
packager (RedHat). When
On Thu, August 7, 2014 15:53, Bob Proulx wrote:
> James B. Byrne wrote:
>> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>> > Policies such as this show a complete lack of understanding on how to run
>> > production infrastructure. RH will never update SA in RHEL6 to any new
>> > release. Your best course of actio
James B. Byrne wrote:
> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> > Policies such as this show a complete lack of understanding on how to run
> > production infrastructure. RH will never update SA in RHEL6 to any new
> > release. Your best course of action is to fix your broken policy. Failing
> > that, you
On 08/07/2014 07:28 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Aug 7, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Axb wrote:
On 08/07/2014 07:06 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Aug 7, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Axb wrote:
On 08/07/2014 06:55 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Aug 6, 2014, at 11:20 PM, Axb
wrote:
On 08/07/2014
On Aug 7, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
>
> Okay, I thought you were saying that the posted configuration would block the
> entire CIDR range. It won’t.
>
> So they have a lot of VirtualHost definitions: a couple of comments on that.
>
> (1) putting that many domains on a si
On Aug 7, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
> (1) putting that many domains on a single host is just begging for that host
> to have a catastrophic failure (as opposed to putting that many domains on a
> local (re)director which servers as a proxy, a la mod_proxy_html mode…)
Judgi
On Aug 7, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Axb wrote:
> On 08/07/2014 07:06 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 7, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Axb wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/07/2014 06:55 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Aug 6, 2014, at 11:20 PM, Axb wrote:
> On 08/07/2014 07:01 AM, Philip Pri
On Aug 7, 2014, at 11:13 AM, emailitis.com wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Philip Prindeville [mailto:philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com]
>> Sent: 07 August 2014 06:01
>> To: Paul Stead
>> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: rule for repeated tracking numbers
>>
>>
On 08/07/2014 07:06 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Aug 7, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Axb wrote:
On 08/07/2014 06:55 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Aug 6, 2014, at 11:20 PM, Axb wrote:
On 08/07/2014 07:01 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Aug 6, 2014, at 1:23 PM, Paul Stead wrote:
On 06/
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Prindeville [mailto:philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com]
> Sent: 07 August 2014 06:01
> To: Paul Stead
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: rule for repeated tracking numbers
>
>
> On Aug 6, 2014, at 1:23 PM, Paul Stead
wrote:
>
> Uh. the
i wouldnt know what to do with it. and have no time or desire to learn
about it.
i think you might have accidentally put your finger on the problem ive
been having with them. i think maybe they seem to expect that most their
customers have dedicated IT departments that can deal with something lik
On Aug 7, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Axb wrote:
> On 08/07/2014 06:55 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 6, 2014, at 11:20 PM, Axb wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/07/2014 07:01 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Aug 6, 2014, at 1:23 PM, Paul Stead
wrote:
>
> On 06/08/14 20:
On 8/7/2014 12:56 PM, Andy wrote:
On Thu, August 7, 2014 9:38 am, Andy Balholm wrote:
Looking at Lunarpages pricing page, it looks like shell access is a $2.00
per month add-on. Since you don’t know what it is, I expect you didn’t
think it was worth paying extra for it, so you probably don’t ha
On 08/07/2014 06:55 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Aug 6, 2014, at 11:20 PM, Axb wrote:
On 08/07/2014 07:01 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Aug 6, 2014, at 1:23 PM, Paul Stead wrote:
On 06/08/14 20:00, John Hardin wrote:
Can some fresh samples be posted to pastebin?
http://pastebi
uri_block_cidr will still defeat this, at least until he’s forced to switch
hosting providers.
On Aug 7, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Andy Balholm wrote:
> This particular spammer just re-did the format of their emails, probably to
> get around the rules that we’re working on. Do they read the
> spama
On Thu, August 7, 2014 9:38 am, Andy Balholm wrote:
> Looking at Lunarpages pricing page, it looks like shell access is a $2.00
> per month add-on. Since you dont know what it is, I expect you didnt
> think it was worth paying extra for it, so you probably dont have it.
i wouldnt know what to
On Aug 6, 2014, at 11:20 PM, Axb wrote:
> On 08/07/2014 07:01 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 6, 2014, at 1:23 PM, Paul Stead wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 06/08/14 20:00, John Hardin wrote:
Can some fresh samples be posted to pastebin?
>>> http://pastebin.com/yHiT2s3t
>>> http:
This particular spammer just re-did the format of their emails, probably to get
around the rules that we’re working on. Do they read the spamassassin-users
list? (I can tell it’s the same spammer, since the return address in Dundrum,
Ireland, is the same as some of the earlier ones, and the styl
On Aug 7, 2014, at 9:30 AM, Andy wrote:
> I have no idea whether I have shell access. I don't even know what that
> is. Sorry.
Shell access means being able to log into their server and get a command
prompt, so that you can do configuration that isn’t supported by their control
panel.
Lookin
I've asked them. But I am not going to expect they will move on it all
that quickly if at all. It's been quite a battle in even getting them to
admit there is a problem.
I have no idea whether I have shell access. I don't even know what that
is. Sorry.
But thank you for this much anyway. Maybe it
On 8/7/2014 12:05 PM, Andy wrote:
As requested, here are 5 long headers, just taken at random. I can provide
more if needed.
http://pastebin.com/g86GFGwp
None of these have any detail on the SA scores. Ask Lunarpages to add
this line to the local.cf or user_prefs file:
add_header all Repor
I have had a fair number of VERY similar Spam emails that are all about
comparing prices. I have put a number in a pastebin below. They all seem
to be originating from Fasthosts in UK which I cannot really blacklist in
entirety.
Can anyone suggest how to block it with a Spamassassin rule?
As requested, here are 5 long headers, just taken at random. I can provide
more if needed.
http://pastebin.com/g86GFGwp
and to Bowie, as for raising the score from 2.5 to 5, believe me when I
say I've tried all different settings. The 2.5 was advised to me by
someone who was a senior tech in the
On 08/07/2014 03:16 PM, Andy wrote:
I would appreciate any insights anyone can offer to me, or for that matter
to Lunarpages because I'm not clear that even they understand what is
going on, nor how to fix this very nagging problem.
to make a long story short..
SpamAssassin is a framework and r
Please keep the discussion on the list so that everyone can participate.
On 8/7/2014 11:16 AM, Andy wrote:
thank you for this, although I can't really understand most of any of it.
I will pass it over to Lunarpages tech and see what they have to say.
I have no administrative control whatsoever.
On 8/7/14, 9:37 AM, "James B. Byrne" wrote:
>Which explains, of course, why Linux distributions belonging to the
>RedHAt/CentOs/ScientificLinux/RHOS/ClearOS family are so lacking in
>popularity
>and so seldom found in corporate environments.
Those distros are popular because corporate environmen
On 8/7/2014 9:16 AM, Andy wrote:
I have now had three different rounds of complaints/discussions with their
tech support about it, (January, May and this past July). During that time
the server was rebooted, or my website rebooted, my server changed (just
within the past couple of weeks), the fil
On Wed, August 6, 2014 17:30, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, August 06, 2014 6:24 PM -0400 "James B. Byrne"
> wrote:
>
>> I am constrained to run the version provided by the upstream distro
>> packager (RedHat). When they update SA then, and only then, will I get
>> the upgrade.
>
I am writing this rather long message in hopes that I might get at least one
cogent response to a very nagging problem and situation that involved
Spam Assassin.
I run a very small toy company, number of employees: 1, and have a website,
www.opticaltoys.com that has been hosted by Lunarpages since
34 matches
Mail list logo
