[Bug 1950917] [NEW] Reporting a gimp crash

2021-11-14 Thread Tom Rodger
Public bug reported: ``` The "Gimp" crash happened when try to apply the oilify filter to an image layer. I had tried to apply it to the top layer. It was not turned on. So I turned the layer on and then used from the Gimp menu "re-apply" oilify filter. Since it was never applied in the first p

[Bug 1103044] Re: outdated version of nodejs (ubuntu 12.04 / 12.10 / 13.04 / 14.04 /14.10/15.04)

2015-09-08 Thread Rodger Combs
Latest stable node.js is now 4.0.0 (with the version bump coming as a result of the merge with io.js). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103044 Title: outdated version of nodejs (ubuntu

Re: [Bug 1081590] Re: could not determine source package name

2014-11-13 Thread rodger spooncer
d replaced it with HP printer M125nw which worked 'straight out of the box' My problem has now gone away. Regards Rodger -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081590 Title:

[Bug 1376331] [NEW] Current package is not thread-safe

2014-10-01 Thread Rodger Combs
Public bug reported: The current fribidi release (fribidi-0.19.6) is not thread-safe unless configured with `--enable-malloc`. This can cause crashes when using fribidi in multiple libraries concurrently. This option is removed, and thread-safe allocation enabled by default, in this commit: ht

[Bug 1081590] [NEW] could not determine source package name

2012-11-21 Thread rodger spooncer
a problem in 10.04 Regards Rodger ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081590 Title: could not determine source packag

[Bug 590681] Re: EXT4 Files corruption

2012-09-09 Thread RodGer
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590681 Title: EXT4 Files corruption To manage notifications about this bug go to: htt

[Bug 460743] Re: Cambridge Silicon Radio Bluetooth Dongles do not work

2012-08-15 Thread Rodger Fox
I tried these dongles on two PCs running 12.04 and they actually cause the systems to freeze, so that I have to reboot with the power button. They seem to work when I plug them in, but I try to pair them with PS3 controllers using sixad and then the system freezes. This was repeated many times thro

[Bug 1000717] Re: PCI/internal sound card not detected

2012-05-17 Thread Rodger Dowling
Not a bug, it worked before. ** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Converted to question: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+question/197596 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 1000717] Re: PCI/internal sound card not detected

2012-05-17 Thread Rodger Dowling
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000717 Title: PCI/internal sound card not detected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/

[Bug 1000717] [NEW] PCI/internal sound card not detected

2012-05-17 Thread Rodger Dowling
Public bug reported: Asus m2n32sli deluxe motherboard. tried update of BIOS. checked bios and all settings good. Had sound before, it just quit yesterday for unknown reason. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: alsa-base 1.0.24+dfsg-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-

[Bug 807158] Re: Install Nvidia-96 drivers failed

2012-03-15 Thread Rodger Fox
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 941325 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941325 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 941325 nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 fail to install in precise pangolin (due to unmet dependency xorg-video-abi-10) -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 941325] Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 fail to install in precise pangolin (due to unmet dependency xorg-video-abi-10)

2012-03-15 Thread Rodger Fox
** Also affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941325 Title: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 fail to install

[Bug 941325] Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 fail to install in precise pangolin (due to unmet dependency xorg-video-abi-10)

2012-03-15 Thread Rodger Fox
** Summary changed: - nvidia-96 fails to install in precise pangolin (due to unmet dependency xorg-video-abi-10) + nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 fail to install in precise pangolin (due to unmet dependency xorg-video-abi-10) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 941325] Re: nvidia-96 fails to install in precise pangolin (due to unmet dependency xorg-video-abi-10)

2012-03-09 Thread Rodger Fox
I'm not sure how virtual packages work, but I think this may actually be a problem with the new "xserver-xorg-core" package. When trying to install xorg-video-abi-10, I get this: Package xorg-video-abi-10 is a virtual package provided by: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.10.4-1ubuntu4.1 [Not candidate ver

[Bug 941325] Re: nvidia-96 fails to install in precise pangolin (due to unmet dependency xorg-video-abi-10)

2012-03-04 Thread Rodger Fox
I am getting this bug with nvidia-173 also. No drivers show up in the "Additional Drivers" app, and I get the same error message from this bug if I try to install the driver package using apt or software center. "Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable" The drivers worked fine before

Re: [Bug 750756] Re: gwibber-accounts crashed with SIGSEGV in g_markup_escape_text()

2011-05-20 Thread Rodger M. L. Rocha
Not anymore, Thanks =) On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Kamus wrote: > Roger, are you still being affected by this behaviour with latest > release of gwibber included in Ubuntu Natty? > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > https://bugs.lau

[Bug 784333] Re: package flashplugin-installer 10.3.181.14ubuntu0.11.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 1

2011-05-17 Thread Rodger M. L. Rocha
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784333 Title: package flashplugin-installer 10.3.181.14ubuntu0.11.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado ret

[Bug 784333] [NEW] package flashplugin-installer 10.3.181.14ubuntu0.11.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 1

2011-05-17 Thread Rodger M. L. Rocha
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree i was upgrading flash plugin using #apt-get upgrade when this happened ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: flashplugin-installer 10.3.181.14ubuntu0.11.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.

Re: [Bug 313201] Re: system hung when synchronising foxmarks and trying applications browser

2010-01-10 Thread Rodger Harris
the options, but no installation occurs. I tried this on two PCs with the same result. I used 8.10 and it works fine at this point. Rodger Harris +44 (0) 77 89 00 82 92 2010/1/10 Rodger Harris > Hello, > > I upgraded to version 9 and I have not had this bug since. > > Thanks. >

Re: [Bug 313201] Re: system hung when synchronising foxmarks and trying applications browser

2010-01-10 Thread Rodger Harris
Hello, I upgraded to version 9 and I have not had this bug since. Thanks. Rodger Harris +44 (0) 77 89 00 82 92 2010/1/10 David Tombs > Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make > Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been >

[Bug 449762] modified.conffile..etc.pulse.daemon.conf.txt

2010-01-02 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "modified.conffile..etc.pulse.daemon.conf.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37361933/modified.conffile..etc.pulse.daemon.conf.txt ** Tags added: apport-collected -- No sound with intel-hda without "alsa force-reload" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449762 You received

[Bug 449762] XsessionErrors.txt

2010-01-02 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37361932/XsessionErrors.txt -- No sound with intel-hda without "alsa force-reload" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 449762] PciMultimedia.txt

2010-01-02 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37361931/PciMultimedia.txt -- No sound with intel-hda without "alsa force-reload" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 449762] Dependencies.txt

2010-01-02 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37361930/Dependencies.txt -- No sound with intel-hda without "alsa force-reload" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 449762] CurrentDmesg.txt

2010-01-02 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37361929/CurrentDmesg.txt -- No sound with intel-hda without "alsa force-reload" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 449762] Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt

2010-01-02 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37361928/Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt -- No sound with intel-hda without "alsa force-reload" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is su

[Bug 449762] Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt

2010-01-02 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37361926/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt -- No sound with intel-hda without "alsa force-reload" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is su

[Bug 449762] Card0.Amixer.values.txt

2010-01-02 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "Card0.Amixer.values.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37361924/Card0.Amixer.values.txt -- No sound with intel-hda without "alsa force-reload" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 449762] BootDmesg.txt

2010-01-02 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37361923/BootDmesg.txt -- No sound with intel-hda without "alsa force-reload" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -

[Bug 449762] ArecordDevices.txt

2010-01-02 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "ArecordDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37361922/ArecordDevices.txt -- No sound with intel-hda without "alsa force-reload" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 449762] AplayDevices.txt

2010-01-02 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37361920/AplayDevices.txt -- No sound with intel-hda without "alsa force-reload" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 449762] AlsaDevices.txt

2010-01-02 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37361919/AlsaDevices.txt -- No sound with intel-hda without "alsa force-reload" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 449762] apport-collect data

2010-01-02 Thread RodGer
Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: rodger 1833 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: rodger 1833 F...m pulseaudio Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xf120 irq 22' Mixer name

[Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] [ubuntu 9.10] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled

2009-12-29 Thread RodGer
I have more serious problems with this driver. I doesn't let me boot Ubuntu 9.10 when enabled. I had to disable it using a live cd to boot. I found that there is an error message when you install the package named 'fglrx-kernel-source' Here is the terminal output containing the error: Selecting

[Bug 449272] Re: [compiz] applets with Dock type window leave shadow

2009-12-23 Thread RodGer
Sorry for my mistakes in the previous comment. Here it is corrected: Indeed, it affects the drawer applet too. When you close the drawer the shadow remains until you click on the desktop. The main problem is solved but not totally. Also, the test case, Travis Watkins posted, still gives the same

[Bug 449272] Re: [compiz] applets with Dock type window leave shadow

2009-12-23 Thread RodGer
Indeed, it affects the drawer applet to. When you close the drawer the shadow remains remains until I click on the desktop. The main problem is solved but not totally. Also, the test case, Travis Watkins posted, still gives the same result: the little window lives a shadow that won't go away no mat

[Bug 439448] Re: notification area shows wrong icons. erratic behaviour

2009-12-21 Thread RodGer
------ + EDIT (RodGer): + I'm adding the description from the report I've done for a similar problem on my system which is not a 64 bit system. I also marked my report as duplicate (bug #484547) + + ProblemType: Bug + Architecture: i386 + Date: Wed Nov 18 01:04:5

[Bug 484537] Re: Double sound icon and/or missing network manager icon and/or empty spot in the notification area.[Ubuntu 9.10]

2009-12-21 Thread RodGer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 439448 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439448 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 439448 notification area shows wrong icons. erratic behaviour -- Double sound icon and/or missing network manager icon and/or empty spot in the notification

[Bug 318286] Re: Network manager forgets WPA Personal hidden network

2009-12-16 Thread RodGer
I have Ubuntu 9.10 and I experience the same problem. When I reboot it works fine but sometimes it disconnects with no obvious reason and then it asks for a password. Sometimes I choose to right click-> disconnect and then connect again but this doesn't always work. Maybe later I'll provide some mo

[Bug 484850] Re: gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-12-10 Thread RodGer
It seems that it was an issue with all the dock type windows that hide (invisible dock windows) and it got fixed. This bug was fixed in the package compiz - 1:0.8.4-0ubuntu9 --- compiz (1:0.8.4-0ubuntu9) lucid; urgency=low [ Michael Vogt ] * 061_KWD_stubs.patch: updated to b

[Bug 489114] Re: Side (vertical) gnome-panels won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10](compiz related)

2009-11-28 Thread RodGer
Why is it a NEW feature? What changed since Ubuntu 8.04. It is a broken OLD feature. Didn't you saw the video? You should not insist that this won't get fixed deciding this by yourself. You should let the community decide. Leave it open for some time until more community members have the opportuni

[Bug 387370] Re: compiz reflection plugin has some visual error

2009-11-28 Thread RodGer
Shouldn't this be set to Status= In progress since it is assigned to somebody? or at least triaged since the importance is decided to be low? -- compiz reflection plugin has some visual error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387370 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 426417] Re: broken menus at Ubuntu Linux 9.04/9.10 with intel-2.8.1/2.9

2009-11-27 Thread RodGer
Can you (somebody who has the problem described) please upload a screenshot of the settings windows (not just the menus). I have a problem which I'm not sure if it is the same. My menus are ok, no problem. But I have problem with every window that can open inside stellarium. Please check the scr

[Bug 484593] Re: [stellarium] All settings-configuration (location, date..) and help windows distorted.

2009-11-27 Thread RodGer
** Summary changed: - [stellarium] All menus (location, date, help...) distorted. + [stellarium] All settings-configuration (location, date..) and help windows distorted. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: stellarium Just check the screen shot. I can't use the program as I can'

[Bug 489114] Re: Side (vertical) gnome-panels won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10](compiz related)

2009-11-27 Thread RodGer
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Confirmed -- Side (vertical) gnome-panels won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10](compiz related) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489114 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 489114] Re: Side (vertical) gnome-panels won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10](compiz related)

2009-11-27 Thread RodGer
Thanks for taking the time to triage the bug Travis. BUT. As you can see here: https://wiki.edubuntu.org/BugSquad/KnowledgeBase/Classes/Triaging -- -- A Wishlist

[Bug 489114] Re: Side (vertical) gnome-panel won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10](compiz related)

2009-11-27 Thread RodGer
In the video titled "THE-EXPECTED-BEHAVIOR(8.04)" you can see the normally expected behavior as it really was using Hardy Heron. The two features, normally, are not incompatible. ** Attachment added: "In the video titled "THE-EXPECTED-BEHAVIOR(8.04)" you can see the normally expected behavior as

[Bug 489114] Re: Side (vertical) gnome-panel won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10](compiz related)

2009-11-27 Thread RodGer
** Attachment removed: "gnome-panel_bug.ogv" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36145475/gnome-panel_bug.ogv -- Side (vertical) gnome-panel won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10](compiz related) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489114 You received this bug notification b

[Bug 489114] Re: Side (vertical) gnome-panel won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10](compiz related)

2009-11-27 Thread RodGer
** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-panel - -You should be able to make an auto hidden panel show up when you mouse over the edge of the hidden panel. + -You should be able to make an auto hidden panel show up when you mouse over the edge of the hidden panel. -Instead of t

[Bug 489114] Re: Side (vertical) gnome-panel won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10](compiz related)

2009-11-27 Thread RodGer
The problem is related with the compiz feature 'rotate cube' and maybe other similar features that move you around multiple desktops e.g. desktop wall etc. As you can see in the video attached (gnome- panel+compiz_bug.ogv) it doesn't matter if you have enabled or not individual options like "Edge F

[Bug 489114] Re: Side (vertical) gnome-panel won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10](compiz related)

2009-11-27 Thread RodGer
** Also affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Side (vertical) gnome-panel won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10](compiz related) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489114 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 489114] Re: Side (vertical) gnome-panel won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10](compiz related)

2009-11-27 Thread RodGer
** Package changed: compiz (Ubuntu) => gnome-panel (Ubuntu) -- Side (vertical) gnome-panel won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10](compiz related) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489114 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 489114] Re: Side (vertical) gnome-panel won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10](compiz related)

2009-11-27 Thread RodGer
** Summary changed: - Side (vertical) gnome-panel won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10] + Side (vertical) gnome-panel won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10](compiz related) ** Package changed: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) => compiz (Ubuntu) --

[Bug 489114] Re: Side (vertical) gnome-panel won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10]

2009-11-27 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "gnome-panel_bug.ogv" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36145475/gnome-panel_bug.ogv ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36145476/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "GConfNonDefault.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36145477/GConfNo

[Bug 489114] [NEW] Side (vertical) gnome-panel won't show up on mouse over, if selected to autohide.[ubuntu 9.10]

2009-11-27 Thread RodGer
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel -You should be able to make an auto hidden panel show up when you mouse over the edge of the hidden panel. -Instead of the above described behavior which can be observed with the bottom and the top panel, a right and/or the left panel stays

[Bug 434921] Re: nautilus is crashing and restart by gnome-session

2009-11-26 Thread RodGer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 488699 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488699 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 488699 Nautilus fails to start with segmentation fault.[Ubuntu - 9.10] -- nautilus is crashing and restart by gnome-session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/4

[Bug 485062] Re: Segmentation fault running nautilus under Karmic

2009-11-26 Thread RodGer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 488699 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488699 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 488699 Nautilus fails to start with segmentation fault.[Ubuntu - 9.10] -- Segmentation fault running nautilus under Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48

[Bug 488699] Re: Nautilus fails to start with segmentation fault.

2009-11-26 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36108739/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36108740/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: "usr_lib_nautilus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36108741/usr_lib_

[Bug 488699] [NEW] Nautilus fails to start with segmentation fault.[Ubuntu - 9.10]

2009-11-26 Thread RodGer
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus It happens from time to time but after rebooting the problem is gone. Since now I just couldn't start nautilus sometimes and I just rebooted hoping that it will be ok. This time I tried to call nautilus using the terminal to see if any error m

[Bug 76901] Re: right Alt key not recognized by default (lv3:ralt_switch shouldn't be set by default for US keyboard layouts)

2009-11-25 Thread RodGer
I don't know if it's the same problem but I can't use the right alt key to change layout from Greek to English although I can do the opposite. Regarding the fact that some don't confirm any relevant problem, it may be because it's a hardware specific problem or even a problem depending on the de

[Bug 76901] Re: right Alt key not recognized by default (lv3:ralt_switch shouldn't be set by default for US keyboard layouts)

2009-11-25 Thread RodGer
oops!!! Didn't noticed it's a very old bug. Maybe i should file a new bug report. -- right Alt key not recognized by default (lv3:ralt_switch shouldn't be set by default for US keyboard layouts) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/76901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 487096] Re: package linux-image-2.6.31-15-generic 2.6.31-15.50 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-11-24 Thread RodGer
I don't think you should upgrade grub. At least not yet. As I can see from your menu.lst file there is no entry for the previous kernel (2.6.31-14). Is this because you manually edited the file? What is the content of your '/boot' directory? Although I don't underestimate the error's significance,

[Bug 487687] Re: Can't start nautilus after reboot + can't access a permanentlly mounted ext3 partition

2009-11-24 Thread RodGer
Fortunately just rebooting, solved the problem. Since I don't give enough information to reproduce the problem, I'll change the status to incomplete and if somebody gets here with the same problem and some more info, please make sure you did the needed modifications. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubunt

[Bug 487687] Re: Can't start nautilus after reboot + can't access a permanentlly mounted ext3 partition

2009-11-24 Thread RodGer
t says "Opening rodger" but when this dissappeares, nothing happens... - Also, it seems like an ext3 partition that I have, is inaccessible and that is the reason for having the two "lost" icons on my up panel where I have two applications whose icons are located in the partiti

[Bug 487687] Re: Can't start nautilus after reboot + can't access a permanentlly mounted ext3 partition

2009-11-24 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "all-fucked-up.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36027049/all-fucked-up.png ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36027050/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36027051/XsessionErro

[Bug 487687] [NEW] Can't start nautilus after reboot + can't access a permanentlly mounted ext3 partition

2009-11-24 Thread RodGer
my normal boot directory which is on an other partition. After all these I rebooted my system and after loging in I saw what you can see in the screenshot attached. When I try to open my home folder, there is a little indicator on my palel (like a minimized window) where it says "Opening r

[Bug 449272] Re: [compiz] applets with Dock type window leave shadow

2009-11-24 Thread RodGer
Gnome panel is also a dock type window that is hidden (use show hide buttons or auto-hide) but it has no problem. Is there any other (than invest and dictionary applet) example of a dock type window that is hidden rather than destroyed? Sorry but I'm learning.How can you see if a dock type window

[Bug 449272] Re: [compiz] Invest applet drop down leaves a shadow on desktop

2009-11-24 Thread RodGer
I also confirmed that this bug affects me too. Ah! and a little correction of my comment above: "Bravo for helping ++improve++the..." -- [compiz] Invest applet drop down leaves a shadow on desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449272 You received this bug notification because you are a me

[Bug 484850] Re: gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-11-24 Thread RodGer
@ Sander Jonkers: There is not a general bug for every dock type window. Gnome panel as also the clock applet are dock type windows but there is not such problem. Please read my previous comment and you'll understand why we are talking about TWO DIFFERENT BUGS. Check also the following: https:/

[Bug 449272] Re: [compiz] Invest applet drop down leaves a shadow on desktop

2009-11-24 Thread RodGer
** Summary changed: - [compiz] applets with Dock type window leave shadow + [compiz] Invest applet drop down leaves a shadow on desktop -- [compiz] Invest applet drop down leaves a shadow on desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449272 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 449272] Re: [compiz] applets with Dock type window leave shadow

2009-11-24 Thread RodGer
Hello everybody. Bravo for helping the software we all freely share. That's ubuntu spirit. I think that this certain bug report is more generalized than it should be. I'll explain myself right away. The problem does not affect every window which is type=Dock. For example the clock applet as also t

[Bug 474621] Re: gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stay on desktop

2009-11-24 Thread RodGer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 484850 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484850 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 449272 [compiz] applets with Dock type window leave shadow ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 484850 gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's

[Bug 484850] Re: gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-11-24 Thread RodGer
oddvar: I'm happy this worked for you. I did not edited any configuration text though. I think that you didn't use the ADVANCED CompizConfig Settings Manager. If you have it installed it must be under System->Preferences->CompizConfig Settings Manager.Open the software center and write compizconf

[Bug 484850] Re: gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-11-23 Thread RodGer
** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-utils Every time I use the dictionary applet and then close the little window containing the word definition, a frame shadow remains on the desktop. The shadow is only on the desktop and not on any window overlapping the certain area.

[Bug 484850] Re: gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-11-23 Thread RodGer
We have to make clear if the bug affects compiz or gnome-utils or both. A similar bug with the clock applet which has a fix released was filed as a compiz bug. How can we check in which packet the problem is? ** Also affects: compiz Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-dictionary

[Bug 428783] Re: shadow remains on desktop after closing clock applet window

2009-11-23 Thread RodGer
Here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-utils/+bug/484850 is a similar problem with the gnome-dictionary-applet. Can somebody help to track which is the problematic package? Is it compiz? Why? In the clock applet window, how did you know that the problem is with compiz and not with

[Bug 484850] Re: gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-11-23 Thread RodGer
** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-utils Every time I use the dictionary applet and then close the little window containing the word definition, a frame shadow remains on the desktop. The shadow is only on the desktop and not on any window overlapping the certain area.

[Bug 484850] Re: gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-11-23 Thread RodGer
** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-utils Every time I use the dictionary applet and then close the little window containing the word definition, a frame shadow remains on the desktop. The shadow is only on the desktop and not on any window overlapping the certain area.

[Bug 484850] Re: gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-11-23 Thread RodGer
Well. I think I found something. As I suggested above, I made some tests with compiz options. At some point I tried to disable window decoration (without disabling compiz) but whatever I tried the little square was ticked (is this another bug?). So, I tried changing the settings regarding window

[Bug 484850] Re: gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-11-23 Thread RodGer
What Sander Jonkers said, shows that maybe the bug is compiz related. If we can find more specific which effect is related with this bug, maybe we can help finding what causes the problem. I suggest deselecting everything in the CompizConfig Settings Manager and then enabling them one by one until

[Bug 487096] Re: package linux-image-2.6.31-15-generic 2.6.31-15.50 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-11-23 Thread RodGer
Thanks for reporting the problem. Do you have grub 1 instead of grub 2 installed? I had the same error message after updating and restarting but I think that in my case there is not a real problem. While installing updates I had open the little terminal which shows the details of the installation

[Bug 439448] Re: notification area shows wrong icons. erratic behaviour

2009-11-21 Thread RodGer
The truth is that the problematic doubled icon varies. I think that since my last comment I've noticed the erratic behavior in every icon. -- notification area shows wrong icons. erratic behaviour https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439448 You received this bug notification because you are a member o

[Bug 484715] Re: [Ubuntu 9.10] reduce the backlight brightness when on battery power is not working

2009-11-19 Thread RodGer
ext73 can you please try to put on your panel the 'Power Manager Brightness Applet' and check if you can change the brightness using it? Thanks P.S.: I just saw a new notification in my notification area that seems to be relevant.Right clicking or just clicking does nothing.When I mouse over it

[Bug 484715] Re: [Ubuntu 9.10] reduce the backlight brightness when on battery power is not working

2009-11-19 Thread RodGer
I can confirm this. It seems like there is no access to the display brightness information due to a lack of suitable driver. I believe it is a hardware specific problem as there is no such problem on my girlfriend's laptop (as I can remember right now). On my laptop there is also an other instance

[Bug 444881] Re: [Karmic] Battery monitor applet doesn't show battery remaining time

2009-11-19 Thread RodGer
I have the same problem. I want to upload more information about my system since it seems (as said before) to be a hardware specific problem. What exactly will happen if I give 'apport-collect 444881' ? Will the apport program collect information for the certain package and my system and attach it

[Bug 484850] Re: gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-11-18 Thread RodGer
** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-utils Every time I use the dictionary applet and then close the little window containing the word definition, a frame shadow remains on the desktop. The shadow is only on the desktop and not on any window overlapping the certain area.

[Bug 484593] Re: [stellarium] All menus (location, date, help...) distorted.

2009-11-18 Thread RodGer
** Summary changed: - [ubuntu 9.10, stellarium] All menus (location, date, help...) distorted. + [stellarium] All menus (location, date, help...) distorted. -- [stellarium] All menus (location, date, help...) distorted. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484593 You received this bug notification be

[Bug 484868] Re: gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-11-18 Thread RodGer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 484850 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484850 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 484850 gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop. -- gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop. https

[Bug 484864] Re: gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-11-18 Thread RodGer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 484850 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484850 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 484850 gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop. -- gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop. https

[Bug 484868] Re: gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-11-18 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "gnome-dictionary-applet-bug.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35827275/gnome-dictionary-applet-bug.png ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35827278/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrari

[Bug 484868] [NEW] gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-11-18 Thread RodGer
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-utils Every time I use the dictionary applet and then close the little window containing the word definition, a frame shadow remains on the desktop. The shadow is only on the desktop and not on any window overlapping the certain area. For any needed

[Bug 484864] Re: gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-11-18 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "gnome-dictionary-applet-bug.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35827084/gnome-dictionary-applet-bug.png ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35827085/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrari

[Bug 484864] [NEW] gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-11-18 Thread RodGer
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-utils Every time I use the dictionary applet and then close the little window containing the word definition, a frame shadow remains on the desktop. The shadow is only on the desktop and not on any window overlapping the certain area. For any needed

[Bug 484850] [NEW] gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-11-18 Thread RodGer
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-utils Every time I use the dictionary applet and then close the little window containing the word definition, a frame shadow remains on the desktop. The shadow is only on the desktop and not on any window overlapping the certain area. For any needed

[Bug 484850] Re: gnome-dictionary-applet 2.28.1 window frame's shadow stays on desktop.

2009-11-18 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "gnome-dictionary-applet-bug.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35826556/gnome-dictionary-applet-bug.png ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35826557/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrari

[Bug 439448] Re: notification area shows wrong icons. erratic behaviour

2009-11-17 Thread RodGer
Just to check if it is an Nvidia driver problem as you said: my graphics card is an "Intel Corp. Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrat ed Graphics Controller". How can I check what driver I use? -- notification area shows wrong icons. erratic behaviour https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439448 You received t

[Bug 484593] Re: [ubuntu 9.10, stellarium] All menus (location, date, help...) distorted.

2009-11-17 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "Stellarium-bug.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35810685/Stellarium-bug.png ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35810686/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35810687/XsessionEr

[Bug 484593] [NEW] [ubuntu 9.10, stellarium] All menus (location, date, help...) distorted.

2009-11-17 Thread RodGer
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: stellarium Just check the screen shot. I can't use the program as I can't configure time, location etc because all the menus I could possibly open from stellarium's right panel, appear distorted. In case you need more information from me, just write a com

[Bug 484537] Re: Double sound icon and/or missing network manager icon and/or empty spot in the notification area.[Ubuntu 9.10]

2009-11-17 Thread RodGer
** Attachment added: "notification-area-bug.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35807252/notification-area-bug.png ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35807253/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "GConfNonDefault.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/3580

[Bug 484537] [NEW] Double sound icon and/or missing network manager icon and/or empty spot in the notification area.[Ubuntu 9.10]

2009-11-17 Thread RodGer
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel The bug I have is reported under bug report number 439448 here: 'https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome- panel/+bug/439448?comments=all' I didn't want to duplicate it but I wanted to give more info and I gave the command 'ubuntu-bug g

  1   2   >