Hi Wolfgang,
On Wednesday 08 July 2009 20:53:58 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > diff --git a/MAKEALL b/MAKEALL
> > index 41f1445..6c80694 100755
> > --- a/MAKEALL
> > +++ b/MAKEALL
> > @@ -524,6 +524,7 @@ LIST_ARM9=" \
> > scb9328 \
> > smdk2400
> -Original Message-
> From: Dieter Kiermaier [mailto:dk-arm-li...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 12:25 PM
> To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH2/2] Sheevaplug: Add Kirkwood
> gpio support to Sheevap
AT91sam9g45 series is an ARM 926ej-s SOC family clocked at 400/133MHz.
It embeds USB high speed host and device, LCD, DDR2 RAM, and a full set of
peripherals.
The first board that embeds at91sam9g45 chip is the AT91SAM9G45-EKES.
On the board you can find 2 USART, USB high speed,
a 480*272 LG lcd,
Hi Prafulla,
On Wednesday 08 July 2009 19:48:19 Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
> > MAINTAINERS |1 +
> > MAKEALL |1 +
> > Makefile |3 +
> > board/keymile/suen3/Makefile | 51 +
> > board/keymile/suen3/
Hi Stefan, hi Prafulla,
> Hi Prafulla,
>
> On Wednesday 08 July 2009 19:48:19 Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
> > > MAINTAINERS |1 +
> > > MAKEALL |1 +
> > > Makefile |3 +
> > > board/keymile/suen3/Makefile |
Hello Prafulla,
Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Heiko Schocher [mailto:h...@denx.de]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 12:05 PM
>> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
>> Cc: Wolfgang Denk; U-Boot user list; Prabhanjan Sarnaik;
>> Ashish Karkare
>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] bootcount
On Thursday 09 July 2009 09:21:33 Dieter Kiermaier wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 July 2009 19:48:19 Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
> > > > MAINTAINERS |1 +
> > > > MAKEALL |1 +
> > > > Makefile |3 +
> > > > board/keymil
Hello Prafulla,
> As stated in other email thread too.
> Now all dependencies for Sheevaplug board support are in accepted state
> except this patch http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055112.html
I know that but I cannot test it because I do not have the hardware,
so I depend on oth
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
2009/7/9 Wolfgang Denk :
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -680,6 +680,10 @@ Sergey Lapin
>>
>> afeb9260 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9260 SoC)
>>
>> +Po-Yu Chuang
>> +
>> + a320 FA526 (ARMv4/reuse arm920t source) faraday SoC
>
> Please keep lis
Dear Scott Wood,
In message <4a551d5a.5060...@freescale.com> you wrote:
>
> > But then applying this patch would break some boards that are working
> > now. Shirking off responsibility and have the board maintainers fix
> > it again is IMHO not the right thing to do.
>
> What would break? If t
Hello Stefan,
Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 July 2009 20:53:58 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> diff --git a/MAKEALL b/MAKEALL
>>> index 41f1445..6c80694 100755
>>> --- a/MAKEALL
>>> +++ b/MAKEALL
[...]
>>> +#define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS \
>>> + "load=tftp 40
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
In message <73173d32e9439e4abb5151606c3e19e202dd54d...@sc-vexch1.marvell.com>
you wrote:
>
> > No, he doesn't. He needs a register that is guaranteed to
> > keep it''s values across a processor reset.
>
> With Kirkwood, the only way to implement it is with flash assist
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
In message <73173d32e9439e4abb5151606c3e19e202dd54d...@sc-vexch1.marvell.com>
you wrote:
>
> > No chance? Is there really no register/mem array which keep
> > its value across a processor reset?
...
> Do you want only across reboots(i.e. resets)? How about re-power cycle
Hello
Magnus Lilja 08.07.09 17.42 Uhr >>>
> Hi
>
> You should define CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT since redboot has already
> setup the SDRAM. If you load U-boot to the address it's set up to
> execute from you should also define CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT.
> It's been a long while since I us
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
---
MAINTAINERS | 20
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 705bac5..0041112 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -583,6 +583,10 @@ Prakash Kumar
cerf250 xscal
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 16:59:46 Simon Kagstrom wrote:
> The VID header offset is sometimes needed to initialize the UBI
> partition. This patch adds it (optionally) to the command line
> for the ubi part command.
>
> (Lines have been properly wrapped since last version)
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Ka
The following changes since commit a350d0d37d7c113afbd9b0d2cf60ac542007f9e6:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ubi.git master
Simon Kagstrom (1):
Handle VID header offs
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Roese [mailto:s...@denx.de]
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 12:54 PM
> To: dk-arm-li...@gmx.de
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar; Ashish Karkare;
> Prabhanjan Sarnaik
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] arm/kirkwood: Add Keymile
> SUEN3
Dear Po-Yu Chuang,
In message you
wrote:
>
> >> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >> @@ -680,6 +680,10 @@ Sergey Lapin
> >>
> >> afeb9260ARM926EJS (AT91> SAM9260 SoC)
> >>
> >> +Po-Yu Chuang
> >> +
> >> + a320FA526 (ARM> v4/reuse arm920t source) faraday
In message <1247126279-2680-1-git-send-email...@denx.de> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 20
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Applied.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang De
ping?
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 05:30:04PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> From: Daniel Mack
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Daniel Mack
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] pxa: add clock for system bus 2 arbiter
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:30:04 +0200
> Message-Id: <1245771005-23299-1-git-send-email-dan...@caiaq
ping?
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 05:30:05PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> From: Daniel Mack
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Daniel Mack
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] pxa: fix CKEN_B register bits
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:30:05 +0200
> Message-Id: <1245771005-23299-2-git-send-email-dan...@caiaq.de>
> X-M
> -Original Message-
> From: Dieter Kiermaier [mailto:dk-arm-li...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 12:50 PM
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH2/2] Sheevaplug: Add Kirkwood
> gpio support to Sheevaplug
>
> Hi Prafulla,
>
> >
> > > -Original Message
Hi,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dieter Kiermaier [mailto:dk-arm-li...@gmx.de]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 12:50 PM
> > To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH2/2] Sheevaplug: Add Kirkwood
> > gpio support to Sheevaplug
> >
> > Hi Prafulla,
> >
> > >
> > > >
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:59:56 +0200
Stefan Roese wrote:
> The following changes since commit a350d0d37d7c113afbd9b0d2cf60ac542007f9e6:
> Wolfgang Denk (1):
> Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://www.denx.de/git/u
On Thursday 09 July 2009 10:16:11 Simon Kagstrom wrote:
> > The following changes since commit
> > a350d0d37d7c113afbd9b0d2cf60ac542007f9e6: Wolfgang Denk (1):
> > Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> > git://www.den
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 15:56:31 Simon Kagstrom wrote:
> Move __set/clear_bit from ubifs.h to bitops.h
>
> __set_bit and __clear_bit are defined in ubifs.h as well as in
> asm/include/bitops.h for some architectures. This patch moves
> the generic implementation to include/linux/bitops.h and uses
>
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:24:42 +0200
Stefan Roese wrote:
> > Thanks for applying this! However, I think the "[PATCH 8/8]: Command
> > improvements for ubifs" patch should also be uncontroversial:
>
> Yes. And I already acked it on the list. Please note that I'm "only" the co-
> custodian for the UB
On Thursday 09 July 2009 10:32:02 Simon Kagstrom wrote:
> > > To use ubifs on ARM, I also need the rest of the patch series
> > >
> > >http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055594.html
> > >
> > > but I haven't seen any comments on that so far.
> >
> > No comments doesn't have to be a
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 15:59:27 Simon Kagstrom wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Simon Kagstrom
Acked-by: Stefan Roese
Best regards,
Stefan
=
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Offi
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 15:58:51 Simon Kagstrom wrote:
> This patch adds unaligned.h for ARM (needed to build with LZO
> compression). The file is taken from the linux kernel, but includes
> u-boot headers instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Kagstrom
Acked-by: Stefan Roese
Best regards,
Stefan
=
Hi,
On Wednesday 08 July 2009 22:57, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Matthias Fuchs,
>
> In message <200907082251.27180.matthias.fu...@esd-electronics.com> you wrote:
> >
> > Do we have some old PPCBoot CVS accessible somewhere? I want to find out
> > what exactly is covers by the IBM license.
>
>
Hi Prafulla,
On Thursday 09 July 2009 09:15:29 Stefan Roese wrote:
> > > +++ b/board/keymile/suen3/sdramregs.txt
> >
> > Under which license?
>
> GPL of course. ;)
>
> And one question about this: Does "doimage" allow comments? And if yes,
> what's the comment control character? Is C-style support
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Kagstrom [mailto:simon.kagst...@netinsight.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 4:32 PM
> Cc: U-Boot ML; Prafulla Wadaskar
> Subject: [PATCH 1/4]: arm: Kirkwood: Set MAC address during
> registration for kirkwood egiga
>
> This patch sets the MAC ad
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:36:58 +0200
Stefan Roese wrote:
> Unfortunately we don't have many boards in mainline U-Boot yet that include
> UBI/UBIFS till now. So problems in this area might get unnoticed right now.
>
> Did you at least compile-test your patchset on some of the other
> architectures
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Roese [mailto:s...@denx.de]
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 2:19 PM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] arm/kirkwood: Add Keymile
> SUEN3 support
>
> Hi Prafulla,
On Thursday 09 July 2009 10:49:47 Simon Kagstrom wrote:
> > Did you at least compile-test your patchset on some of the other
> > architectures (PPC, MIPS...)?
>
> Well, the only other cross-compiler I had around is for powerpc. I
> built for the MPC8349ITX board, and that compiled just fine. But th
On Thursday 09 July 2009 10:44:13 Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> I just checked the nine years old initial version of 405gp_pci.c:
>
> http://ppcboot.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ppcboot/ppcboot/cpu/ppc4xx/405gp_
>pci.c?revision=1.1&view=markup
>
> I do not see that this file has anything in common with the
On Thursday 09 July 2009 11:00, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2009 10:44:13 Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > I just checked the nine years old initial version of 405gp_pci.c:
> >
> > http://ppcboot.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ppcboot/ppcboot/cpu/ppc4xx/405gp_
> >pci.c?revision=1.1&view=markup
>
Hello all,
I've added watchdog support based on U-Boot (git) for the m68k coldfire
mcf54455evb platform. I've fed the patch to the maintainer to help in
development.
However, I am unable to start my m68k w/MMU coldfire Linux kernel from
U-Boot if U-Boot is built with CONFIG_WATCHDOG regardless if
Hi Matthias
>>> Matthias Fuchs schrieb am 06.07.2009 um
11:23:
> Hi,
>
> I posted a similiar patch a long time ago:
>
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2007-July/022741.html
Missed that. Sorry.
> If we can use a powerful splashimage variable, I would vote for my
patch
> and check it on
On Thursday 09 July 2009 11:24:39 Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > Yes, those files don't have much in common any more. Only some comments
> > (which could be removed or rewritten) and and the sequence of some
> > register initialisation. But again, IANAL and I don't really know if we
> > can remove the I
following patch series makes a lot of updates for the
existing keymile boards kmeter1, kmsupx4, mgcoge and
mgsuvd. Also add nand support and an i2c deblock function
for the kmeter1 board.
The following changes since commit a350d0d37d7c113afbd9b0d2cf60ac542007f9e6:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merg
- CONFIG_SYS_MAX_I2C_BUS changed to 1
We use only one I2C hardwarecontroller on this boards, so
change the CONFIG_SYS_MAX_I2C_BUS to 1.
- common: dont print errormsg if second IVM Block lacks.
- 82xx, mgcoge: fix double mtdpart entry in environment
- 82xx, mgcoge: activate on second Flash the s
This patch adds the possibility to call a board specific
i2c bus reset routine for the fsl_i2c bus driver, and adds
this option for the keymile kmeter1 board.
The deblock sequence for this board is implemented and
tested in the following way:
CR = 0x20 (release SDA and SCL pin)
CR = 0xa0 (start r
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
---
board/keymile/kmeter1/Makefile |2 +-
board/keymile/kmeter1/nand.c | 153
include/configs/kmeter1.h |5 ++
3 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 board/keymile/kmeter1/nand.c
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message <200907091024.42759...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> Yes. And I already acked it on the list. Please note that I'm "only" the co-
> custodian for the UBI repository. We have no UBIFS custodian. So it needs to
> get into mainline via Wolfgang.
I see UBIFS and UBI as one to
Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Custodians,
>
> Do you have any problem with this asm-generic/errno.h patch?
>
> Patch is available in u-boot-microblaze.git asm-generic branch.
Looks good to me too.
Haavard
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http:/
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message <200907091151.51598...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> So it's even more important to know, if such files as this 4xx PCI code,
> which
> has nearly nothing in common with the original IBM code, can move to GPL. Not
> sure how to solve this issue though. Perhaps we should
Hi all,
I am using samsung 2416 and 2451 boards. in 2416 board in IROM mode If I do
watchdog reset (by using command RESET or directly writing in watchdog
registers)the board will reset and comes to boot prompt .but in my 2451
samsung board the if I do watchdog reset (by using command RESET or di
Hi all,
adding to my qustion , Iam using U-boot and 1.1.6 version for ARM9 board.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:36 PM, kishore choudhari wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using samsung 2416 and 2451 boards. in 2416 board in IROM mode If I
> do watchdog reset (by using command RESET or directly writing in wat
Hi Heiko,
On Thursday 09 July 2009 12:04:41 Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
> ---
> board/keymile/kmeter1/Makefile |2 +-
> board/keymile/kmeter1/nand.c
I suggest to move this NAND driver into the drivers/mtd/nand directory (e.g.
drivers/mtd/nand/kmeter1_nand.c). We t
On Thursday 09 July 2009 12:05:31 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Yes. And I already acked it on the list. Please note that I'm "only" the
> > co- custodian for the UBI repository. We have no UBIFS custodian. So it
> > needs to get into mainline via Wolfgang.
>
> I see UBIFS and UBI as one topic. Please r
On Thursday 09 July 2009 12:10:10 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > So it's even more important to know, if such files as this 4xx PCI code,
> > which has nearly nothing in common with the original IBM code, can move
> > to GPL. Not sure how to solve this issue though. Perhaps we should ask
> > somebody at
On Thursday 09 July 2009 11:45, Matthias Weisser wrote:
> Hi Matthias
>
> >>> Matthias Fuchs schrieb am 06.07.2009 um
> 11:23:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I posted a similiar patch a long time ago:
> >
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2007-July/022741.html
>
> Missed that. Sorry.
>
> > If we ca
This patch allows to override the libgcc Makefile inclusion from the toplevel
Makefile by the arch config.mk files. This is in preparation for the ARM
architecture to move away from including libgcc functions and only using
self-contained U-Boot functions as done in Linux.
Currently all the ARM bo
Hi Wolfgang,
Please pull my asm-generic branch. There is only one patch which
create asm-generic folder with errno.h.
I have got ack from ppc40x, blackfin, arm, coldfire and avr custodians.
Thanks,
Michal
The following changes since commit 59869ca72df8bc4e4ffa9dd17cb6673bbe010272:
Wolfgang D
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 16:01:02 Simon Kagstrom wrote:
> Check that an argument is passed to ubifsmount and that addresses and
> sizes are actually numbers for ubifsload. Also improve the instructions
> a bit.
Applied to u-boot-ubi. Thanks.
Simon, one request for your next patches. Please add a k
The following changes since commit a350d0d37d7c113afbd9b0d2cf60ac542007f9e6:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ubi.git master
Simon Kagstrom (2):
Handle VID header offs
Hi Jerry,
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Sascha,
>>
>> You seem to be the person acting as maintainer of u-boot-v2. Do you
>> have any input if u-boot-v2 would stay with GPLv2 or move to GPLv3?
>>
>> - k
>
> U-Boot v2 is the usage case I had in mind in my question:
>> Would U-Boot be willing to have
Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
>> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> Sascha,
>>>
>>> You seem to be the person acting as maintainer of u-boot-v2. Do you
>>> have any input if u-boot-v2 would stay with GPLv2 or move to GPLv3?
>>>
>>> - k
>> U-Boot v2 is the usage case I had in mind in my question:
>>> Wo
Hello Jean-Christophe,
2009/7/9 Daniel Mack :
> ping?
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 05:30:04PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> From: Daniel Mack
>> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Cc: Daniel Mack
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] pxa: add clock for system bus 2 arbiter
>> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:30:04 +0200
>> M
Ira W. Snyder wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 05:59:33PM -0500, Peter Tyser wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 15:31 -0700, Ira W. Snyder wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:28:39PM -0500, Peter Tyser wrote:
These changes bring the 83xx SDRAM ECC initialization in line
with the 85xx/86xx
On 13:00 Thu 09 Jul , Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> Please pull my asm-generic branch. There is only one patch which
> create asm-generic folder with errno.h.
> I have got ack from ppc40x, blackfin, arm, coldfire and avr custodians.
please add this info in the commit
Best Regards,
J.
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 13:00 Thu 09 Jul , Michal Simek wrote:
>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>
>> Please pull my asm-generic branch. There is only one patch which
>> create asm-generic folder with errno.h.
>> I have got ack from ppc40x, blackfin, arm, coldfire and avr custodians.
> pl
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message <200907091215.59930...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> > BTW - what's the situation with the corresponding Linux headers?
>
> The Linux code is completely different here. I based my 4xx code in my first
> U-Boot port on the IBM PIBS code and not Linux.
Then maybe we can im
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Jean-Christophe
PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 00:29 Wed 08 Jul , Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
>> This patch series clean up and update pin mux for pandora.
>> The update is needed for rev3 or later boards to work properly,
>> but older boards still work after this.
>>
On Thursday 09 July 2009 14:20:40 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > > BTW - what's the situation with the corresponding Linux headers?
> >
> > The Linux code is completely different here. I based my 4xx code in my
> > first U-Boot port on the IBM PIBS code and not Linux.
>
> Then maybe we can import the rel
Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2009 00:18:54 Jerry Van Baren wrote:
>> Regardless of the in/out debate, we should print a warning if %ll is
>> used but not supported. I would suggest simply printing the "%lld" (or
>> whatever the format is) and pop two longs from the varargs. That woul
Liu Dave-R63238 wrote:
>> According to Ira, the DMA method was faster than the cpu method:
>> "It makes the DMA initialization normal speed again. The DMA
>> in the for loop takes the longest (as expected).
>>
>> So yes, strangely it (enabling the icache) makes a HUGE
>> difference. The total tim
On Thursday 09 July 2009 14:24:49 Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> > All this would increase the code size for those boards not supporting the
> > 64bit printf format. Not sure by how much, but I suggest to just fix the
> > problem by supporting this format correctly instead of adding new code to
> > print
Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Liu Dave-R63238 wrote:
>>> According to Ira, the DMA method was faster than the cpu method:
>>> "It makes the DMA initialization normal speed again. The DMA
>>> in the for loop takes the longest (as expected).
>>>
>>> So yes, strangely it (enabling the icache) makes a HUGE
Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2009 14:24:49 Jerry Van Baren wrote:
>>> All this would increase the code size for those boards not supporting the
>>> 64bit printf format. Not sure by how much, but I suggest to just fix the
>>> problem by supporting this format correctly instead of adding
> -Original Message-
> From: l.ping...@gmail.com [mailto:l.ping...@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Remy Bohmer
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 1:00 PM
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar; Michael Trimarchi
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Ronen Shitrit;
> Ashish Karkare
> Subject: Re: [PA
This patch adds support splash image positioning by adding an
additional variable "splashpos" to the environment. Please see
README for details.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Weisser
---
README | 19 +++
common/lcd.c| 39
Hi,
>> At least there is 1 significant difference between your patch
>> and the patch of Michael
>>
>> Your patch contains this:
>>
>> - typeReq = req->request << 8 | req->requesttype;
>> + typeReq = req->request | req->requesttype <
Hello Stefan,
Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2009 12:04:41 Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
>> ---
>> board/keymile/kmeter1/Makefile |2 +-
>> board/keymile/kmeter1/nand.c
>
> I suggest to move this NAND driver into the drivers/mtd/nand directory (e.g.
> dr
On Thursday 09 July 2009 16:59:02 Heiko Schocher wrote:
> >> board/keymile/kmeter1/Makefile |2 +-
> >> board/keymile/kmeter1/nand.c
> >
> > I suggest to move this NAND driver into the drivers/mtd/nand directory
> > (e.g. drivers/mtd/nand/kmeter1_nand.c). We try to collect all drivers
> > here
This cleans up U-Boot's toplevel directory a bit and makes the
architecture 'config.mk' file naming and location similar to board and
cpu 'config.mk' files
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser
---
config.mk|2 +-
arm_config.mk => lib_arm/config.mk
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser
---
README |2 +-
board/actux1/u-boot.lds|2 +-
board/actux2/u-boot.lds|2 +-
board/actux3/u-boot.lds|2 +-
board/freescale/mx31ads/u-boot.lds |2 +-
board/trab/Makefile|
This series moves api_examples to api/examples and moves all
lib* directories into a common lib/ directory. It also
moves the _config.mk files into their corresponding
lib directory.
Seeing 12 lib_ directories and 12 _config.mk
files in U-Boot's top level always annoyed me, and I
finally had some
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser
---
Makefile |4
README|4 ++--
api_examples/Makefile |4 ++--
board/LEOX/elpt860/u-boot.lds | 10 +-
board/RPXClassic/u-boot.
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser
---
README |2 +-
board/cobra5272/u-boot.lds |2 +-
board/esd/tasreg/u-boot.lds |2 +-
board/freescale/m52277evb/u-boot.spa |2 +-
board/freescale/m5235evb/u-boot.16 |4 ++--
board/freescale/m5235evb
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser
---
Makefile |8 ++--
README | 12 ++--
config.mk|1 -
doc/README.nios |2 +-
include/common.h
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser
---
README |2 +-
doc/TODO-i386|2 +-
include/asm-i386/interrupt.h |2 +-
include/asm-i386/u-boot-i386.h |4 ++--
{lib_i386 => lib/i386}/Makefile |0
{lib_i3
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser
---
Makefile |2 +-
{libfdt => lib/libfdt}/Makefile |0
{libfdt => lib/libfdt}/README|0
{libfdt => lib/libfdt}/fdt.c |0
{libfdt => lib/libfdt}/fdt_ro.c |0
{libfdt => lib/lib
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser
---
Makefile|4 ++--
{api_examples => api/examples}/.gitignore |0
{api_examples => api/examples}/Makefile |8
{api_examples => api/examples}/crt0.S |0
{api_examples => api/examples}/demo.c
On Wed 8 Jul 2009 14:50, Robin Getz pondered:
> Linux's netconsole works much better when you can pass it the MAC
> address of the server. (otherwise it just uses broadcast, which
> everyone else on my network complains about :)
>
> This sets the evn var "serveraddr" (to match ethaddr), so that yo
Dear all,
if I enable the flag CFG_FLASH_USE_BUFFER_WRITE in the u-boot
configuration (u-boot 1.2.0 I get a timeout when trying to write the flash
Numonyx Axcell M29EW.
Have you any idea about this problem?
Bye,
Antonio.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot
On Thursday 09 July 2009 07:21:16 Detlev Zundel wrote:
> > Wolfgang's last word was pretty adamant about taking U-Boot to GPLv3. I
> > see the U-Boot v2 GPLv3/GPLv2-plugin technique as a way to take the core
> > to GPLv3 without "needlessly" re-writing the parts we've borrowed from
> > linux (in f
On Thursday 09 July 2009 11:12:47 Robin Getz wrote:
> On Wed 8 Jul 2009 14:50, Robin Getz pondered:
> > Linux's netconsole works much better when you can pass it the MAC
> > address of the server. (otherwise it just uses broadcast, which
> > everyone else on my network complains about :)
> >
> > Th
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 05:58:50PM -0700, Ira W. Snyder wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 07:32:26PM -0500, Peter Tyser wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 08:24 +0800, Liu Dave-R63238 wrote:
> > > > When SDRAM ECC is enabled and CONFIG_ECC_INIT_VIA_DDRCONTROLLER is not
> > > > defined use DMA to set S
On Jul 6, 2009, at 5:55 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Medium term goal:
>
>Analyze which parts of U-Boot are implemented by GPLv2-only
>code, and evaluate options to convert these into GPLv2+later.
>
> Long term goal:
>
> Move U-Boot to GPLv3.
Its not clear if you've decided
On 2009-07-09, at 17:08, Peter Tyser wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser
> ---
> Makefile|4 ++--
> {api_examples => api/examples}/.gitignore |0
> {api_examples => api/examples}/Makefile |8
> {api_examples => api/examples}/crt0.S
Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: l.ping...@gmail.com [mailto:l.ping...@gmail.com] On
>> Behalf Of Remy Bohmer
>> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 1:00 PM
>> To: Prafulla Wadaskar; Michael Trimarchi
>> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Ronen Shitri
Hi Rafal,
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 18:22 +0200, Rafal Jaworowski wrote:
> On 2009-07-09, at 17:08, Peter Tyser wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser
> > ---
> > Makefile|4 ++--
> > {api_examples => api/examples}/.gitignore |0
> > {api_examples => api/
Ira W. Snyder wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 05:58:50PM -0700, Ira W. Snyder wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 07:32:26PM -0500, Peter Tyser wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 08:24 +0800, Liu Dave-R63238 wrote:
[snip]
>> Both the DMA and CPU methods are definitely on the same order of
>> magnitu
Hi
Could you please do reply-all and keep all addresses when replying to
a mail? I don't read all mail from the list so it's easy to miss a
followup.
2009/7/9 Ulrich Gerster :
> Hello
>
> Magnus Lilja 08.07.09 17.42 Uhr >>>
>> Hi
>>
>> You should define CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT since redboo
On Thursday 09 July 2009 12:10:48 Kumar Gala wrote:
> I ask because its my understanding from internal Freescale discussions
> (from the PPC group) that its Freescale's preference to stick with
> GPLv2. What Freescale will decide to do if the decision is to move to
> GPLv3 is not clear at this poi
On Thursday 09 July 2009 11:08:17 Peter Tyser wrote:
> Peter Tyser (9):
> Move architecture specific config.mk files into subdirs
if nothing else changes, this should go in. acked-by-me for this.
> Move lib_ppc to lib/ppc
> Move lib_arm to lib/arm
> Move lib_i386 to lib/i386
> Move lib
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
