I am writing this rather long message in hopes that I might get at least one
cogent response to a very nagging problem and situation that involved
Spam Assassin.

I run a very small toy company, number of employees: 1, and have a website,
www.opticaltoys.com that has been hosted by Lunarpages since around 2008.
That hosting has been perfect fine and capable with a very ready, helpful
and knowledgeable staff of tech support. That is to say I've had no
problems
with them, or spam, whatsoever until January of this year, when I started
getting an inordinate amount of spam in my Inbox. For better or worse,
I've come to rely on using webmail (through which Lunarpages supplies
SpamAssassin) over a software on my own computer.

I have now had three different rounds of complaints/discussions with their
tech support about it, (January, May and this past July). During that time
the server was rebooted, or my website rebooted, my server changed (just
within the past couple of weeks), the filtering score lowered (now at
2.5). None of these things ever had any noticeable effect, but
occasionaly, seemingly without any changes made, the spam to the Inbox
would decrease to just 1 or a few a day. But the average per day going
into the Inbox is between 20 and 30 pieces of spam.

Despite the various attempts at fixing the problem by the tech staff and
admins at Lunarpages, there has been a repeated "party line" if you will -
that they are not responsible for the software, it being both free and
common source, and that I am free to read up on it. I have gotten
contradictory viewpoints as to the efficacy of Spam Assassin: first being
told that if I wanted a better filtering system I could upgrade, by
payment, to "MX", as well as being told as late as last week that Spam
Assassin is a "superior" filtering software.

The latest attempt to fix the problem was in the middle of July when they
migrated my whole account to a different server, telling me that different
servers "learn" spam in different ways, and that changing it could help
matters. Naive as I was, I thought it meant a complete fix. The migration
was done, and I waited the allowed time of 24 to 48 hours for its
completion. When I was still getting upwards of 30 spam a day in my Inbox
I let them know, only to be told that the server had to "learn" more. And
that has become the biggest question. (I am also told that I don't have
"dkim" on but I have no idea what it is, or where the switch is.)

I have asked repeatedly for a reason why two near duplicate pieces of
spam, coming in at the same time, one went into the Spam folder, and the
other went into the Inbox.

This email should not be seen as a complaint about Spam Assassin. Rather
I'm simply at a complete loss. All the relevant questions I ask of the
tech support at Lunarpages, either go unanswered or are skirted around.
For instance a number times, including today, it is pointed out that
because my email "a...@opticaltoys.com" is in plain text on my old html
site, as well as other sites, it is harvestable and therefore easy
spammed. But I have three other emails, all managed by gmail, that are
"out there" in text as well and I don't have the problem with spam coming
into my Inbox like I do with my Lunarpages account.

I have been told that Spam Assassin "learns" what is spam over time. But
when I ask the support staff just how that occurs, I get no answer. When I
point out that there is no mechanism, such as with Gmail, to "report"
something as Spam with a mere click, I get no reply. I am at a loss to
understand how Spam Assasin is learning anything. All the spam that is
coming in, either to the Inbox or Spam folder, are very similar in style,
some of them as I said identical, and many of them selling the same
product. But while one goes to the Inbox, another goes to the Spam folder
without my understanding why. (Yes, technically the scores are such that
would say "this is not spam" but the amount of such spam that Spam Assasin
is calling "not spam" is, in my opinion, inordinately high - equal to or
greater per day than what is getting called "spam".

I would appreciate any insights anyone can offer to me, or for that matter
to Lunarpages because I'm not clear that even they understand what is
going on, nor how to fix this very nagging problem.

Sincerely,
Andy

Reply via email to